Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Wheat variety, irrigation and herbicide had no significant effect on grain and straw NPK content.

A claim from Response of wheat varieties to different irrigation scheduling and herbicides application on NPK content and uptake in grain and straw under zero tillage practice · 2025

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat variety, irrigation and herbicide had no significant effect on grain and straw NPK content.

Treatment
different wheat varieties, irrigation levels and herbicides applicatione0
Outcome
NPK content in grain and strawe0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingDirectionValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The effect of different wheat varieties, irrigation levels and herbicides application on NPK content in grain and straw was found non-significant under zero tillage practice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 224–397
t0

“Response of wheat varieties to different irrigation scheduling”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–62

Title

Response of wheat varieties to different irrigation scheduling and herbicides application on NPK content and uptake in grain and straw under zero tillage practice

Pradeep Kumar; Sushil Kumar Singh; Muli Devi Parihar; et al. International Journal of Research in Agronomy 2025. doi:10.33545/2618060x.2025.v8.i6g.3078

Other claims from this paper (11)

Record rev-2582cddf3bbcea2d21fb8f51dd1f5627fa5c40daf09ae8013debed8df5855f54 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

herbicide · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

33 papers: 28 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this claim · 28 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

24 papers more in this group

See all 33 papers →

irrigation · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

103 papers: 74 positive, 29 negative or no effect

29 papers in the same direction as this claim · 73 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

94 papers more in this group

See all 103 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.