Paper · 2023 · Small

Role of Soil and Foliar‐Applied Carbon Dots in Plant Iron Biofortification and Cadmium Mitigation by Triggering Opposite Iron Signaling in Roots

Yixia Zhu; Qian Zhang; Yanjuan Li; et al.

9
claims
9
verbatim quotes
35
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract In China, iron (Fe) availability is low in most soils but cadmium (Cd) generally exceeds regulatory soil pollution limits. Thus, biofortification of Fe along with mitigation of Cd in edible plant parts is important for human nutrition and health. Carbon dots (CDs) are considered as potential nanomaterials for agricultural applications. Here, Salvia miltiorrhiza ‐derived CDs are an efficient modulator of Fe, manganese (Mn), zinc (Zn), and Cd accumulation in plants. CDs irrigation (1 mg mL −1 , performed every week starting at the jointing stage for 12 weeks) increased Fe content by 18% but mitigated Cd accumulation by 20% in wheat grains. This finding was associated with the Fe 3+ ‐mobilizing properties of CDs from the soil and root cell wall, as well as endocytosis‐dependent internalization in roots. The resulting excess Fe signaling mitigated Cd uptake via inhibiting TaNRAMP5 expression. Foliar spraying of CDs enhanced Fe (44%), Mn (30%), and Zn (19%) content with an unchanged Cd accumulation in wheat grains. This result is attributed to CDs‐enhanced light signaling, which triggered shoot‐to‐root Fe deficiency response. This study not only reveals the molecular mechanism underlying CDs modulation of Fe signaling in plants but also provides useful strategies for concurrent Fe biofortification and Cd mitigation in plant‐based foods.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Carbon dot irrigation increased wheat grain iron content by 18%.

Organ / stage
grainse0
Treatment
CDs irrigation (1 mg mL −1 , performed every week starting at the jointing stage for 12 weeks)e0
Outcome
Fe contente0
Direction
increasede0
Value
18%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“CDs irrigation (1 mg mL −1 , performed every week starting at the jointing stage for 12 weeks) increased Fe content by 18% but mitigated Cd accumulation by 20% in wheat grains.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 478–654 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Carbon dot irrigation reduced wheat grain cadmium accumulation by 20%.

Organ / stage
grainse0
Treatment
CDs irrigation (1 mg mL −1 , performed every week starting at the jointing stage for 12 weeks)e0
Outcome
Cd accumulatione0
Direction
mitigatede0
Value
20%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“CDs irrigation (1 mg mL −1 , performed every week starting at the jointing stage for 12 weeks) increased Fe content by 18% but mitigated Cd accumulation by 20% in wheat grains.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 478–654 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors associate irrigation effects with carbon dot iron mobilization and root internalization.

Organ / stage
rootse0
Treatment
CDse0
Outcome
Fe 3+ ‐mobilizing propertiese0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“This finding was associated with the Fe 3+ ‐mobilizing properties of CDs from the soil and root cell wall, as well as endocytosis‐dependent internalization in roots.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 655–820 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Excess iron signaling mitigated cadmium uptake by inhibiting TaNRAMP5 expression.

Gene
TaNRAMP5e0
Compound
Fee0
Outcome
Cd uptakee0
Direction
mitigatede0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“The resulting excess Fe signaling mitigated Cd uptake via inhibiting TaNRAMP5 expression.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 821–910 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar carbon dot spraying enhanced wheat grain iron content by 44%.

Organ / stage
grainse0
Treatment
Foliar spraying of CDse0
Outcome
Fee0
Direction
enhancede0
Value
44%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Foliar spraying of CDs enhanced Fe (44%), Mn (30%), and Zn (19%) content with an unchanged Cd accumulation in wheat grains.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 911–1034 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar carbon dot spraying enhanced wheat grain manganese content by 30%.

Organ / stage
grainse0
Treatment
Foliar spraying of CDse0
Outcome
Mne0
Direction
enhancede0
Value
30%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Foliar spraying of CDs enhanced Fe (44%), Mn (30%), and Zn (19%) content with an unchanged Cd accumulation in wheat grains.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 911–1034 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar carbon dot spraying enhanced wheat grain zinc content by 19%.

Organ / stage
grainse0
Treatment
Foliar spraying of CDse0
Outcome
Zne0
Direction
enhancede0
Value
19%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Foliar spraying of CDs enhanced Fe (44%), Mn (30%), and Zn (19%) content with an unchanged Cd accumulation in wheat grains.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 911–1034 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar carbon dot spraying left wheat grain cadmium accumulation unchanged.

Organ / stage
grainse0
Treatment
Foliar spraying of CDse0
Outcome
Cd accumulatione0
Direction
unchangede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Foliar spraying of CDs enhanced Fe (44%), Mn (30%), and Zn (19%) content with an unchanged Cd accumulation in wheat grains.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 911–1034 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors attribute foliar effects to enhanced light signaling and a shoot-to-root iron deficiency response.

Treatment
CDse0
Outcome
shoot‐to‐root Fe deficiency responsee0
Qualifier
light signalinge0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“This result is attributed to CDs‐enhanced light signaling, which triggered shoot‐to‐root Fe deficiency response.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1035–1147 · show in text ↑

irrigation · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

103 papers: 74 positive, 29 negative or no effect

73 papers in the same direction as this paper · 29 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

99 papers more in this group

See all 103 papers →

application · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

275 papers: 257 positive, 18 negative or no effect

256 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

271 papers more in this group

See all 275 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.