Paper · 2021 · Journal of Integrative Agriculture

Improving winter wheat grain yield and water-/nitrogen-use efficiency by optimizing the micro-sprinkling irrigation amount and nitrogen application rate

Jin-peng LI; Zhen ZHANG; Chun-sheng YAO; et al.

20
claims
40
verbatim quotes
55
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Available irrigation resources are becoming increasingly scarce in the North China Plain (NCP), and nitrogen-use efficiency of crop production is also relatively low. Thus, it is imperative to improve the water-use efficiency (WUE) and nitrogen fertilizer productivity on the NCP. Here, we conducted a two-year field experiment to explore the effects of different irrigation amounts (S60, 60 mm; S90, 90 mm; S120, 120 mm; S150, 150 mm) and nitrogen application rates (150, 195 and 240 kg ha–1; denoted as N1, N2 and N3, respectively) under micro-sprinkling with water and nitrogen combined on the grain yield (GY), yield components, leaf area index (LAI), flag leaf chlorophyll content, dry matter accumulation (DM), WUE, and nitrogen partial factor productivity (NPFP). The results indicated that the GY and NPFP increased significantly with increasing irrigation amount, but there was no significant difference between S120 and S150; WUE significantly increased first but then decreased with increasing irrigation and S120 achieved the highest WUE. The increase in nitrogen was beneficial to improving the GY and WUE in S60 and S90, while the excessive nitrogen application (N3) significantly reduced the GY and WUE in S120 and S150 compared with those in the N2 treatment. The NPFP significantly decreased with increasing nitrogen rate under the same irrigation treatments. The synchronous increase in spike number (SN) and 1 000-grain weight (TWG) was the main reason for the large increase in GY by micro-sprinkling with increasing irrigation, and the differences in SN and TGW between S120 and S150 were small. Under S60 and S90, the TGW increased with increasing nitrogen application, which enhanced the GY, while N2 achieved the highest TWG in S120 and S150. At the filling stage, the LAI increased with increasing irrigation, and greater amounts of irrigation significantly increased the chlorophyll content in the flag leaf, which was instrumental in increasing DM after anthesis and increasing the TGW. Micro-sprinkling with increased amounts of irrigation or excessive nitrogen application decreased the WUE mainly due to the increase in total water consumption (ET) and the small increase or decrease in GY. Moreover, the increase in irrigation increased the total nitrogen accumulation or contents (TNC) of plants at maturity and reduced the residual nitrate-nitrogen in the soil (SNC), which was conducive to the increase in NPFP, but there was no significant difference in TNC between S120 and S150. Under the same irrigation treatments, an increase in nitrogen application significantly increased the residual SNC and decreased the NPFP. Overall, micro-sprinkling with 120 mm of irrigation and a total nitrogen application of 195 kg ha–1 can lead to increases in GY, WUE and NPFP on the NCP.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 20

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain yield rose significantly with increasing irrigation amount.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
increasing irrigation amounte0
Outcome
GYe0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–22 · show in text ↑
e0

“the GY and NPFP increased significantly with increasing irrigation amount”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 798–871 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen partial factor productivity rose significantly with increasing irrigation amount.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
increasing irrigation amounte0
Outcome
NPFPe0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–22 · show in text ↑
e0

“the GY and NPFP increased significantly with increasing irrigation amount”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 798–871 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain yield and nitrogen productivity did not differ significantly between S120 and S150.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
S120e0
Outcome
no significant differencee0
Direction
no significant differencee0
Comparator
S150e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–22 · show in text ↑
e0

“there was no significant difference between S120 and S150”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 877–934 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Water-use efficiency first rose then fell with increasing irrigation and peaked at S120.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
increasing irrigatione0
Outcome
WUEe0
Direction
increased first but then decreasede0
Qualifier
S120 achieved the highest WUEe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–22 · show in text ↑
e0

“WUE significantly increased first but then decreased with increasing irrigation and S120 achieved the highest WUE.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 936–1050 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing nitrogen improved grain yield under S60 and S90.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
increase in nitrogene0
Outcome
GYe0
Direction
improvinge0
Qualifier
S60 and S90e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–22 · show in text ↑
e0

“The increase in nitrogen was beneficial to improving the GY and WUE in S60 and S90”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1051–1133 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing nitrogen improved WUE under S60 and S90.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
increase in nitrogene0
Outcome
WUEe0
Direction
improvinge0
Qualifier
S60 and S90e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–22 · show in text ↑
e0

“The increase in nitrogen was beneficial to improving the GY and WUE in S60 and S90”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1051–1133 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

N3 reduced grain yield significantly versus N2 under S120 and S150.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
N3e0
Outcome
GYe0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
S120 and S150e0
Comparator
N2 treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–22 · show in text ↑
e0

“excessive nitrogen application (N3) significantly reduced the GY and WUE in S120 and S150 compared with those in the N2 treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1145–1275 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

N3 reduced WUE significantly versus N2 under S120 and S150.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
N3e0
Outcome
WUEe0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
S120 and S150e0
Comparator
N2 treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–22 · show in text ↑
e0

“excessive nitrogen application (N3) significantly reduced the GY and WUE in S120 and S150 compared with those in the N2 treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1145–1275 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen partial factor productivity fell significantly as nitrogen rate increased.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
increasing nitrogen ratee0
Outcome
NPFPe0
Direction
decreasede0
Qualifier
under the same irrigation treatmentse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–22 · show in text ↑
e0

“The NPFP significantly decreased with increasing nitrogen rate under the same irrigation treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1276–1376 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spike number and 1,000-grain weight increased together with irrigation, explaining increased yield.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
increasing irrigatione0
Outcome
large increase in GYe0
Qualifier
synchronous increase in spike number (SN) and 1 000-grain weight (TWG)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–22 · show in text ↑
e0

“The synchronous increase in spike number (SN) and 1 000-grain weight (TWG) was the main reason for the large increase in GY by micro-sprinkling with increasing irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1377–1547 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spike number and grain weight differed little between S120 and S150.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
differences in SN and TGWe0
Direction
smalle0
Comparator
S120 and S150e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–22 · show in text ↑
e0

“the differences in SN and TGW between S120 and S150 were small.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1553–1616 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Thousand-grain weight increased with nitrogen rate under S60 and S90, enhancing yield.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
increasing nitrogen applicatione0
Outcome
TGWe0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
Under S60 and S90e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–22 · show in text ↑
e0

“Under S60 and S90, the TGW increased with increasing nitrogen application, which enhanced the GY”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1617–1713 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N2 gave the highest grain weight under S120 and S150.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
N2e0
Outcome
TWGe0
Direction
higheste0
Qualifier
S120 and S150e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–22 · show in text ↑
e0

“N2 achieved the highest TWG in S120 and S150.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1721–1766 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At filling, leaf area index increased with irrigation.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Organ / stage
filling stagee0
Treatment
increasing irrigatione0
Outcome
LAIe0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–22 · show in text ↑
e0

“At the filling stage, the LAI increased with increasing irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1767–1833 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Greater irrigation significantly increased flag leaf chlorophyll content.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Organ / stage
flag leafe0
Treatment
greater amounts of irrigatione0
Outcome
chlorophyll contente0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–22 · show in text ↑
e0

“greater amounts of irrigation significantly increased the chlorophyll content in the flag leaf”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1839–1933 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increased chlorophyll helped raise dry matter after anthesis and thousand-grain weight.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
increasing DM after anthesis and increasing the TGWe0
Qualifier
after anthesise0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–22 · show in text ↑
e0

“increasing DM after anthesis and increasing the TGW”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1961–2012 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High irrigation or excess nitrogen decreased WUE through greater total water consumption and small or negative yield change.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
increased amounts of irrigation or excessive nitrogen applicatione0
Outcome
WUEe0
Qualifier
increase in total water consumption (ET) and the small increase or decrease in GYe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–22 · show in text ↑
e0

“Micro-sprinkling with increased amounts of irrigation or excessive nitrogen application decreased the WUE mainly due to the increase in total water consumption (ET) and the small increase or decrease in GY.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2014–2220 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing irrigation raised plant total nitrogen at maturity and reduced residual soil nitrate, supporting nitrogen productivity.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
increase in irrigatione0
Outcome
total nitrogen accumulation or contents (TNC) of plants at maturity and reduced the residual nitrate-nitrogen in the soil (SNC)e0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–22 · show in text ↑
e0

“the increase in irrigation increased the total nitrogen accumulation or contents (TNC) of plants at maturity and reduced the residual nitrate-nitrogen in the soil (SNC), which was conducive to the increase in NPFP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2231–2444 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant nitrogen accumulation did not significantly differ between S120 and S150.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
TNCe0
Direction
no significant differencee0
Comparator
S120 and S150e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–22 · show in text ↑
e0

“there was no significant difference in TNC between S120 and S150.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2450–2515 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors concluded that 120 mm irrigation plus 195 kg ha–1 nitrogen can improve yield and use efficiencies.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
120 mm of irrigation and a total nitrogen application of 195 kg ha–1e0
Outcome
increases in GY, WUE and NPFPe0
Setting
NCPe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–22 · show in text ↑
e0

“micro-sprinkling with 120 mm of irrigation and a total nitrogen application of 195 kg ha–1 can lead to increases in GY, WUE and NPFP on the NCP.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2664–2808 · show in text ↑

irrigation · physiology: pigments · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

34 papers: 25 positive, 9 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

30 papers more in this group

See all 34 papers →

nitrogen · physiology: water · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

101 papers: 88 positive, 13 negative or no effect

87 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

97 papers more in this group

See all 101 papers →

irrigation · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

103 papers: 74 positive, 29 negative or no effect

73 papers in the same direction as this paper · 29 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

99 papers more in this group

See all 103 papers →

irrigation · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

242 papers: 177 positive, 65 negative or no effect

176 papers in the same direction as this paper · 61 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

238 papers more in this group

See all 242 papers →

irrigation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

989 papers: 798 positive, 191 negative or no effect

797 papers in the same direction as this paper · 184 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

985 papers more in this group

See all 989 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

2,061 papers: 1,737 positive, 324 negative or no effect

1,736 papers in the same direction as this paper · 285 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

2,057 papers more in this group

See all 2,061 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.