Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Soil water level had no effect on main stem development rate.

A claim from Estimation of Spring Wheat Leaf Growth Rates and Anthesis from Air Temperature1 · 1984

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil water level had no effect on main stem development rate.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
Soil water levele0
Outcome
main stem development ratee0
Direction
no effecte0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Soil water level and fertilizer N rate had no effect on main stem development rate, but did affect the maximum number of tillers produced per plant.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1592–1740
t0

“Spring Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–26

Title

Estimation of Spring Wheat Leaf Growth Rates and Anthesis from Air Temperature1

Armand Bauer; A. B. Frank; A. L. Black Agronomy Journal 1984. doi:10.2134/agronj1984.00021962007600050027x

Other claims from this paper (16)

Record rev-0adddfaf502fb5b8fb15f93323a882288e335d3875a82539d3d12b9b28080eee · schema claims-v0.9 · position 11 in the model’s answer

irrigation · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

242 papers: 177 positive, 65 negative or no effect

64 papers in the same direction as this claim · 177 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

233 papers more in this group

See all 242 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.