Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Irrigation increased IPAR and RUE.

A claim from Irrigation strategy, nitrogen application and fungicide control in winter wheat on a sandy soil. II. Radiation interception and conversion · 2000

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation increased IPAR and RUE.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
Irrigatione0
Outcome
IPAR and RUEe0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Irrigation increased both IPAR and RUE.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 944–983
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–79

Title

Irrigation strategy, nitrogen application and fungicide control in winter wheat on a sandy soil. II. Radiation interception and conversion

J. E. OLESEN; L. N. JØRGENSEN; J. V. MORTENSEN The Journal of Agricultural Science 2000. doi:10.1017/s0021859699007285

Other claims from this paper (11)

Record rev-abf0e3f934aacd34588fab013bbf32fc67c9c119371bb1465bd2d3be8bd1c0f5 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

irrigation · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

242 papers: 177 positive, 65 negative or no effect

176 papers in the same direction as this claim · 61 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. no effect
  7. negative
  8. no effect

233 papers more in this group

See all 242 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.