Paper · 2022 · Plants

Collaborative Impact of Compost and Beneficial Rhizobacteria on Soil Properties, Physiological Attributes, and Productivity of Wheat Subjected to Deficit Irrigation in Salt Affected Soil

Alaa El-Dein Omara; Emad M. Hafez; Hany S. Osman; et al.

13
claims
19
verbatim quotes
90
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Plant growth and crop productivity under unfavorable environmental challenges require a unique strategy to scavenge the severely negative impacts of these challenges such as soil salinity and water stress. Compost and plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) have many beneficial impacts, particularly in plants exposed to different types of stress. Therefore, a field experiment during two successive seasons was conducted to investigate the impact of compost and PGPR either separately or in a combination on exchangeable sodium percentage (ESP), soil enzymes (urease and dehydrogenase), wheat physiology, antioxidant defense system, growth, and productivity under deficient irrigation and soil salinity conditions. Our findings showed that exposure of wheat plants to deficit irrigation in salt-affected soil inhibited wheat growth and development, and eventually reduced crop productivity. However, these injurious impacts were diminished after soil amendment using the combined application of compost and PGPR. This combined application enhanced soil urease and dehydrogenase, ion selectivity, chlorophylls, carotenoids, stomatal conductance, and the relative water content (RWC) whilst reducing ESP, proline content, which eventually increased the yield-related traits of wheat plants under deficient irrigation conditions. Moreover, the coupled application of compost and PGPR reduced the uptake of Na and resulted in an increment in superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT), and peroxidase (POX) activities that lessened oxidative damage and improved the nutrient uptake (N, P, and K) of deficiently irrigated wheat plants under soil salinity. It was concluded that to protect wheat plants from environmental stressors, such as water stress and soil salinity, co-application of compost with PGPR was found to be effective.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Deficit irrigation in salt-affected soil inhibited wheat growth and development.

Treatment
deficit irrigation in salt-affected soile0
Outcome
wheat growth and developmente0
Direction
inhibitede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“exposure of wheat plants to deficit irrigation in salt-affected soil inhibited wheat growth and development, and eventually reduced crop productivity.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 746–896 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Deficit irrigation in salt-affected soil reduced wheat productivity.

Treatment
deficit irrigation in salt-affected soile0
Outcome
crop productivitye0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“exposure of wheat plants to deficit irrigation in salt-affected soil inhibited wheat growth and development, and eventually reduced crop productivity.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 746–896 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined compost and PGPR enhanced soil urease and dehydrogenase.

Treatment
combined application of compost and PGPRe0
Outcome
soil urease and dehydrogenasee0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“soil amendment using the combined application of compost and PGPR. This combined application enhanced soil urease and dehydrogenase”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 952–1083 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined compost and PGPR enhanced wheat ion selectivity, chlorophylls and carotenoids under deficient irrigation.

Treatment
combined application of compost and PGPRe0
Interactor
PGPRe0symbiont
Outcome
ion selectivity, chlorophylls, carotenoidse0
Direction
enhancede0
Qualifier
under deficient irrigation conditionse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“combined application of compost and PGPR. This combined application enhanced soil urease and dehydrogenase, ion selectivity, chlorophylls, carotenoids, stomatal conductance, and the relative water content (RWC) whilst reducing ESP, proline content, which eventually increased the yield-related traits of wheat plants under deficient irrigation conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 977–1332 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined compost and PGPR enhanced wheat stomatal conductance and relative water content.

Treatment
combined application of compost and PGPRe0
Interactor
PGPRe0symbiont
Outcome
stomatal conductance, and the relative water contente0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“combined application of compost and PGPR. This combined application enhanced soil urease and dehydrogenase, ion selectivity, chlorophylls, carotenoids, stomatal conductance, and the relative water content (RWC) whilst reducing ESP, proline content, which eventually increased the yield-related traits of wheat plants under deficient irrigation conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 977–1332 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined compost and PGPR reduced soil ESP.

Treatment
combined application of compost and PGPRe0
Outcome
ESPe1
Direction
reducinge1

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“combined application of compost and PGPR”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 977–1017 · show in text ↑
e1

“whilst reducing ESP, proline content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1188–1224 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined compost and PGPR reduced wheat proline content.

Treatment
combined application of compost and PGPRe0
Interactor
PGPRe0symbiont
Outcome
proline contente1
Direction
reducinge1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“combined application of compost and PGPR”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 977–1017 · show in text ↑
e1

“whilst reducing ESP, proline content, which eventually increased the yield-related traits of wheat plants under deficient irrigation conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1188–1332 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined compost and PGPR increased wheat yield-related traits under deficient irrigation.

Treatment
combined application of compost and PGPRe0
Interactor
PGPRe0symbiont
Outcome
yield-related traitse1
Direction
increasede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“combined application of compost and PGPR”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 977–1017 · show in text ↑
e1

“increased the yield-related traits of wheat plants under deficient irrigation conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1243–1332 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Coupled compost and PGPR reduced wheat Na uptake under salinity and deficient irrigation.

Treatment
coupled application of compost and PGPRe0
Interactor
PGPRe0symbiont
Outcome
uptake of Nae0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
deficiently irrigated wheat plants under soil salinitye1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the coupled application of compost and PGPR reduced the uptake of Na”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1343–1411 · show in text ↑
e1

“deficiently irrigated wheat plants under soil salinity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1601–1655 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Coupled compost and PGPR increased wheat SOD, CAT and POX activities.

Treatment
coupled application of compost and PGPRe0
Interactor
PGPRe0symbiont
Outcome
superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT), and peroxidase (POX) activitiese0
Direction
incremente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the coupled application of compost and PGPR reduced the uptake of Na and resulted in an increment in superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT), and peroxidase (POX) activities that lessened oxidative damage and improved the nutrient uptake (N, P, and K) of deficiently irrigated wheat plants under soil salinity.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1343–1656 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Coupled compost and PGPR lessened wheat oxidative damage.

Treatment
coupled application of compost and PGPRe0
Interactor
PGPRe0symbiont
Outcome
oxidative damagee1
Direction
lessenede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“coupled application of compost and PGPR”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1347–1386 · show in text ↑
e1

“lessened oxidative damage and improved the nutrient uptake (N, P, and K) of deficiently irrigated wheat plants under soil salinity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1525–1655 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Coupled compost and PGPR improved wheat N, P and K uptake.

Treatment
coupled application of compost and PGPRe0
Interactor
PGPRe0symbiont
Outcome
nutrient uptake (N, P, and K)e1
Direction
improvede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“coupled application of compost and PGPR”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1347–1386 · show in text ↑
e1

“improved the nutrient uptake (N, P, and K) of deficiently irrigated wheat plants under soil salinity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1555–1655 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend compost with PGPR to protect wheat from water stress and soil salinity.

Interactor
PGPRe0symbiont
Outcome
co-application of compost with PGPRe0
Qualifier
water stress and soil salinitye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“to protect wheat plants from environmental stressors, such as water stress and soil salinity, co-application of compost with PGPR was found to be effective.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1679–1835 · show in text ↑

fertilization · physiology: gas exchange · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

19 papers: 18 positive, 1 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

fertilization · physiology: osmolytes · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

28 papers: 24 positive, 4 negative or no effect

23 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

24 papers more in this group

See all 28 papers →

fertilization · physiology: oxidative · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

33 papers: 32 positive, 1 negative or no effect

31 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

29 papers more in this group

See all 33 papers →

fertilization · physiology: antioxidant enzymes · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

34 papers: 32 positive, 2 negative or no effect

31 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

30 papers more in this group

See all 34 papers →

inoculation · physiology: antioxidant enzymes · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

47 papers: 44 positive, 3 negative or no effect

43 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

43 papers more in this group

See all 47 papers →

inoculation · physiology: oxidative · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

50 papers: 47 positive, 3 negative or no effect

46 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

46 papers more in this group

See all 50 papers →

inoculation · physiology: pigments · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

82 papers: 76 positive, 6 negative or no effect

75 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

78 papers more in this group

See all 82 papers →

fertilization · physiology: pigments · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

134 papers: 123 positive, 11 negative or no effect

122 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

130 papers more in this group

See all 134 papers →

8 of 18 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.