Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Straw, manure and nothing treatments did not differ in the proportion of phylloplane residents producing chitinase, siderophores or antibiotics.

A claim from The effect of incorporating straw or manure into the soil on the natural microflora of winter wheat · 2001

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Straw, manure and nothing treatments did not differ in the proportion of phylloplane residents producing chitinase, siderophores or antibiotics.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
straw, cattle manure or nothinge0
Outcome
proportion of phylloplane residents able to produce chitinase, siderophores or antibioticse4
Direction
no differencese4
Comparator
between treatmentse4

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Over 3 years, five crops of winter wheat with different fertilization or pesticide treatments were grown in replicated plots in which straw, cattle manure or nothing was incorporated into the soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–196
e4

“no differences were demonstrated between treatments in the proportion of phylloplane residents able to produce chitinase, siderophores or antibiotics”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 588–737

Title

The effect of incorporating straw or manure into the soil on the natural microflora of winter wheat

B. S. Rodgers‐Gray; M. W. Shaw Plant Pathology 2001. doi:10.1046/j.1365-3059.2001.00598.x

Other claims from this paper (11)

Record rev-b9294e1f2ff6356c41d58fd00e40de4147b2dad438326119e10e6af147269691 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

fertilization · physiology: antioxidant enzymes · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

34 papers: 32 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim · 32 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

25 papers more in this group

See all 34 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.