Paper · 2001 · Plant Pathology

The effect of incorporating straw or manure into the soil on the natural microflora of winter wheat

B. S. Rodgers‐Gray; M. W. Shaw

12
claims
24
verbatim quotes
12
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Over 3 years, five crops of winter wheat with different fertilization or pesticide treatments were grown in replicated plots in which straw, cattle manure or nothing was incorporated into the soil. It was previously shown that severities of several foliar diseases were reduced by the treatment with straw. Treatments with straw slightly increased leaf microbial numbers at growth stage (GS) 10, and significantly but slightly decreased numbers at GS 60 and 70, when averaged over all crops. There was no evidence of differences in potential for biological control between plots, because no differences were demonstrated between treatments in the proportion of phylloplane residents able to produce chitinase, siderophores or antibiotics. There was no link between soil and leaf nitrogen and microbial populations or soil amendment. The two youngest leaves of straw‐treated plants remained green longer than leaves from untreated or manure‐treated plants. Microbial numbers differed between crops, but within crops were more stable on leaves and ears than in soil. Soil populations were larger before the crops were sown. Bacteria predominated over fungi in all habitats throughout the growing season. The ratio of Gram‐negative to Gram‐positive bacteria recovered was similar on leaves and in soil, but not on ears. Soil and leaf microbes utilized similar carbon sources. More leaf epiphytes than soil microbes produced siderophores. The majority of identified organisms belonged to only a few species. Chromogenic organisms were more abundant on aerial surfaces. A fungicide, chlorothalonil, was applied in one crop; it reduced the microbial population but did not alter its composition (without affecting the reduction in disease due to straw). It is postulated that straw acts in the field by altering plant physiology and thus altering both microbial colonization and disease.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Straw treatment slightly increased leaf microbial numbers at growth stage 10.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Organ / stage
leafe1
Treatment
strawe1
Outcome
leaf microbial numberse1
Direction
increasede1
Qualifier
at growth stage (GS) 10e1
Comparator
nothing was incorporated into the soile0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Over 3 years, five crops of winter wheat with different fertilization or pesticide treatments were grown in replicated plots in which straw, cattle manure or nothing was incorporated into the soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–196 · show in text ↑
e1

“Treatments with straw slightly increased leaf microbial numbers at growth stage (GS) 10, and significantly but slightly decreased numbers at GS 60 and 70, when averaged over all crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 307–490 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Straw treatment significantly but slightly decreased leaf microbial numbers at growth stages 60 and 70.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
strawe1
Outcome
leaf microbial numberse1
Direction
decreasede1
Qualifier
at GS 60 and 70e1
Comparator
nothing was incorporated into the soile0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Over 3 years, five crops of winter wheat with different fertilization or pesticide treatments were grown in replicated plots in which straw, cattle manure or nothing was incorporated into the soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–196 · show in text ↑
e1

“Treatments with straw slightly increased leaf microbial numbers at growth stage (GS) 10, and significantly but slightly decreased numbers at GS 60 and 70, when averaged over all crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 307–490 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaves of straw-treated plants remained green longer than leaves of untreated plants.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Organ / stage
two youngest leavese3
Treatment
strawe3
Outcome
remained greene3
Direction
longere3
Comparator
untreatede3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Over 3 years, five crops of winter wheat with different fertilization or pesticide treatments were grown in replicated plots in which straw, cattle manure or nothing was incorporated into the soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–196 · show in text ↑
e3

“The two youngest leaves of straw‐treated plants remained green longer than leaves from untreated or manure‐treated plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 833–954 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Straw, manure and nothing treatments did not differ in the proportion of phylloplane residents producing chitinase, siderophores or antibiotics.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
straw, cattle manure or nothinge0
Outcome
proportion of phylloplane residents able to produce chitinase, siderophores or antibioticse4
Direction
no differencese4
Comparator
between treatmentse4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Over 3 years, five crops of winter wheat with different fertilization or pesticide treatments were grown in replicated plots in which straw, cattle manure or nothing was incorporated into the soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–196 · show in text ↑
e4

“no differences were demonstrated between treatments in the proportion of phylloplane residents able to produce chitinase, siderophores or antibiotics”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 588–737 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil and leaf nitrogen were not linked to microbial populations or soil amendment.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Compound
nitrogene5
Outcome
microbial populationse5
Direction
no linke5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Over 3 years, five crops of winter wheat with different fertilization or pesticide treatments were grown in replicated plots in which straw, cattle manure or nothing was incorporated into the soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–196 · show in text ↑
e5

“There was no link between soil and leaf nitrogen and microbial populations or soil amendment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 739–831 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Microbial numbers were more stable within crops on leaves and ears than in soil.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Organ / stage
leaves and earse6
Outcome
Microbial numberse6
Direction
more stablee6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Over 3 years, five crops of winter wheat with different fertilization or pesticide treatments were grown in replicated plots in which straw, cattle manure or nothing was incorporated into the soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–196 · show in text ↑
e6

“Microbial numbers differed between crops, but within crops were more stable on leaves and ears than in soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 956–1063 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacteria predominated over fungi in all habitats throughout the growing season.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Outcome
Bacteria predominated over fungie7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Over 3 years, five crops of winter wheat with different fertilization or pesticide treatments were grown in replicated plots in which straw, cattle manure or nothing was incorporated into the soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–196 · show in text ↑
e7

“Bacteria predominated over fungi in all habitats throughout the growing season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1122–1200 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

More leaf epiphytes than soil microbes produced siderophores.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Organ / stage
leaf epiphytese2
Outcome
produced siderophorese2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Over 3 years, five crops of winter wheat with different fertilization or pesticide treatments were grown in replicated plots in which straw, cattle manure or nothing was incorporated into the soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–196 · show in text ↑
e2

“More leaf epiphytes than soil microbes produced siderophores”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1373–1433 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chromogenic organisms were more abundant on aerial surfaces.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Organ / stage
aerial surfacese1
Outcome
Chromogenic organismse1
Direction
more abundante1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Over 3 years, five crops of winter wheat with different fertilization or pesticide treatments were grown in replicated plots in which straw, cattle manure or nothing was incorporated into the soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–196 · show in text ↑
e1

“Chromogenic organisms were more abundant on aerial surfaces”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1504–1563 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chlorothalonil reduced the microbial population on wheat.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
chlorothalonile1
Outcome
microbial populatione1
Direction
reducede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Over 3 years, five crops of winter wheat with different fertilization or pesticide treatments were grown in replicated plots in which straw, cattle manure or nothing was incorporated into the soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–196 · show in text ↑
e1

“A fungicide, chlorothalonil, was applied in one crop; it reduced the microbial population but did not alter its composition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1565–1688 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chlorothalonil did not alter the composition of the microbial population.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
chlorothalonile1
Outcome
compositione1
Direction
did not altere1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Over 3 years, five crops of winter wheat with different fertilization or pesticide treatments were grown in replicated plots in which straw, cattle manure or nothing was incorporated into the soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–196 · show in text ↑
e1

“A fungicide, chlorothalonil, was applied in one crop; it reduced the microbial population but did not alter its composition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1565–1688 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Straw is postulated to act by altering plant physiology and thereby microbial colonization and disease.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
strawe1
Outcome
microbial colonization and diseasee1
Qualifier
altering plant physiologye1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Over 3 years, five crops of winter wheat with different fertilization or pesticide treatments were grown in replicated plots in which straw, cattle manure or nothing was incorporated into the soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–196 · show in text ↑
e1

“It is postulated that straw acts in the field by altering plant physiology and thus altering both microbial colonization and disease”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1748–1880 · show in text ↑

fertilization · physiology: antioxidant enzymes · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

34 papers: 32 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 32 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

30 papers more in this group

See all 34 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.