Paper · 2023 · International Journal of Environment and Climate Change

Effects of Herbicides and Nano Urea Mixture on Weeds, Yield Attributes and Yield of Wheat (Triticum aestivum)

Mo Asif; Todar Mal Poonia; Virender Singh Hooda; et al.

10
claims
20
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Wheat (Triticum aestivum) is second most important staple crop in India after rice. Weeds have emerged as the major biotic stress in wheat. Post-emergence herbicidal combinations are used widely to control the complex weed flora in wheat crops. A field experiment was carried out to study the “Effects of herbicides and nano urea mixture on weeds, yield attributes and yield of wheat (Triticum aestivum)”. The experiment was performed in randomized blocked design with three replications and fourteen treatments in Rabi season 2022-23 at Agronomy Research Farm, CCS Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar. Significantly minimum weed count (1.52 m-2) and dry weight (1.49 g m-2) and maximum weed control efficiency (88.6%) of Phalaris minor and broadleaved weeds (87%) was recorded with application of clodinafop + metribuzin 60 + 210 g ha-1 with nano urea 3 ml L-1 followed by clodinafop + metribuzin 60 + 210 g ha-1 at 90 DAS. In case of yield attributes i.e. number of effective tillers per meter row length (92.5), spike length (11.4 cm), number of grains spike-1 (55.9) and 1000-grain weight (43.8) were higher with application of clodinafop + metribuzin 60 + 210 g ha-1 with nano urea 3 ml L-1 followed by clodinafop + metribuzin 60 + 210 g ha-1. Grain yield (5876 kg ha-1) and B:C (1.94) was recorded higher with application of clodinafop + metribuzin 60 + 210 g ha-1 with nano urea 3 ml L-1 followed by clodinafop + metribuzin 60 + 210 g ha-1 which was significantly higher than weedy check but at par with the weed free treatment.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The mixture produced the minimum weed count of 1.52 m-2.

Treatment
clodinafop + metribuzin 60 + 210 g ha-1 with nano urea 3 ml L-1e0
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
weed counte0
Direction
minimume0
Value
1.52 m-2e0
Comparator
clodinafop + metribuzin 60 + 210 g ha-1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Significantly minimum weed count (1.52 m-2) and dry weight (1.49 g m-2) and maximum weed control efficiency (88.6%) of Phalaris minor and broadleaved weeds (87%) was recorded with application of clodinafop + metribuzin 60 + 210 g ha-1 with nano urea 3 ml L-1 followed by clodinafop + metribuzin 60 + 210 g ha-1 at 90 DAS.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 606–927 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–109 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The mixture produced minimum weed dry weight of 1.49 g m-2.

Treatment
clodinafop + metribuzin 60 + 210 g ha-1 with nano urea 3 ml L-1e0
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
dry weighte0
Direction
minimume0
Value
1.49 g m-2e0
Comparator
clodinafop + metribuzin 60 + 210 g ha-1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Significantly minimum weed count (1.52 m-2) and dry weight (1.49 g m-2) and maximum weed control efficiency (88.6%) of Phalaris minor and broadleaved weeds (87%) was recorded with application of clodinafop + metribuzin 60 + 210 g ha-1 with nano urea 3 ml L-1 followed by clodinafop + metribuzin 60 + 210 g ha-1 at 90 DAS.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 606–927 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–109 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The mixture achieved maximum weed control efficiency of 88.6%.

Treatment
clodinafop + metribuzin 60 + 210 g ha-1 with nano urea 3 ml L-1e0
Interactor
Phalaris minorPhalaris minore0weed
Outcome
weed control efficiencye0
Direction
maximume0
Value
88.6%e0
Comparator
clodinafop + metribuzin 60 + 210 g ha-1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Phalaris minor
Phalaris minor · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMatt Lavin from Bozeman, Montana, USA · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maximum weed control efficiency (88.6%) of Phalaris minor and broadleaved weeds (87%) was recorded with application of clodinafop + metribuzin 60 + 210 g ha-1 with nano urea 3 ml L-1 followed by clodinafop + metribuzin 60 + 210 g ha-1 at 90 DAS.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 682–927 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–109 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Control of broadleaved weeds reached 87% with the mixture.

Treatment
clodinafop + metribuzin 60 + 210 g ha-1 with nano urea 3 ml L-1e0
Interactor
broadleaved weedse0weed
Outcome
broadleaved weedse0
Direction
higherinferrede0
Value
87%e0
Comparator
clodinafop + metribuzin 60 + 210 g ha-1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“broadleaved weeds (87%) was recorded with application of clodinafop + metribuzin 60 + 210 g ha-1 with nano urea 3 ml L-1 followed by clodinafop + metribuzin 60 + 210 g ha-1 at 90 DAS.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 744–927 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–109 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Effective tillers were higher with the mixture, reaching 92.5 per meter row length.

Treatment
clodinafop + metribuzin 60 + 210 g ha-1 with nano urea 3 ml L-1e0
Outcome
number of effective tillers per meter row lengthe0
Direction
highere0
Value
92.5e0
Comparator
clodinafop + metribuzin 60 + 210 g ha-1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“number of effective tillers per meter row length (92.5), spike length (11.4 cm), number of grains spike-1 (55.9) and 1000-grain weight (43.8) were higher with application of clodinafop + metribuzin 60 + 210 g ha-1 with nano urea 3 ml L-1 followed by clodinafop + metribuzin 60 + 210 g ha-1.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 961–1251 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–109 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spike length was higher with the mixture, reaching 11.4 cm.

Treatment
clodinafop + metribuzin 60 + 210 g ha-1 with nano urea 3 ml L-1e0
Outcome
spike lengthe0
Direction
highere0
Value
11.4 cme0
Comparator
clodinafop + metribuzin 60 + 210 g ha-1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“spike length (11.4 cm), number of grains spike-1 (55.9) and 1000-grain weight (43.8) were higher with application of clodinafop + metribuzin 60 + 210 g ha-1 with nano urea 3 ml L-1 followed by clodinafop + metribuzin 60 + 210 g ha-1.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1018–1251 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–109 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grains per spike were higher with the mixture, reaching 55.9.

Treatment
clodinafop + metribuzin 60 + 210 g ha-1 with nano urea 3 ml L-1e0
Outcome
number of grains spike-1e0
Direction
highere0
Value
55.9e0
Comparator
clodinafop + metribuzin 60 + 210 g ha-1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“number of grains spike-1 (55.9) and 1000-grain weight (43.8) were higher with application of clodinafop + metribuzin 60 + 210 g ha-1 with nano urea 3 ml L-1 followed by clodinafop + metribuzin 60 + 210 g ha-1.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1042–1251 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–109 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Thousand-grain weight was higher with the mixture, reaching 43.8.

Treatment
clodinafop + metribuzin 60 + 210 g ha-1 with nano urea 3 ml L-1e0
Outcome
1000-grain weighte0
Direction
highere0
Value
43.8e0
Comparator
clodinafop + metribuzin 60 + 210 g ha-1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“1000-grain weight (43.8) were higher with application of clodinafop + metribuzin 60 + 210 g ha-1 with nano urea 3 ml L-1 followed by clodinafop + metribuzin 60 + 210 g ha-1.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1078–1251 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–109 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain yield was higher with the mixture, reaching 5876 kg ha-1 and exceeding the weedy check significantly.

Treatment
clodinafop + metribuzin 60 + 210 g ha-1 with nano urea 3 ml L-1e0
Outcome
Grain yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
5876 kg ha-1e0
Qualifier
at par with the weed free treatmente0
Comparator
weedy checke0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grain yield (5876 kg ha-1) and B:C (1.94) was recorded higher with application of clodinafop + metribuzin 60 + 210 g ha-1 with nano urea 3 ml L-1 followed by clodinafop + metribuzin 60 + 210 g ha-1 which was significantly higher than weedy check but at par with the weed free treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1252–1538 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–109 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The mixture gave a higher B:C of 1.94.

Treatment
clodinafop + metribuzin 60 + 210 g ha-1 with nano urea 3 ml L-1e0
Outcome
B:Ce0
Direction
highere0
Value
1.94e0
Comparator
clodinafop + metribuzin 60 + 210 g ha-1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“B:C (1.94) was recorded higher with application of clodinafop + metribuzin 60 + 210 g ha-1 with nano urea 3 ml L-1 followed by clodinafop + metribuzin 60 + 210 g ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1283–1449 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–109 · show in text ↑

metribuzin · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

75 papers: 45 positive, 30 negative or no effect

44 papers in the same direction as this paper · 27 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

71 papers more in this group

See all 75 papers →

metribuzin · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 7 positive, 3 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

clodinafop · Phalaris minor · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

25 papers: 23 positive, 2 negative or no effect

22 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

21 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

clodinafop · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

60 papers: 57 positive, 3 negative or no effect

56 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

56 papers more in this group

See all 60 papers →

clodinafop · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

61 papers: 54 positive, 7 negative or no effect

53 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

57 papers more in this group

See all 61 papers →

metribuzin · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

63 papers: 60 positive, 3 negative or no effect

59 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

59 papers more in this group

See all 63 papers →

clodinafop · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

10 papers: 10 positive, 0 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

metribuzin · Phalaris minor · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

18 papers: 18 positive, 0 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

8 of 15 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.