Abstract
Field experiments were conducted in three successive seasons (Rabi 2010–11, 2011–12 and 2012–13) to evaluate the efficacy of clodinafop-propargyl formulations (wettable powder and emulsifiable concentrate) applied as post-emergence against Phalaris minor in wheat crop. All formulations of herbicide reduced the density of Phalaris minor over the weedy check however treated plots yielded below than the state average yield of wheat crop. These new clodinafop formulations/brands failed to provide effective control of resistant P. minor prevailing in wheat field during all years, and gave only 2732% control of Phalaris minor over the weedy check. These new formulations also yielded similar to clodinafop-p-propargyl applied as standard check. Per cent control of Phalaris minor was found to be reduced from 60 to 40% over unsprayed check with delay in application time of clodinafop from 35 to 60 DAS.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 6
Claim · model-written summary
All herbicide formulations reduced Phalaris minor density relative to the weedy check.
- Taxon
- wheat crop
Triticum aestivume0 - Treatment
- All formulations of herbicidee0
- Interactor
- Phalaris minor
.jpg?width=60)
Phalaris minore0weed - Outcome
- density of Phalaris minore0
- Direction
- reducede0
- Comparator
- weedy checke0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“All formulations of herbicide reduced the density of Phalaris minor over the weedy check however treated plots yielded below than the state average yield of wheat crop.”
Claim · model-written summary
Treated wheat plots yielded below the state average.
- Taxon
- wheat cropTriticum aestivume0
- Outcome
- treated plots yieldede0
- Direction
- belowe0
- Comparator
- state average yield of wheat crope0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“All formulations of herbicide reduced the density of Phalaris minor over the weedy check however treated plots yielded below than the state average yield of wheat crop.”
Claim · model-written summary
New clodinafop formulations failed to control resistant P. minor effectively across all years.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- clodinafop formulations/brandse0
- Interactor
- P. minorPhalaris minore0weed
- Outcome
- control of resistant P. minore0
- Direction
- failed to provide effective controle0
- Setting
- wheat fielde0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“wheat”
e0“These new clodinafop formulations/brands failed to provide effective control of resistant P. minor prevailing in wheat field during all years”
Claim · model-written summary
New formulations gave only 2732% control of Phalaris minor versus the weedy check, as printed.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- new formulationse0
- Interactor
- Phalaris minorPhalaris minore1weed
- Outcome
- control of Phalaris minore1
- Direction
- onlye1
- Value
- 2732%e1
- Comparator
- weedy checke1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“wheat”
e0“These new formulations also yielded similar to clodinafop-p-propargyl applied as standard check. Per cent control of Phalaris minor was found to be reduced from 60 to 40% over unsprayed check with delay in application time of clodinafop from 35 to 60 DAS.”
e1“and gave only 2732% control of Phalaris minor over the weedy check.”
Claim · model-written summary
New formulations yielded similarly to the standard clodinafop-p-propargyl check.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- new formulationse0
- Outcome
- yieldede0
- Direction
- similare0
- Comparator
- clodinafop-p-propargyl applied as standard checke0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“wheat”
e0“These new formulations also yielded similar to clodinafop-p-propargyl applied as standard check.”
Claim · model-written summary
Delaying clodinafop application from 35 to 60 DAS reduced Phalaris minor control from 60 to 40% versus the unsprayed check.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- delay in application time of clodinafop from 35 to 60 DASe0
- Interactor
- Phalaris minorPhalaris minore0weed
- Outcome
- Per cent control of Phalaris minore0
- Direction
- reducede0
- Value
- 60 to 40%e0
- Comparator
- unsprayed checke0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“wheat”
e0“Per cent control of Phalaris minor was found to be reduced from 60 to 40% over unsprayed check with delay in application time of clodinafop from 35 to 60 DAS.”
The same questions in other papers
clodinafop · Phalaris minor · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 23 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
21 papers more in this group
See all 25 papers →herbicide · Phalaris minor · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
36 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- positive
35 papers more in this group
See all 39 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.