Paper · 2003 · Indian Journal of Weed Science

Management of Phalaris minor in Wheat through Integrated Approach

Parminder S. Chahal; H. S. Brar; U. S. Walia

8
claims
13
verbatim quotes
14
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted at experimental farm of Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana during 1999–2000 and 2000–01 crop season to study the effect of agronomic manipulations on Phalaris minor. The studies envisaged that the wheat crop grown under deep tillage system done with mould board plough had 13.7 and 40% less population and dry maller of Phalaris minor, respectively and thus gave 18.2% higher grain yield over zero tillage system. Closer row spacing of 15 cm resulted in less plant population and dry maller of P. minor and gave 8% more grain yield as compared to normal spacing of 22.5 cm because of better canopy coverage over the weeds. Further, the application of clodinafop (60 g ha−1) reduced the population and dry maller accumulation of P. minor by 92.5 and 90.6%, respectively, and hence resulted 53.9% higher grain yield over unweeded check due to selective kill of this weed.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Deep tillage reduced Phalaris minor population by 13.7% versus zero tillage.

Treatment
deep tillage system done with mould board ploughe0
Interactor
Phalaris minorPhalaris minore0weed
Outcome
populatione0
Direction
lesse0
Value
13.7e0
Comparator
zero tillage systeme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Phalaris minor
Phalaris minor · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMatt Lavin from Bozeman, Montana, USA · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“wheat crop grown under deep tillage system done with mould board plough had 13.7 and 40% less population and dry maller of Phalaris minor, respectively and thus gave 18.2% higher grain yield over zero tillage system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 236–451 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Deep tillage reduced Phalaris minor dry matter by 40% versus zero tillage.

Treatment
deep tillage system done with mould board ploughe0
Interactor
Phalaris minorPhalaris minore0weed
Outcome
dry maller of Phalaris minore0
Direction
lesse0
Value
40%e0
Comparator
zero tillage systeme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Phalaris minor
Phalaris minor · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMatt Lavin from Bozeman, Montana, USA · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“wheat crop grown under deep tillage system done with mould board plough had 13.7 and 40% less population and dry maller of Phalaris minor, respectively and thus gave 18.2% higher grain yield over zero tillage system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 236–451 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Deep tillage increased wheat grain yield by 18.2% versus zero tillage.

Treatment
deep tillage system done with mould board ploughe0
Interactor
Phalaris minorPhalaris minore0weed
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
18.2%e0
Comparator
zero tillage systeme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Phalaris minor
Phalaris minor · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMatt Lavin from Bozeman, Montana, USA · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“wheat crop grown under deep tillage system done with mould board plough had 13.7 and 40% less population and dry maller of Phalaris minor, respectively and thus gave 18.2% higher grain yield over zero tillage system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 236–451 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fifteen-centimeter rows reduced P. minor population and dry matter versus 22.5-centimeter rows.

Treatment
Closer row spacing of 15 cme0
Interactor
P. minorPhalaris minore0weed
Outcome
plant population and dry maller of P. minore0
Direction
lesse0
Comparator
normal spacing of 22.5 cme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Phalaris minor
Phalaris minor · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMatt Lavin from Bozeman, Montana, USA · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Closer row spacing of 15 cm resulted in less plant population and dry maller of P. minor and gave 8% more grain yield as compared to normal spacing of 22.5 cm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 453–611 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–37 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fifteen-centimeter rows increased wheat grain yield by 8% versus 22.5-centimeter rows.

Treatment
Closer row spacing of 15 cme0
Interactor
P. minorPhalaris minore0weed
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
moree0
Value
8%e0
Comparator
normal spacing of 22.5 cme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Phalaris minor
Phalaris minor · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMatt Lavin from Bozeman, Montana, USA · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Closer row spacing of 15 cm resulted in less plant population and dry maller of P. minor and gave 8% more grain yield as compared to normal spacing of 22.5 cm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 453–611 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–37 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Clodinafop reduced P. minor population by 92.5% versus unweeded check.

Treatment
clodinafop (60 g ha−1)e0
Interactor
P. minorPhalaris minore0weed
Outcome
populatione0
Direction
reducede0
Value
92.5e0
Comparator
unweeded checke0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Phalaris minor
Phalaris minor · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMatt Lavin from Bozeman, Montana, USA · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of clodinafop (60 g ha−1) reduced the population and dry maller accumulation of P. minor by 92.5 and 90.6%, respectively, and hence resulted 53.9% higher grain yield over unweeded check”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 675–872 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–37 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Clodinafop reduced P. minor dry matter by 90.6% versus unweeded check.

Treatment
clodinafop (60 g ha−1)e0
Interactor
P. minorPhalaris minore0weed
Outcome
dry maller accumulation of P. minore0
Direction
reducede0
Value
90.6%e0
Comparator
unweeded checke0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Phalaris minor
Phalaris minor · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMatt Lavin from Bozeman, Montana, USA · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of clodinafop (60 g ha−1) reduced the population and dry maller accumulation of P. minor by 92.5 and 90.6%, respectively, and hence resulted 53.9% higher grain yield over unweeded check”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 675–872 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–37 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Clodinafop increased wheat grain yield by 53.9% versus unweeded check.

Treatment
clodinafop (60 g ha−1)e0
Interactor
P. minorPhalaris minore0weed
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
53.9%e0
Comparator
unweeded checke0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Phalaris minor
Phalaris minor · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMatt Lavin from Bozeman, Montana, USA · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of clodinafop (60 g ha−1) reduced the population and dry maller accumulation of P. minor by 92.5 and 90.6%, respectively, and hence resulted 53.9% higher grain yield over unweeded check”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 675–872 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–37 · show in text ↑

clodinafop · Phalaris minor · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

25 papers: 23 positive, 2 negative or no effect

22 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

21 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

tillage · Phalaris minor · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

29 papers: 25 positive, 4 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

25 papers more in this group

See all 29 papers →

density · Phalaris minor · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.