Paper · 2004

Weed management in Zero-till sown wheat

AK Bhardwaj; Singh, Ram Kumar; SP Singh; et al.

5
claims
9
verbatim quotes
10
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Higher weed density and population of Phalaris minor were recorded in conventional tillage than zero tillage. Pre-sowing paraquat application had marked effect on weed growth in zero tillage. Maximum reduction in weed density was obtained with the application of 2, 4–0 and isoproturon (500 g+1000 g ha−1) as mixture under ZT and CT system. Higher average grain yield was achieved under zero tillage wheat with pre-sowing paraquat (500 g ha−1) application and post-emergence isoproturon (1000 g ha−1) or mixed application of 2, 4–0 and isoproturon (500 g+ I000 g ha−1). Yield achieved in zero tillage without any herbicide application was comparable to conventional tillage with isoproturon application.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed density and Phalaris minor population were higher under conventional tillage than zero tillage.

Treatment
conventional tillagee0
Interactor
Phalaris minorPhalaris minore0weed
Outcome
weed density and population of Phalaris minore0
Direction
Highere0
Comparator
zero tillagee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Phalaris minor
Phalaris minor · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMatt Lavin from Bozeman, Montana, USA · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“sown wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–39 · show in text ↑
e0

“Higher weed density and population of Phalaris minor were recorded in conventional tillage than zero tillage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–108 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pre-sowing paraquat application had a marked effect on weed growth under zero tillage.

Treatment
Pre-sowing paraquat applicatione0
Outcome
weed growthe0
Setting
zero tillagee0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“sown wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–39 · show in text ↑
e0

“Pre-sowing paraquat application had marked effect on weed growth in zero tillage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 110–190 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The largest reduction in weed density came from the 2,4-D plus isoproturon mixture (500 g + 1000 g/ha) under both zero and conventional tillage.

Treatment
2, 4–0 and isoproturon (500 g+1000 g ha−1)e0
Outcome
weed densitye0
Direction
reductione0
Setting
ZT and CT systeme0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“sown wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–39 · show in text ↑
e0

“Maximum reduction in weed density was obtained with the application of 2, 4–0 and isoproturon (500 g+1000 g ha−1) as mixture under ZT and CT system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 192–339 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Average grain yield of zero-tillage wheat was higher with pre-sowing paraquat plus post-emergence isoproturon, or with the 2,4-D plus isoproturon mixture.

Treatment
pre-sowing paraquat (500 g ha−1) application and post-emergence isoproturon (1000 g ha−1)e0
Outcome
average grain yielde0
Direction
Highere0
Setting
zero tillagee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Higher average grain yield was achieved under zero tillage wheat with pre-sowing paraquat (500 g ha−1) application and post-emergence isoproturon (1000 g ha−1) or mixed application of 2, 4–0 and isoproturon (500 g+ I000 g ha−1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 341–568 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield in zero tillage without herbicide was comparable to conventional tillage with isoproturon.

Treatment
zero tillage without any herbicide applicatione0
Outcome
Yielde0
Direction
comparablee0
Comparator
conventional tillage with isoproturon applicatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“sown wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–39 · show in text ↑
e0

“Yield achieved in zero tillage without any herbicide application was comparable to conventional tillage with isoproturon application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 570–702 · show in text ↑

isoproturon · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

89 papers: 75 positive, 14 negative or no effect

74 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

85 papers more in this group

See all 89 papers →

paraquat · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 5 positive, 3 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

isoproturon · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

74 papers: 72 positive, 2 negative or no effect

71 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

70 papers more in this group

See all 74 papers →

tillage · Phalaris minor · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

29 papers: 25 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 25 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

25 papers more in this group

See all 29 papers →

herbicide · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

563 papers: 466 positive, 97 negative or no effect

465 papers in the same direction as this paper · 87 in the opposite direction · 10 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

559 papers more in this group

See all 563 papers →

tillage · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

1,414 papers: 1,116 positive, 298 negative or no effect

297 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1,116 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

1,410 papers more in this group

See all 1,414 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.