Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Weed-free treatment (T5) gave the highest grain yield of wheat, 5033.33 kg ha-1.

A claim from Effect of sowing methods and weed management on growth yield attributes and yield of wheat in Chhattisgarh plains · 2020

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed-free treatment (T5) gave the highest grain yield of wheat, 5033.33 kg ha-1.

Treatment
weed free (T5)e2
Outcome
grain yielde2
Direction
produced higheste2
Value
5033.33 kg ha-1e2

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“The weed management treatment i.e., weed free (T5) produced highest grain yield (5033.33 kg ha-1 followed by T1 (clodinafop + metsulfuron + surfactant) with 4777.78 kg ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1299–1471
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–90

Title

Effect of sowing methods and weed management on growth yield attributes and yield of wheat in Chhattisgarh plains

Ritesh Kumar Singh; Anil Dixit; RK Shukla; et al. International Journal of Chemical Studies 2020. doi:10.22271/chemi.2020.v8.i3ad.9519

Other claims from this paper (10)

Record rev-752c42cfc6f99b5d2d3d399c0452eccad2506935a9e2f8299b974950029eff39 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

herbicide · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

563 papers: 466 positive, 97 negative or no effect

465 papers in the same direction as this claim · 87 in the opposite direction · 10 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
    Average grain yield of zero-tillage wheat was higher with pre-sowing paraquat plus post-emergence isoproturon, or with the 2,4-D plus isoproturon mixture.

    Weed management in Zero-till sown wheat · 2004

    Same directionCited by this paper

  2. negative
    Herbicide application to the culm affected the ear and biased the final grain weight.

    Photosynthetic contribution of the ear to grain filling in wheat: a comparison of different methodologies for evaluation · 2016

    Opposite direction

  3. no effect
    Alternative PRE herbicides did not reduce crop yield.

    Control of Rigid Ryegrass in Australian Wheat Production with Pyroxasulfone · 2014

    Opposite direction

  4. no effect
    Grain yield did not differ significantly between the treatments.

    Impact of site-specific weed management on herbicide savings and winter wheat yield · 2013 · compared with the treatments

    Opposite direction

  5. no effect
    All weed management treatments gave similar gross returns for each crop and for the rotation.

    Evaluation of alternative weed management systems in a modified no-tillage corn–soybean–winter wheat rotation: weed densities, crop yield, and economics · 2002

    Opposite direction

  6. negative
    Wheat yield loss rose with herbicide rate.

    Wheat Response to Simulated Drift of Glyphosate and Imazamox Applied at Two Growth Stages · 2006

    Opposite direction

  7. negative
    The herbicide mixture tended to reduce wheat yield by 0.6 t ha(-1) in one trial.

    Estimating economic thresholds for site‐specific weed control using manual weed counts and sensor technology: An example based on three winter wheat trials · 2013

    Opposite direction

  8. negative
    Metribuzin injury significantly reduced wheat yield across application stages.

    Alternatives to Diclofop for the Control of Italian Ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum) in Winter Wheat (Triticum aestivum)1 · 2003

    Opposite direction

554 papers more in this group

See all 563 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.