Paper · 2013 · Pest Management Science

Estimating economic thresholds for site‐specific weed control using manual weed counts and sensor technology: An example based on three winter wheat trials

Martina Keller; Christoph Gutjahr; Jens Möhring; et al.

10
claims
20
verbatim quotes
33
citations
4
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Precision experimental design uses the natural heterogeneity of agricultural fields and combines sensor technology with linear mixed models to estimate the effect of weeds, soil properties and herbicide on yield. These estimates can be used to derive economic thresholds. Three field trials are presented using the precision experimental design in winter wheat. Weed densities were determined by manual sampling and bi-spectral cameras, yield and soil properties were mapped. RESULTS: Galium aparine, other broad-leaved weeds and Alopecurus myosuroides reduced yield by 17.5, 1.2 and 12.4 kg ha(-1) plant(-1) m(2) in one trial. The determined thresholds for site-specific weed control with independently applied herbicides were 4, 48 and 12 plants m(-2), respectively. Spring drought reduced yield effects of weeds considerably in one trial, since water became yield limiting. A negative herbicide effect on the crop was negligible, except in one trial, in which the herbicide mixture tended to reduce yield by 0.6 t ha(-1). Bi-spectral cameras for weed counting were of limited use and still need improvement. Nevertheless, large weed patches were correctly identified. CONCLUSION: The current paper presents a new approach to conducting field trials and deriving decision rules for weed control in farmers' fields.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Galium aparine reduced wheat yield by 17.5 kg ha(-1) plant(-1) m(2).

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Interactor
Galium aparineGalium aparinee0weed
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
reducede0
Value
17.5e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Galium aparine
Galium aparine · InteractorAlvesgaspar · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Galium aparine, other broad-leaved weeds and Alopecurus myosuroides reduced yield by 17.5, 1.2 and 12.4 kg ha(-1) plant(-1) m(2) in one trial.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 497–639 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 136–148 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Other broad-leaved weeds reduced wheat yield by 1.2 kg ha(-1) plant(-1) m(2).

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Interactor
other broad-leaved weedse0weed
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
reducede0
Value
1.2e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Galium aparine, other broad-leaved weeds and Alopecurus myosuroides reduced yield by 17.5, 1.2 and 12.4 kg ha(-1) plant(-1) m(2) in one trial.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 497–639 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 136–148 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Alopecurus myosuroides reduced wheat yield by 12.4 kg ha(-1) plant(-1) m(2).

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Interactor
Alopecurus myosuroidesAlopecurus myosuroidese0weed
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
reducede0
Value
12.4 kg ha(-1) plant(-1) m(2)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Alopecurus myosuroides
Alopecurus myosuroides · InteractorOliver Macdonald Maccheek · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Galium aparine, other broad-leaved weeds and Alopecurus myosuroides reduced yield by 17.5, 1.2 and 12.4 kg ha(-1) plant(-1) m(2) in one trial.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 497–639 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 136–148 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The Galium aparine control threshold was 4 plants m(-2).

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
thresholds for site-specific weed controle0
Value
4e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The determined thresholds for site-specific weed control with independently applied herbicides were 4, 48 and 12 plants m(-2), respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 640–780 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 136–148 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The broad-leaved weed control threshold was 48 plants m(-2).

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
thresholds for site-specific weed controle0
Value
48e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The determined thresholds for site-specific weed control with independently applied herbicides were 4, 48 and 12 plants m(-2), respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 640–780 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 136–148 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The Alopecurus control threshold was 12 plants m(-2).

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
thresholds for site-specific weed controle0
Value
12 plants m(-2)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The determined thresholds for site-specific weed control with independently applied herbicides were 4, 48 and 12 plants m(-2), respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 640–780 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 136–148 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spring drought considerably reduced weed effects on yield.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
yield effects of weedse0
Direction
reducede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Spring drought reduced yield effects of weeds considerably in one trial”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 781–852 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 136–148 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The herbicide mixture tended to reduce wheat yield by 0.6 t ha(-1) in one trial.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
herbicide mixturee0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
reducee0
Value
0.6 t ha(-1)e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the herbicide mixture tended to reduce yield by 0.6 t ha(-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 975–1035 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 136–148 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bi-spectral cameras had limited utility for weed counting.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
weed countinge0

Not reportedComparatorValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Bi-spectral cameras for weed counting were of limited use and still need improvement.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1037–1122 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 136–148 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bi-spectral cameras correctly found large weed patches.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
large weed patches were correctly identifiede0

Not reportedComparatorValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“large weed patches were correctly identified.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1137–1182 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 136–148 · show in text ↑

herbicide · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

563 papers: 466 positive, 97 negative or no effect

96 papers in the same direction as this paper · 466 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

559 papers more in this group

See all 563 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.