Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Strict summer weed control produced high investment returns, ranging 6–1328%.

A claim from Re-evaluating the contribution of summer fallow rain to wheat yield in southern Australia · 2011

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Strict summer weed control produced high investment returns, ranging 6–1328%.

Treatment
strict summer weed controle0
Outcome
return on investmente0
Direction
highe0
Value
6–1328%e0
Qualifier
mean 733%e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“strict summer weed control generated high return on investment (range 6–1328%; mean 733%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1844–1933
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–61

Title

Re-evaluating the contribution of summer fallow rain to wheat yield in southern Australia

J. R. Hunt; J. A. Kirkegaard Crop and Pasture Science 2011. doi:10.1071/cp11268

Other claims from this paper (9)

Record rev-64aed2afe2745d95ee9cc4aedd6bf7211b4c2c514d415852ce3acae4f334a335 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 8 in the model’s answer

herbicide · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

563 papers: 466 positive, 97 negative or no effect

465 papers in the same direction as this claim · 87 in the opposite direction · 10 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. negative

554 papers more in this group

See all 563 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.