Claim · model-written summary
In the wheat-sorghum part of the rotation, paraquat or glyphosate alone gave the lowest yields because of poor weed control.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivume3 - Treatment
- paraquat or glyphosate alonee3
- Outcome
- yieldse3
- Direction
- loweste3
- Qualifier
- because of poor weed controle3
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValue
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e3“In the wheat‐sorghum part of the rotation, using paraquat or glyphosate alone resulted in lowest yields because of poor weed control”
Title
Effectiveness and Economics of Dryland Conservation Tillage Systems in the Southern Great Plains
A. F. Wiese; W. L. Harman; B. W. Bean; et al. Agronomy Journal 1994. doi:10.2134/agronj1994.00021962008600040026x
Other claims from this paper (8)
- Intervention effect In continuous winter wheat, sweep plowing yielded significantly less (425 kg ha -1) than the best no-tillage treatment in 2 of 4 years.
- Intervention effect In the fallow period between sorghum and wheat, sweep plowing yielded significantly less than the best no-tillage in 2 of 4 years, an average of 275 kg ha -1.
- Intervention effect In continuous winter wheat, sweeping was the most profitable option in the short term because of low variable costs.
- Intervention effect In continuous winter wheat, sweep tillage followed by glyphosate lost the least money when machinery depreciation was considered.
- Intervention effect In the fallow period, sweep plowing was the most profitable option in the short run at $84 per ha.
- Intervention effect In the long run, sweep plowing was $3 ha -1 less profitable than sweep plowing followed by glyphosate.
- Intervention effect In the wheat-sorghum part, sweep plowing yielded less than the best no-tillage in 1 of 4 years.
- Intervention effect In the wheat-sorghum part, sweep plowing was the most profitable option in both the short and long term because of lower costs.