Paper · 2005 · Indian Journal of Weed Science

Weed Control Efficacy of Herbicides in Zero Till Wheat

U. S. Walia; Manpreet Singh; L. S. Brar

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
8
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Field experiments were conducted at the experimental farm of the Department of Agronomy and Agromet., PAU, Ludhiana. during 2003–04 and 2004–05. The experimental field was sandy-loam in texture with 72.7% sand, 11.7% silt and 15.6% clay and was under rice-wheat sequence from last many years. Wheat sown with zero till technique after the spray of paraquat recorded significantly less dry matter of Phalaris minor as compared to conventional till sown crop. Also the dry matter of broadleaf weeds was found to be significantly higher in zero till sown crop without paraquat application than the other tillage treatments. Mesosulfuron+iodosulfuron 12 or 15 g ha−1 and sulfosulfuron 25 g ha−1 provided effective control of P minor and broadleaf weeds. whereas clodinafop 60 g ha−1 and fenoxaprop-p-ethyl 100 g ha−1 controlled only P minor. Significantly higher grain yield was recorded in zero till sown crop after spraying paraquat than zero till without paraquat spray as well as conventional tillage treatments and the former treatment gave 15.8% higher yield than the latter ones. On an average of two years. highest grain yield (4266 kg ha−1) was recorded in meso+iodo 15 g ha−1 and it was followed by sulfosulfuron. fenoxaprop-p-ethyl fb 2, 4-D and clodinafop fb 2, 4-D, respectively.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Zero till wheat after paraquat had significantly less Phalaris minor dry matter than conventional till wheat.

Treatment
zero till technique after the spray of paraquate0
Interactor
Phalaris minorPhalaris minore0weed
Outcome
dry matter of Phalaris minore0
Direction
lesse0
Comparator
conventional till sown crope0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Phalaris minor
Phalaris minor · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMatt Lavin from Bozeman, Montana, USA · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–54 · show in text ↑
e0

“Wheat sown with zero till technique after the spray of paraquat recorded significantly less dry matter of Phalaris minor as compared to conventional till sown crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 293–456 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Broadleaf weed dry matter was significantly higher with zero till without paraquat than other tillage treatments.

Treatment
zero till sown crop without paraquat applicatione0
Interactor
broadleaf weedse0weed
Outcome
dry matter of broadleaf weedse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
other tillage treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–54 · show in text ↑
e0

“dry matter of broadleaf weeds was found to be significantly higher in zero till sown crop without paraquat application than the other tillage treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 467–619 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mesosulfuron plus iodosulfuron effectively controlled P minor and broadleaf weeds.

Treatment
Mesosulfuron+iodosulfuron 12 or 15 g ha−1e0
Interactor
P minorPhalaris minore0weed
Second interactor
broadleaf weedse0weed
Outcome
effective control of P minor and broadleaf weedse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Phalaris minor
Phalaris minor · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMatt Lavin from Bozeman, Montana, USA · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–54 · show in text ↑
e0

“Mesosulfuron+iodosulfuron 12 or 15 g ha−1 and sulfosulfuron 25 g ha−1 provided effective control of P minor and broadleaf weeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 621–748 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulfosulfuron effectively controlled P minor and broadleaf weeds.

Treatment
sulfosulfuron 25 g ha−1e0
Interactor
P minorPhalaris minore0weed
Second interactor
broadleaf weedse0weed
Outcome
effective control of P minor and broadleaf weedse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Phalaris minor
Phalaris minor · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMatt Lavin from Bozeman, Montana, USA · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–54 · show in text ↑
e0

“sulfosulfuron 25 g ha−1 provided effective control of P minor and broadleaf weeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 667–748 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Clodinafop controlled only P minor.

Treatment
clodinafop 60 g ha−1e0
Interactor
P minorPhalaris minore0weed
Outcome
controlled only P minore0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Phalaris minor
Phalaris minor · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMatt Lavin from Bozeman, Montana, USA · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–54 · show in text ↑
e0

“clodinafop 60 g ha−1 and fenoxaprop-p-ethyl 100 g ha−1 controlled only P minor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 758–836 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fenoxaprop-p-ethyl controlled only P minor.

Treatment
fenoxaprop-p-ethyl 100 g ha−1e0
Interactor
P minorPhalaris minore0weed
Outcome
controlled only P minore0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Phalaris minor
Phalaris minor · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMatt Lavin from Bozeman, Montana, USA · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–54 · show in text ↑
e0

“fenoxaprop-p-ethyl 100 g ha−1 controlled only P minor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 783–836 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Zero till after paraquat yielded significantly more grain than zero till without paraquat and conventional tillage, by 15.8%.

Treatment
zero till sown crop after spraying paraquate0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
15.8%e0
Comparator
zero till without paraquat spray as well as conventional tillage treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–54 · show in text ↑
e0

“Significantly higher grain yield was recorded in zero till sown crop after spraying paraquat than zero till without paraquat spray as well as conventional tillage treatments and the former treatment gave 15.8% higher yield than the latter ones”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 838–1081 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Meso+iodo at 15 g ha−1 gave the highest grain yield, 4266 kg ha−1.

Treatment
meso+iodo 15 g ha−1e0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
4266 kg ha−1e0
Comparator
sulfosulfurone0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–54 · show in text ↑
e0

“highest grain yield (4266 kg ha−1) was recorded in meso+iodo 15 g ha−1 and it was followed by sulfosulfuron”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1111–1218 · show in text ↑

paraquat · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

paraquat · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 5 positive, 3 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

clodinafop · Phalaris minor · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

25 papers: 23 positive, 2 negative or no effect

22 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

21 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

tillage · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

183 papers: 126 positive, 57 negative or no effect

56 papers in the same direction as this paper · 126 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

179 papers more in this group

See all 183 papers →

tillage · Phalaris minor · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

29 papers: 25 positive, 4 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

25 papers more in this group

See all 29 papers →

application · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

877 papers: 795 positive, 82 negative or no effect

794 papers in the same direction as this paper · 75 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

873 papers more in this group

See all 877 papers →

tillage · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

1,414 papers: 1,116 positive, 298 negative or no effect

1,115 papers in the same direction as this paper · 257 in the opposite direction · 41 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

1,410 papers more in this group

See all 1,414 papers →

application · Phalaris minor · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.