Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Zero till sowing in standing stubbles raised wheat grain yield.

A claim from Weed dynamics and wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) productivity as influenced by planting techniques and weed control practices. · 2009

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zero till sowing in standing stubbles raised wheat grain yield.

Treatment
zero till sowing in standing stubblese0
Outcome
wheat grain yielde0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“higher wheat grain yield were recorded with zero till sowing in standing stubbles”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 648–729
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 18–46

Title

Weed dynamics and wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) productivity as influenced by planting techniques and weed control practices.

Amandeep Singh Brar; U. S. Walia Indian Journal of Weed Science 2009

Other claims from this paper (11)

Record rev-a4e56dba6b6d79ecaba7c918bc2210b7e587a9b6e03e82a6e6eff29dbafd6536 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

tillage · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

1,414 papers: 1,116 positive, 298 negative or no effect

1,115 papers in the same direction as this claim · 257 in the opposite direction · 41 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
    Zero till after paraquat yielded significantly more grain than zero till without paraquat and conventional tillage, by 15.8%.

    Weed Control Efficacy of Herbicides in Zero Till Wheat · 2005 · compared with zero till without paraquat spray as well as conventional tillage treatments

    Same directionCited by this paper

  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. no effect

1,405 papers more in this group

See all 1,414 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.