Paper · 2001 · Indian Journal of Agronomy

Effect of tillage practices and herbicides on weed dynamics and yield of wheat (Triticum aestivum) under transplanted rice (Oryza sativa)-wheat system in Vertisols

J.S. MISHRA; V.P. SlNGH ANDN.T.YADURAJU

14
claims
27
verbatim quotes
12
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted during the winter season of 2000-2001 and 2001-2002 at Jabalpur, to study the influence of tillage and herbicides on weed dynamics and yield of wheat (Triticum aestivum L. emend. Fiori & Paol.) under rice (Oryza sativa L.)-wheat system in Vertisols. The zero-till planting reduced the infestation of Phalaris minor Retz. and Chenopodium album L. but increased the problem of wild oat (Avena sterillis ssp. ludoviciana). Grain yield of wheat was similar in all the tillage systems. Unchecked weed competition reduced the grain yield by 23.4% and 22.3% compared to metribuzin and isoproturon, respectively. Application of isoproturon 1.0 kglha at 25 days after sowing (DAS) and metribuzin 0.30 kglha at 35 DAS significantly reduced the population of t? minorand C. album during both the years and resulted in significantly higher grain yield than weedy check but it failed to control wild oat. The highest mean net returns (Rs 6,5711ha) were obtained from zero tillage and appli- cation of isoproturon 1.0 kglha. Seeds of t? minor and C. album were higher in deep tillage and A. ludoviciana and Medicago hispida in zero tillage and they were mostly distributed in upper 1 cm soil depth. Deep tillage retained higher soil moisture than zero tillage.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zero-till planting increased the problem of wild oat (Avena sterillis ssp. ludoviciana) in wheat.

Treatment
zero-till plantinge1
Interactor
Avena sterillis ssp. ludovicianae1weed
Outcome
problem of wild oate1
Direction
increasede1
Setting
Jabalpure0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A field experiment was conducted during the winter season of 2000-2001 and 2001-2002 at Jabalpur, to study the influence of tillage and herbicides on weed dynamics and yield of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–182 · show in text ↑
e1

“The zero-till planting reduced the infestation of Phalaris minor Retz. and Chenopodium album L. but increased the problem of wild oat (Avena sterillis ssp. ludoviciana)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 283–451 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain yield of wheat was similar across the tillage systems.

Treatment
tillage systemse2
Outcome
Grain yielde2
Direction
similare2
Setting
Jabalpure0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A field experiment was conducted during the winter season of 2000-2001 and 2001-2002 at Jabalpur, to study the influence of tillage and herbicides on weed dynamics and yield of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–182 · show in text ↑
e2

“Grain yield of wheat was similar in all the tillage systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 453–512 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Unchecked weed competition reduced wheat grain yield by 23.4% compared with metribuzin.

Treatment
Unchecked weed competitione3
Outcome
grain yielde3
Direction
reducede3
Value
23.4%e3
Comparator
metribuzine3
Setting
Jabalpure0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A field experiment was conducted during the winter season of 2000-2001 and 2001-2002 at Jabalpur, to study the influence of tillage and herbicides on weed dynamics and yield of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–182 · show in text ↑
e3

“Unchecked weed competition reduced the grain yield by 23.4% and 22.3% compared to metribuzin and isoproturon, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 514–636 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Unchecked weed competition reduced wheat grain yield by 22.3% compared with isoproturon.

Treatment
Unchecked weed competitione3
Outcome
grain yielde3
Direction
reducede3
Value
22.3%e3
Comparator
isoproturone3
Setting
Jabalpure0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A field experiment was conducted during the winter season of 2000-2001 and 2001-2002 at Jabalpur, to study the influence of tillage and herbicides on weed dynamics and yield of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–182 · show in text ↑
e3

“Unchecked weed competition reduced the grain yield by 23.4% and 22.3% compared to metribuzin and isoproturon, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 514–636 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Isoproturon 1.0 kg/ha applied at 25 DAS significantly reduced the population of Chenopodium album in wheat.

Treatment
isoproturon 1.0 kglha at 25 days after sowing (DAS)e4
Interactor
C. albumChenopodium albume4weed
Outcome
populatione4
Direction
reducede4
Setting
Jabalpure0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Chenopodium album
Chenopodium album · InteractorOlivier Pichard · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A field experiment was conducted during the winter season of 2000-2001 and 2001-2002 at Jabalpur, to study the influence of tillage and herbicides on weed dynamics and yield of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–182 · show in text ↑
e4

“Application of isoproturon 1.0 kglha at 25 days after sowing (DAS) and metribuzin 0.30 kglha at 35 DAS significantly reduced the population of t? minorand C. album during both the years and resulted in significantly higher grain yield than weedy check but it failed to control wild oat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 638–923 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Metribuzin 0.30 kg/ha applied at 35 DAS significantly reduced the population of Chenopodium album in wheat.

Treatment
metribuzin 0.30 kglha at 35 DASe4
Interactor
C. albumChenopodium albume4weed
Outcome
populatione4
Direction
reducede4
Setting
Jabalpure0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Chenopodium album
Chenopodium album · InteractorOlivier Pichard · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A field experiment was conducted during the winter season of 2000-2001 and 2001-2002 at Jabalpur, to study the influence of tillage and herbicides on weed dynamics and yield of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–182 · show in text ↑
e4

“Application of isoproturon 1.0 kglha at 25 days after sowing (DAS) and metribuzin 0.30 kglha at 35 DAS significantly reduced the population of t? minorand C. album during both the years and resulted in significantly higher grain yield than weedy check but it failed to control wild oat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 638–923 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Isoproturon 1.0 kg/ha applied at 25 DAS resulted in significantly higher wheat grain yield than the weedy check.

Treatment
isoproturon 1.0 kglha at 25 days after sowing (DAS)e4
Outcome
grain yielde4
Direction
highere4
Comparator
weedy checke4
Setting
Jabalpure0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A field experiment was conducted during the winter season of 2000-2001 and 2001-2002 at Jabalpur, to study the influence of tillage and herbicides on weed dynamics and yield of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–182 · show in text ↑
e4

“Application of isoproturon 1.0 kglha at 25 days after sowing (DAS) and metribuzin 0.30 kglha at 35 DAS significantly reduced the population of t? minorand C. album during both the years and resulted in significantly higher grain yield than weedy check but it failed to control wild oat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 638–923 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Metribuzin 0.30 kg/ha applied at 35 DAS resulted in significantly higher wheat grain yield than the weedy check.

Treatment
metribuzin 0.30 kglha at 35 DASe4
Outcome
grain yielde4
Direction
highere4
Comparator
weedy checke4
Setting
Jabalpure0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A field experiment was conducted during the winter season of 2000-2001 and 2001-2002 at Jabalpur, to study the influence of tillage and herbicides on weed dynamics and yield of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–182 · show in text ↑
e4

“Application of isoproturon 1.0 kglha at 25 days after sowing (DAS) and metribuzin 0.30 kglha at 35 DAS significantly reduced the population of t? minorand C. album during both the years and resulted in significantly higher grain yield than weedy check but it failed to control wild oat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 638–923 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Herbicides failed to control wild oat in wheat.

Treatment
herbicidese0
Interactor
wild oate4weed
Outcome
wild oate4
Direction
failed to controle4
Setting
Jabalpure0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A field experiment was conducted during the winter season of 2000-2001 and 2001-2002 at Jabalpur, to study the influence of tillage and herbicides on weed dynamics and yield of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–182 · show in text ↑
e4

“Application of isoproturon 1.0 kglha at 25 days after sowing (DAS) and metribuzin 0.30 kglha at 35 DAS significantly reduced the population of t? minorand C. album during both the years and resulted in significantly higher grain yield than weedy check but it failed to control wild oat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 638–923 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zero tillage with isoproturon gave the highest mean net returns in wheat.

Treatment
zero tillagee5
Outcome
mean net returnse5
Direction
higheste5
Value
Rs 6,5711hae5
Setting
Jabalpure0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A field experiment was conducted during the winter season of 2000-2001 and 2001-2002 at Jabalpur, to study the influence of tillage and herbicides on weed dynamics and yield of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–182 · show in text ↑
e5

“The highest mean net returns (Rs 6,5711ha) were obtained from zero tillage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 925–999 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seeds of Chenopodium album were higher under deep tillage than under other tillage in the wheat system.

Treatment
deep tillagee6
Interactor
C. albumChenopodium albume6weed
Outcome
Seedse6
Direction
highere6
Setting
Jabalpure0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Chenopodium album
Chenopodium album · InteractorOlivier Pichard · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A field experiment was conducted during the winter season of 2000-2001 and 2001-2002 at Jabalpur, to study the influence of tillage and herbicides on weed dynamics and yield of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–182 · show in text ↑
e6

“Seeds of t? minor and C. album were higher in deep tillage and A. ludoviciana and Medicago hispida in zero tillage and they were mostly distributed in upper 1 cm soil depth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1044–1216 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seeds of Medicago hispida and Avena ludoviciana were higher under zero tillage than under other tillage in the wheat system.

Treatment
zero tillagee6
Interactor
Medicago hispidae6weed
Second interactor
A. ludovicianaAvena sterilis subsp. ludovicianae6weed
Outcome
Seedse6
Direction
highere6
Setting
Jabalpure0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Avena sterilis subsp. ludoviciana
Avena sterilis subsp. ludoviciana · Second interactorMarie PORTAS · CC BY-SA 2.0 fr · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A field experiment was conducted during the winter season of 2000-2001 and 2001-2002 at Jabalpur, to study the influence of tillage and herbicides on weed dynamics and yield of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–182 · show in text ↑
e6

“Seeds of t? minor and C. album were higher in deep tillage and A. ludoviciana and Medicago hispida in zero tillage and they were mostly distributed in upper 1 cm soil depth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1044–1216 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed seeds in the wheat system were mostly distributed in the upper 1 cm of soil.

Outcome
distributede6
Qualifier
upper 1 cm soil depthe6
Setting
Jabalpure0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A field experiment was conducted during the winter season of 2000-2001 and 2001-2002 at Jabalpur, to study the influence of tillage and herbicides on weed dynamics and yield of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–182 · show in text ↑
e6

“Seeds of t? minor and C. album were higher in deep tillage and A. ludoviciana and Medicago hispida in zero tillage and they were mostly distributed in upper 1 cm soil depth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1044–1216 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Deep tillage retained higher soil moisture than zero tillage.

Treatment
Deep tillagee7
Outcome
soil moisturee7
Direction
highere7
Comparator
zero tillagee7

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e7

“Deep tillage retained higher soil moisture than zero tillage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1218–1278 · show in text ↑

metribuzin · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

75 papers: 45 positive, 30 negative or no effect

44 papers in the same direction as this paper · 27 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

71 papers more in this group

See all 75 papers →

isoproturon · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

89 papers: 75 positive, 14 negative or no effect

74 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

85 papers more in this group

See all 89 papers →

isoproturon · Chenopodium album · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

metribuzin · Chenopodium album · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

competition · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

35 papers: 3 positive, 32 negative or no effect

31 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

31 papers more in this group

See all 35 papers →

tillage · Chenopodium album · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 6 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

tillage · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

1,414 papers: 1,116 positive, 298 negative or no effect

1,115 papers in the same direction as this paper · 257 in the opposite direction · 41 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

1,410 papers more in this group

See all 1,414 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.