Paper · 2002 · Indian Journal of Weed Science

Effect of clodinafop-propargyl on weeds and wheat yield

Govindra Singh; Mahendra Singh; V. P. Singh

6
claims
11
verbatim quotes
5
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Field experiment was conducted during winter seasons of 1996–97 and 1997–98 tel assess the effect of clodinafop-propargyl on weeds and wheat yield. Results revealed that Phalaris minor was controlled effectively due to application of clodinafop-propargyl at 50 and 60 g ha−1. Tank mixture of clodinafop-propargyl and isoproturon caused reduction in the density of Chenopodium album and Melilotus alba, but mixing of isoproturon with clodinafoppropargyl at 500 g ha−1 was less effective than at 750 g ha−1. Clodinafop-propargyl at 50 and 60 g ha−1 yielded more than at 40 g ha−1. Grain yield of wheat was increased significantly when clodinafop-propargyl was tank mixed with isoproturon at 750 g ha−1.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Clodinafop at 50 and 60 g ha−1 controlled Phalaris minor.

Treatment
clodinafop-propargyl at 50 and 60 g ha−1e0
Interactor
Phalaris minorPhalaris minore0weed
Outcome
Phalaris minor was controlled effectivelye0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Phalaris minor
Phalaris minor · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMatt Lavin from Bozeman, Montana, USA · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Phalaris minor was controlled effectively due to application of clodinafop-propargyl at 50 and 60 g ha−1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 170–274 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–49 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tank mixing reduced Chenopodium album density.

Treatment
Tank mixture of clodinafop-propargyl and isoproturone0
Interactor
Chenopodium albumChenopodium albume0weed
Outcome
density of Chenopodium albume0
Direction
reductione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Chenopodium album
Chenopodium album · InteractorOlivier Pichard · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Tank mixture of clodinafop-propargyl and isoproturon caused reduction in the density of Chenopodium album and Melilotus alba”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 276–400 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–49 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tank mixing reduced Melilotus alba density.

Treatment
Tank mixture of clodinafop-propargyl and isoproturone0
Interactor
Melilotus albaMelilotus albuse0weed
Outcome
Melilotus albae0
Direction
reductione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Melilotus albus
Melilotus albus · InteractorNo machine-readable author provided. Bogdan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Tank mixture of clodinafop-propargyl and isoproturon caused reduction in the density of Chenopodium album and Melilotus alba”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 276–400 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–49 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 500 g ha−1 isoproturon mixture was less effective than 750 g ha−1.

Treatment
isoproturon with clodinafoppropargyl at 500 g ha−1e0
Outcome
less effectivee0
Direction
less effectivee0
Comparator
at 750 g ha−1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“mixing of isoproturon with clodinafoppropargyl at 500 g ha−1 was less effective than at 750 g ha−1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 406–504 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–49 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Clodinafop at 50 and 60 g ha−1 yielded more than 40 g ha−1.

Treatment
Clodinafop-propargyl at 50 and 60 g ha−1e0
Outcome
yieldede0
Direction
moree0
Comparator
at 40 g ha−1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Clodinafop-propargyl at 50 and 60 g ha−1 yielded more than at 40 g ha−1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 506–577 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–49 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Clodinafop mixed with 750 g ha−1 isoproturon significantly increased wheat grain yield.

Treatment
clodinafop-propargyl was tank mixed with isoproturon at 750 g ha−1e0
Outcome
Grain yielde0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grain yield of wheat was increased significantly when clodinafop-propargyl was tank mixed with isoproturon at 750 g ha−1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 579–699 · show in text ↑

clodinafop-propargyl · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

45 papers: 41 positive, 4 negative or no effect

40 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

41 papers more in this group

See all 45 papers →

isoproturon · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

89 papers: 75 positive, 14 negative or no effect

74 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

85 papers more in this group

See all 89 papers →

isoproturon · Chenopodium album · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

clodinafop-propargyl · Phalaris minor · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.