Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Clodinafop mixed with 750 g ha−1 isoproturon significantly increased wheat grain yield.

A claim from Effect of clodinafop-propargyl on weeds and wheat yield · 2002

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Clodinafop mixed with 750 g ha−1 isoproturon significantly increased wheat grain yield.

Treatment
clodinafop-propargyl was tank mixed with isoproturon at 750 g ha−1e0
Outcome
Grain yielde0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grain yield of wheat was increased significantly when clodinafop-propargyl was tank mixed with isoproturon at 750 g ha−1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 579–699

Title

Effect of clodinafop-propargyl on weeds and wheat yield

Govindra Singh; Mahendra Singh; V. P. Singh Indian Journal of Weed Science 2002

Other claims from this paper (5)

Record rev-e5b6348f063c2bfc4c0fef88731113259fc4895fac00b35520f6a9795fbbc8c4 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 6 in the model’s answer

clodinafop-propargyl · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

45 papers: 41 positive, 4 negative or no effect

40 papers in the same direction as this claim · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

36 papers more in this group

See all 45 papers →

isoproturon · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

89 papers: 75 positive, 14 negative or no effect

74 papers in the same direction as this claim · 7 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. no effect

80 papers more in this group

See all 89 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.