Paper · 2003 · Indian Journal of Weed Science

Influence of Paddy Residue Management Techniques on the Bioefficacy of Herbicides for Control of Phalaris minor in Rice-Wheat System

L. S. Brar; U. S. Walia; B. S. Gill; et al.

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
4
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Field experiments were conducted during 1998–99 and 1999–2000 on sandy loam soils to study the bioefficacy of isoproturon, tralkoxydim, clodinafop, fenoxaprop-p-ethyl and sulfosulfuron for the control of Phalaris minor in wheat with respect to different paddy residue management techniques (straw removal, complete burning, partial burning and incorporation). The differences in wheat grain yield were non-significant with different paddy residue management systems during 1998–99, however, during 1999–2000, significantly highest grain yield was recorded with full rice straw incorporation 8.0 t ha−1) than partial burning and rest incorporation of the straw. On an average of two years, whole incorporation of rice straw increased grain yield by 2.3% over straw removal treatment. Application of isoproturon even at double the recommended dose did not control P. minor effectively and gave significantly lower grain yield as compared to tralkoxydim (0.35 kg ha-1), clodinafop (0.06 kg ha−1), fenoxaprop-p-ethyl (0.10 kg ha−1) and sulfosulfuron (0.025 kg ha−1) under all the residue management systems. Poor control of P. minor with isoproturon even at double the recommended rate may be due to the development of resistance in P. minor to this herbicide.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Whole incorporation of rice straw increased wheat grain yield by 2.3% over straw removal, averaged over two years.

Treatment
whole incorporation of rice strawe1
Outcome
grain yielde1
Direction
increasede1
Value
2.3%e1
Qualifier
On an average of two yearse1
Comparator
straw removale1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“for the control of Phalaris minor in wheat with respect to different paddy residue management techniques”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 185–289 · show in text ↑
e1

“On an average of two years, whole incorporation of rice straw increased grain yield by 2.3% over straw removal treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 661–781 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Paddy residue management systems did not significantly change wheat grain yield during 1998-99.

Treatment
different paddy residue management systemse2
Outcome
wheat grain yielde2
Direction
non-significante2
Qualifier
during 1998–99e2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“for the control of Phalaris minor in wheat with respect to different paddy residue management techniques”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 185–289 · show in text ↑
e2

“The differences in wheat grain yield were non-significant with different paddy residue management systems during 1998–99”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 360–480 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Full rice straw incorporation at 8.0 t/ha gave significantly the highest wheat grain yield in 1999-2000.

Treatment
full rice straw incorporation 8.0 t ha−1e3
Outcome
grain yielde3
Direction
higheste3
Comparator
partial burning and rest incorporatione3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“for the control of Phalaris minor in wheat with respect to different paddy residue management techniques”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 185–289 · show in text ↑
e3

“significantly highest grain yield was recorded with full rice straw incorporation 8.0 t ha−1) than partial burning and rest incorporation of the straw”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 509–659 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Isoproturon even at double the recommended dose did not control Phalaris minor effectively.

Treatment
isoproturon even at double the recommended dosee4
Interactor
Phalaris minorPhalaris minore0weed
Outcome
control P. minore4
Direction
did note4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Phalaris minor
Phalaris minor · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMatt Lavin from Bozeman, Montana, USA · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“for the control of Phalaris minor in wheat with respect to different paddy residue management techniques”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 185–289 · show in text ↑
e4

“Application of isoproturon even at double the recommended dose did not control P. minor effectively and gave significantly lower grain yield as compared to tralkoxydim (0.35 kg ha-1), clodinafop (0.06 kg ha−1), fenoxaprop-p-ethyl (0.10 kg ha−1) and sulfosulfuron (0.025 kg ha−1) under all the residue management systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 783–1102 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Isoproturon gave significantly lower wheat grain yield than tralkoxydim, clodinafop, fenoxaprop-p-ethyl and sulfosulfuron under all residue management systems.

Treatment
isoproturon even at double the recommended dosee4
Outcome
grain yielde4
Direction
significantly lowere4
Comparator
tralkoxydim (0.35 kg ha-1), clodinafop (0.06 kg ha−1), fenoxaprop-p-ethyl (0.10 kg ha−1) and sulfosulfuron (0.025 kg ha−1)e4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“for the control of Phalaris minor in wheat with respect to different paddy residue management techniques”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 185–289 · show in text ↑
e4

“Application of isoproturon even at double the recommended dose did not control P. minor effectively and gave significantly lower grain yield as compared to tralkoxydim (0.35 kg ha-1), clodinafop (0.06 kg ha−1), fenoxaprop-p-ethyl (0.10 kg ha−1) and sulfosulfuron (0.025 kg ha−1) under all the residue management systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 783–1102 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Poor control of Phalaris minor by isoproturon may be due to resistance development in the weed to this herbicide.

Treatment
isoproturone5
Outcome
Poor control of P. minore5
Qualifier
development of resistance in P. minor to this herbicidee5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“for the control of Phalaris minor in wheat with respect to different paddy residue management techniques”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 185–289 · show in text ↑
e5

“Poor control of P. minor with isoproturon even at double the recommended rate may be due to the development of resistance in P. minor to this herbicide”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1104–1255 · show in text ↑

isoproturon · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

89 papers: 75 positive, 14 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 75 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

85 papers more in this group

See all 89 papers →

isoproturon · Phalaris minor · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

24 papers: 18 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 18 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

20 papers more in this group

See all 24 papers →

Oryza sativa · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

154 papers: 128 positive, 26 negative or no effect

127 papers in the same direction as this paper · 23 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

150 papers more in this group

See all 154 papers →

cultivation system · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

116 papers: 71 positive, 45 negative or no effect

44 papers in the same direction as this paper · 71 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

112 papers more in this group

See all 116 papers →

organic · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

322 papers: 281 positive, 41 negative or no effect

280 papers in the same direction as this paper · 35 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

318 papers more in this group

See all 322 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.