Paper · 2020 · Planta Daninha

Effect of Isoproturon With and Without Adjuvants on Photosynthetic Attributes of Wheat and Its Associated Weeds

M.M. JAVAID; A.U.H. ZIA; H. WAHEED; et al.

6
claims
18
verbatim quotes
14
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

ABSTRACT: Among various weed management strategies, chemical weed control is considered the most effective method. However, optimum dose and suitable combination of herbicide with adjuvants play a vital role in controlling weeds at an acceptable level and produce maximum crop yield. A field study was conducted to investigate the effect of post-emergence herbicide isoproturon alone or with combination of adjuvants on winter wheat and its associated weeds. The treatments were isoproturon at 175 g a.i. ha-1, 140 g a.i. ha-1 and 105 g a.i. ha-1 applied alone or with adjuvants Ad-500 or Bio-enhancer at 400 mL ha-1 each and weedy check as a control treatment. Isoproturon at 175 g a.i. ha-1 + Bio-enhancer at 400 mL ha-1 was most effective treatment for control of Melilotus indica, Anagallis arvensis, Phalaris minor and Fumaria indica as it decreased the photosynthetic activity, fresh and dry biomass of these weeds. In case of wheat, highest productive tillers, plant height, 1000-grain weight, biological and grain yield were achieved with isoproturon at 175 g a.i. ha-1 + Bio-enhancer at 400 mL ha-1. However, highest values of gas exchange parameters of wheat were observed where no herbicide was sprayed. It can be concluded that isoproturon at 175 g a.i. ha-1 + Bio-enhancer at 400 mL ha-1 might be a profitable approach to achieve optimal yield of wheat by causing the maximum suppression of these tested weeds. Moreover, the herbicide at reduced dose with adjuvants was not much effective in terms of weed control or increased yield.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Isoproturon at 175 g a.i. ha-1 with Bio-enhancer at 400 mL ha-1 decreased photosynthetic activity, fresh and dry biomass of the tested weeds compared with the weedy check.

Treatment
Isoproturon at 175 g a.i. ha-1 + Bio-enhancer at 400 mL ha-1e1
Interactor
Melilotus indica, Anagallis arvensis, Phalaris minor and Fumaria indicaLysimachia arvensisMelilotus indicusPhalaris minorFumaria indicae1weed
Outcome
photosynthetic activity, fresh and dry biomasse1
Direction
decreasede1
Comparator
weedy checke2
Setting
fielde4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Lysimachia arvensis
Lysimachia arvensis · InteractorAlvesgaspar · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Melilotus indicus
Melilotus indicus · InteractorZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Phalaris minor
Phalaris minor · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMatt Lavin from Bozeman, Montana, USA · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Isoproturon at 175 g a.i. ha-1 + Bio-enhancer at 400 mL ha-1 was most effective treatment for control of Melilotus indica, Anagallis arvensis, Phalaris minor and Fumaria indica as it decreased the photosynthetic activity, fresh and dry biomass of these weeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 662–920 · show in text ↑
e2

“and weedy check as a control treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 622–660 · show in text ↑
e3

“on winter wheat and its associated weeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 417–457 · show in text ↑
e4

“A field study was conducted”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 284–311 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Isoproturon at 175 g a.i. ha-1 with Bio-enhancer at 400 mL ha-1 gave the highest productive tillers, plant height and 1000-grain weight of wheat.

Treatment
isoproturon at 175 g a.i. ha-1 + Bio-enhancer at 400 mL ha-1e2
Outcome
productive tillers, plant height, 1000-grain weighte1
Direction
higheste1
Setting
fielde4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“highest productive tillers, plant height, 1000-grain weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 940–999 · show in text ↑
e2

“biological and grain yield were achieved with isoproturon at 175 g a.i. ha-1 + Bio-enhancer at 400 mL ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1001–1107 · show in text ↑
e3

“on winter wheat and its associated weeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 417–457 · show in text ↑
e4

“A field study was conducted”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 284–311 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Isoproturon at 175 g a.i. ha-1 with Bio-enhancer at 400 mL ha-1 gave the highest biological and grain yield of wheat.

Treatment
isoproturon at 175 g a.i. ha-1 + Bio-enhancer at 400 mL ha-1e2
Outcome
biological and grain yielde2
Direction
higheste1
Setting
fielde4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“highest productive tillers, plant height, 1000-grain weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 940–999 · show in text ↑
e2

“biological and grain yield were achieved with isoproturon at 175 g a.i. ha-1 + Bio-enhancer at 400 mL ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1001–1107 · show in text ↑
e3

“on winter wheat and its associated weeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 417–457 · show in text ↑
e4

“A field study was conducted”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 284–311 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat gas exchange parameters were highest where no herbicide was sprayed.

Treatment
no herbicide was sprayede1
Outcome
gas exchange parameterse1
Direction
higheste1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“highest values of gas exchange parameters of wheat were observed where no herbicide was sprayed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1118–1213 · show in text ↑
e2

“on winter wheat and its associated weeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 417–457 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Isoproturon at 175 g a.i. ha-1 with Bio-enhancer at 400 mL ha-1 might be a profitable approach to achieve optimal wheat yield.

Treatment
isoproturon at 175 g a.i. ha-1 + Bio-enhancer at 400 mL ha-1e1
Outcome
profitable approach to achieve optimal yield of wheate1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“It can be concluded that isoproturon at 175 g a.i. ha-1 + Bio-enhancer at 400 mL ha-1 might be a profitable approach to achieve optimal yield of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1215–1365 · show in text ↑
e2

“on winter wheat and its associated weeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 417–457 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The herbicide at reduced dose with adjuvants was not much effective for weed control or increased yield.

Treatment
the herbicide at reduced dose with adjuvantse1
Outcome
weed control or increased yielde1
Direction
not much effectivee1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“the herbicide at reduced dose with adjuvants was not much effective in terms of weed control or increased yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1434–1545 · show in text ↑
e2

“on winter wheat and its associated weeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 417–457 · show in text ↑

isoproturon · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

89 papers: 75 positive, 14 negative or no effect

74 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

85 papers more in this group

See all 89 papers →

adjuvant · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 5 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

isoproturon · Phalaris minor · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

24 papers: 18 positive, 6 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

20 papers more in this group

See all 24 papers →

application · physiology: gas exchange · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

23 papers: 21 positive, 2 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

19 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

herbicide · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

401 papers: 362 positive, 39 negative or no effect

38 papers in the same direction as this paper · 362 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

397 papers more in this group

See all 401 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.