Paper · 1988 · Canadian Journal of Plant Science

THE EFFECTS OF GLAUCOUSNESS, EPICUTICULAR WAX, LEAF AGE, PLANT HEIGHT, AND GROWTH ENVIRONMENT ON WATER LOSS RATES OF EXCISED WHEAT LEAVES

J. M. CLARKE; R. A. RICHARDS

7
claims
16
verbatim quotes
65
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Water loss at minimum stomatal aperture (residual transpiration) from plant surfaces accounts for a substantial proportion of total transpiration during periods of water stress and at night. Its reduction by genetic selection has been suggested as a desirable objective in water-limited environments. To identify genetic and environmental sources of variation in residual transpiration of wheat (Triticum spp.), the effects of glaucousness, epicuticular wax, leaf age, plant height, and growth environment were determined using excised leaves. Glaucousness reduced residual transpiration by an average of 10%. Differing quantities of epicuticular wax and glaucousness in an isogenic pair of genotypes affected residual transpiration as well, the rate being 33% greater in the low wax, nonglaucous than in the high wax, glaucous line. Residual transpiration rate of flag leaves of field-grown plants increased with leaf age, particularly during the 7 d following ligule appearance. The rate of residual transpiration was greater in tall than in dwarf near-isogenic lines. Residual transpiration of leaves from plants grown in glasshouses was 44–66% lower than that of plants grown outdoors, which had a mean rate of 2.68 × 10 −5 g H 2 O cm −2 min −1 . Method of water application to glasshouse plants influenced residual transpiration rate. The rate for leaves of plants watered by spraying water onto the plant and soil surface was 20% greater than that of leaves of plants watered on the soil surface only. It was concluded that the increase in residual transpiration rate with leaf age was due to duration of exposure to the rigors of the exterior environment; the absence of this in controlled environments results in lower rates of residual transpiration than in the field.Key words: Cuticular transpiration, Triticum aestivum L., Triticum turgidum L. var. durum, wheat

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glaucousness reduced residual transpiration of wheat leaves by an average of 10%.

Treatment
Glaucousnesse1
Outcome
residual transpiratione1
Direction
reducede1
Value
10%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“To identify genetic and environmental sources of variation in residual transpiration of wheat (Triticum spp.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 301–410 · show in text ↑
e1

“Glaucousness reduced residual transpiration by an average of 10%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 544–608 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The low-wax nonglaucous wheat line had a residual transpiration rate 33% greater than the high-wax glaucous line.

Material
isogenic pair of genotypese3
Treatment
Differing quantities of epicuticular wax and glaucousnesse3
Outcome
residual transpiratione3
Direction
greatere2
Value
33%e2
Comparator
high wax, glaucous linee2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“To identify genetic and environmental sources of variation in residual transpiration of wheat (Triticum spp.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 301–410 · show in text ↑
e2

“the rate being 33% greater in the low wax, nonglaucous than in the high wax, glaucous line”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 742–832 · show in text ↑
e3

“Differing quantities of epicuticular wax and glaucousness in an isogenic pair of genotypes affected residual transpiration as well”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 610–740 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Residual transpiration of flag leaves of field-grown wheat increased with leaf age, particularly during the 7 days after ligule appearance.

Organ / stage
flag leavese4
Treatment
leaf agee4
Outcome
Residual transpiration ratee4
Direction
increasede4
Qualifier
particularly during the 7 d following ligule appearancee4
Setting
field-grown plantse4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“To identify genetic and environmental sources of variation in residual transpiration of wheat (Triticum spp.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 301–410 · show in text ↑
e4

“Residual transpiration rate of flag leaves of field-grown plants increased with leaf age, particularly during the 7 d following ligule appearance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 834–979 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Residual transpiration rate was greater in tall than in dwarf near-isogenic wheat lines.

Material
near-isogenic linese5
Outcome
rate of residual transpiratione5
Direction
greatere5
Comparator
dwarf near-isogenic linese5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“To identify genetic and environmental sources of variation in residual transpiration of wheat (Triticum spp.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 301–410 · show in text ↑
e5

“The rate of residual transpiration was greater in tall than in dwarf near-isogenic lines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 981–1069 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Residual transpiration of wheat leaves from glasshouse-grown plants was 44–66% lower than from outdoor-grown plants.

Treatment
plants grown in glasshousese6
Outcome
Residual transpiration of leavese6
Direction
lowere6
Value
44–66%e6
Comparator
plants grown outdoorse6
Setting
glasshousese6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“To identify genetic and environmental sources of variation in residual transpiration of wheat (Triticum spp.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 301–410 · show in text ↑
e6

“Residual transpiration of leaves from plants grown in glasshouses was 44–66% lower than that of plants grown outdoors”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1071–1188 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spraying water onto the plant and soil surface gave 20% greater residual transpiration than watering the soil surface only.

Treatment
watered by spraying water onto the plant and soil surfacee7
Outcome
residual transpiration ratee1
Direction
greatere7
Value
20%e7
Comparator
watered on the soil surface onlye7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“To identify genetic and environmental sources of variation in residual transpiration of wheat (Triticum spp.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 301–410 · show in text ↑
e7

“The rate for leaves of plants watered by spraying water onto the plant and soil surface was 20% greater than that of leaves of plants watered on the soil surface only”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1340–1506 · show in text ↑
e1

“Method of water application to glasshouse plants influenced residual transpiration rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1251–1338 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The increase of residual transpiration with leaf age is attributed to longer exposure of leaves to the external environment.

Outcome
residual transpiration rate with leaf agee1
Qualifier
duration of exposure to the rigors of the exterior environmente1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“To identify genetic and environmental sources of variation in residual transpiration of wheat (Triticum spp.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 301–410 · show in text ↑
e1

“the increase in residual transpiration rate with leaf age was due to duration of exposure to the rigors of the exterior environment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1530–1661 · show in text ↑

application · physiology: gas exchange · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

23 papers: 21 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 21 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

19 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.