Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Older leaves closed stomata less fully than young leaves after ABA sprays.

A claim from Ethylene limits abscisic acid‐ or soil drying‐induced stomatal closure in aged wheat leaves · 2013

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Older leaves closed stomata less fully than young leaves after ABA sprays.

Organ / stage
Older, fully expanded leavese0
Treatment
foliar ABA sprayse0
Outcome
ability to close stomatae0
Direction
partly loste0
Comparator
young fully expanded leavese0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Older, fully expanded leaves partly lost their ability to close stomata in response to foliar ABA sprays, and soil drying which stimulated endogenous ABA production, while young fully expanded leaves closed their stomata more fully”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 123–354
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–84

Title

Ethylene limits abscisic acid‐ or soil drying‐induced stomatal closure in aged wheat leaves

LIN CHEN; IAN C. DODD; WILLIAM J. DAVIES; et al. Plant Cell & Environment 2013. doi:10.1111/pce.12094

Other claims from this paper (7)

Record rev-d222eae09fbd3586a5c44642962ebafd039a4b1da0782183f1c9cfe75ff97592 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

(+)-abscisic acid · physiology: gas exchange · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

12 papers: 7 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this claim · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. negative

3 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

application · physiology: gas exchange · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

23 papers: 21 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim · 21 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

14 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.