Paper · 1985 · Tropical Pest Management

Cultural and chemical manipulations for weed management in wheat with reference to grassy weeds

K. K. Sharma; S. P. Verma; C. M. Singh

7
claims
13
verbatim quotes
7
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Field investigations on a moderately fertile silty clay loam soil in the northwestern Himalayas revealed that the weed flora in wheat crops in this zone comprised mainly of three grassy weeds: Phalaris minor Retz., Avena fatua L. and Lolium temu‐lentum L. Cultural manipulations such as closer spaced rows, i.e. 15 cm spacing between rows, and/or cross row sowing in combination with the application of isoproturon at 0.50 kg a.i./ha applied 2 weeks after sowing significantly reduced the density of Phalaris minor and Avena fatua weeds. The dry weight of these grassy weed species was significantly lowered with the application of isoproturon irrespective of its rate and time of application. Isoproturon application at a rate of 1 kg a.i./ha or 0.50 kg a.i./ha in combination with cross row sowing, normal row spacing of 22.5 cm or closer spaced rows of 15 cm reduced the weed competition and resulted in positive advantages in yield attributes and increased the grain yield of wheat.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Three grassy weeds predominated in wheat fields.

Interactor
Phalaris minor Retz.Phalaris minore0weed
Second interactor
Avena fatua L.Avena fatuae0weed
Outcome
weed florae0
Qualifier
Lolium temu‐lentum L.e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Phalaris minor
Phalaris minor · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMatt Lavin from Bozeman, Montana, USA · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Avena fatua
Avena fatua · Second interactorHelge Oskarsen · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“weed flora in wheat crops in this zone comprised mainly of three grassy weeds: Phalaris minor Retz., Avena fatua L. and Lolium temu‐lentum L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 123–264 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Closer rows and cross row sowing with isoproturon reduced Phalaris minor density.

Treatment
closer spaced rows, i.e. 15 cm spacing between rows, and/or cross row sowing in combination with the application of isoproturon at 0.50 kg a.i./hae0
Interactor
Phalaris minorPhalaris minore0weed
Outcome
density of Phalaris minore0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Phalaris minor
Phalaris minor · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMatt Lavin from Bozeman, Montana, USA · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“closer spaced rows, i.e. 15 cm spacing between rows, and/or cross row sowing in combination with the application of isoproturon at 0.50 kg a.i./ha applied 2 weeks after sowing significantly reduced the density of Phalaris minor and Avena fatua weeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 296–545 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–64 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Closer rows and cross row sowing with isoproturon reduced Avena fatua density.

Treatment
closer spaced rows, i.e. 15 cm spacing between rows, and/or cross row sowing in combination with the application of isoproturon at 0.50 kg a.i./hae0
Interactor
Avena fatuaAvena fatuae0weed
Outcome
density of Phalaris minor and Avena fatua weedse0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Avena fatua
Avena fatua · InteractorHelge Oskarsen · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“closer spaced rows, i.e. 15 cm spacing between rows, and/or cross row sowing in combination with the application of isoproturon at 0.50 kg a.i./ha applied 2 weeks after sowing significantly reduced the density of Phalaris minor and Avena fatua weeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 296–545 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–64 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Isoproturon reduced grassy weed dry weight regardless of rate or timing.

Treatment
application of isoproturone0
Outcome
dry weight of these grassy weed speciese0
Direction
lowerede0
Qualifier
irrespective of its rate and time of applicatione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The dry weight of these grassy weed species was significantly lowered with the application of isoproturon irrespective of its rate and time of application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 547–701 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–64 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Isoproturon treatments reduced weed competition.

Treatment
Isoproturon application at a rate of 1 kg a.i./ha or 0.50 kg a.i./hae0
Outcome
weed competitione0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Isoproturon application at a rate of 1 kg a.i./ha or 0.50 kg a.i./ha in combination with cross row sowing, normal row spacing of 22.5 cm or closer spaced rows of 15 cm reduced the weed competition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 703–899 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–64 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Isoproturon treatments improved wheat yield attributes.

Treatment
Isoproturon applicationt0
Outcome
yield attributese0
Direction
positive advantagese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“resulted in positive advantages in yield attributes and increased the grain yield of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 904–994 · show in text ↑
t0

“Isoproturon application at a rate of 1 kg a.i./ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 703–752 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Isoproturon treatments increased wheat grain yield.

Treatment
Isoproturon applicationt0
Outcome
grain yield of wheate0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“resulted in positive advantages in yield attributes and increased the grain yield of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 904–994 · show in text ↑
t0

“Isoproturon application at a rate of 1 kg a.i./ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 703–752 · show in text ↑

isoproturon · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

89 papers: 75 positive, 14 negative or no effect

74 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

85 papers more in this group

See all 89 papers →

isoproturon · Phalaris minor · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

24 papers: 18 positive, 6 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

20 papers more in this group

See all 24 papers →

isoproturon · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

74 papers: 72 positive, 2 negative or no effect

71 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

70 papers more in this group

See all 74 papers →

isoproturon · Avena fatua · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

density · Avena fatua · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

density · Phalaris minor · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.