Paper · 2024 · Agriculture Association of Textile Chemical and Critical Reviews

Evaluating the effect of herbicide combinations and sequential applications for broad-spectrum weed control in wheat

Harsh K. Patel; VJ Patel; DD Chaudhari

3
claims
6
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Wheat is India's second-largest staple food crop grown in different agro climatic zones in which weeds are known to pose a severe challenge to wheat production.Weed infestation is a major constraint reducing wheat productivity globally.A ield experiment was carried out during the rabi seasons of 2021-22 and 2022-23 on loamy sand soil at the AICRP-Weed Management farm, Anand Agricultural University, Anand (Gujarat).The study aimed to evaluate the effect of herbicide combination and sequential application for broad-spectrum weed control in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.).Twelve treatments were evaluated in a randomized block design with three replications.Results indicated that application of pendimethalin 30% EC 500 g a.i./haPE b clodinafop propargyl 15% WP 60 g a.i./haPoE,clodinafop propargyl 15% + metsulfuron methyl 1% WP (PM) 60 + 4 g a.i./haPoE, hand weeding at 20 and 40 DAS and sulfosulfuron 75% + metsulfuron methyl 5% WG (PM) 30 + 2 g a.i./haPoE provided signi icantly lower density and dry biomass of weeds, a higher number of effective tillers, test weight, lower weed index, higher gross return, and bene it-cost ratio as compared to other treatments.Further, application of metribuzin 42% + clodinafop propargyl 12% WG (PM) at both the rate i.e. 140 + 40 or 210 + 60 g a.i./haPoE provided effective control of weeds with higher weed control ef iciency but due to phytotoxic effect on the crop which leads to reduce the grain yield of wheat.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Four weed control treatments reduced weed density and biomass and improved tillers, test weight and returns versus alternatives.

Treatment
hand weeding at 20 and 40 DASe0
Outcome
density and dry biomass of weedse0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
other treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of pendimethalin 30% EC 500 g a.i./haPE b clodinafop propargyl 15% WP 60 g a.i./haPoE,clodinafop propargyl 15% + metsulfuron methyl 1% WP (PM) 60 + 4 g a.i./haPoE, hand weeding at 20 and 40 DAS and sulfosulfuron 75% + metsulfuron methyl 5% WG (PM) 30 + 2 g a.i./haPoE provided signi icantly lower density and dry biomass of weeds, a higher number of effective tillers, test weight, lower weed index, higher gross return, and bene it-cost ratio as compared to other treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 682–1169 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 111–116 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Metribuzin plus clodinafop controlled weeds with higher control efficiency at both rates.

Treatment
metribuzin 42% + clodinafop propargyl 12% WG (PM)e0
Outcome
weed control ef iciencye0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of metribuzin 42% + clodinafop propargyl 12% WG (PM) at both the rate i.e. 140 + 40 or 210 + 60 g a.i./haPoE provided effective control of weeds with higher weed control ef iciency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1179–1371 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 111–116 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Metribuzin plus clodinafop caused phytotoxicity and reduced wheat grain yield.

Treatment
metribuzin 42% + clodinafop propargyl 12% WG (PM)e1
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
reducee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“due to phytotoxic effect on the crop which leads to reduce the grain yield of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1376–1459 · show in text ↑
e1

“application of metribuzin 42% + clodinafop propargyl 12% WG (PM)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1179–1243 · show in text ↑

clodinafop-propargyl · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

45 papers: 41 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 41 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

41 papers more in this group

See all 45 papers →

metribuzin · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

75 papers: 45 positive, 30 negative or no effect

29 papers in the same direction as this paper · 45 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

71 papers more in this group

See all 75 papers →

clodinafop-propargyl · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

37 papers: 34 positive, 3 negative or no effect

33 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

33 papers more in this group

See all 37 papers →

metribuzin · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

63 papers: 60 positive, 3 negative or no effect

59 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

59 papers more in this group

See all 63 papers →

herbicide · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

401 papers: 362 positive, 39 negative or no effect

361 papers in the same direction as this paper · 34 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

397 papers more in this group

See all 401 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.