Paper · 2013 · Indian Journal of Weed Science

Ready-mix formulation of clodinafop-propargyl + metsulfuron-methyl against complex weed flora in wheat

R. S. Malik; Ashok Yadav; Ramesh Kumari

11
claims
14
verbatim quotes
15
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Bio-efficacy of ready-mix formulation of clodinafop-propargyl 15% + metsulfuron-methyl 1% WP was studied against complex weed flora in wheat during 2006–07 and 2007–08 at Hisar, India. Among different herbicidal treatments, clodinafop 0.06 kg/ha was found very effective (95–98%) only against grassy weeds. Metsulfuron 0.004 kg/ha was effective (88–90%) only against broad-leaf weeds. Sequential application of clodinafop 0.06 kg fb metsulfuron 0.004 kg/ha being statistically at par with clodinafoppropargyl + metsulfuron-methyl at 0.06 + 0.004 kg/ha and above proved very effective against complex weed flora and the control of grassy and broad-leaved weeds to the extent of 95%. clodinafop-propargyl + metsulfuron-methyl being at par with clodinafop fb metsulfuron 0.06 and 0.004 kg/ha recorded the number of spikes, 1000-grain weight and grain yield of wheat statistically similar to that of weed free check. There was no additional gain in grain yield of wheat by using higher doses of clodinafop-propargyl + metsulfuron-methyl beyond 0.06 + 0.004 kg/ha. Weeds allowed growing throughout the crop seasons resulted into 42.9 and 45.1% reduction in the grain yield of wheat during 2006–07 and 2007–08, respectively. There was no residual impact of clodinafop-propargyl + metsulfuron-methyl at x dose (0.06+ 0.004 kg/ha) and 2x dose (0.12 + 0.008 kg/ha) on succeeding crops of sorghum and moongbean. HPLC analysis indicated that there were no residues of clodinafop-propargyl + metsulfuron-methyl (x and 2x doses) at wheat harvest in soil, grains and straw. There was also no adverse effect of herbicides on physico-chemical properties of soil.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Clodinafop controlled grassy weeds by 95–98%.

Treatment
clodinafop 0.06 kg/hae0
Interactor
grassy weedse0weed
Outcome
grassy weedse0
Direction
very effectivee0
Value
95–98%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“clodinafop 0.06 kg/ha was found very effective (95–98%) only against grassy weeds.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 224–306 · show in text ↑
t0

“in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–102 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Metsulfuron controlled broad-leaf weeds by 88–90%.

Treatment
Metsulfuron 0.004 kg/hae0
Interactor
broad-leaf weedse0weed
Outcome
broad-leaf weedse0
Direction
effectivee0
Value
88–90%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Metsulfuron 0.004 kg/ha was effective (88–90%) only against broad-leaf weeds.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 307–384 · show in text ↑
t0

“in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–102 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sequential herbicide application controlled complex weeds by 95% and was statistically at par with the ready mix.

Treatment
Sequential application of clodinafop 0.06 kg fb metsulfuron 0.004 kg/hae0
Interactor
complex weed florae0weed
Outcome
control of grassy and broad-leaved weedse0
Direction
very effectivee0
Value
95%e0
Comparator
clodinafoppropargyl + metsulfuron-methyl at 0.06 + 0.004 kg/ha and abovee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sequential application of clodinafop 0.06 kg fb metsulfuron 0.004 kg/ha being statistically at par with clodinafoppropargyl + metsulfuron-methyl at 0.06 + 0.004 kg/ha and above proved very effective against complex weed flora and the control of grassy and broad-leaved weeds to the extent of 95%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 385–681 · show in text ↑
t0

“in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–102 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Ready mix produced spikes, grain weight and yield statistically similar to the weed-free check.

Treatment
clodinafop-propargyl + metsulfuron-methyle0
Outcome
number of spikes, 1000-grain weight and grain yielde0
Direction
statistically similare0
Comparator
weed free checke0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“clodinafop-propargyl + metsulfuron-methyl being at par with clodinafop fb metsulfuron 0.06 and 0.004 kg/ha recorded the number of spikes, 1000-grain weight and grain yield of wheat statistically similar to that of weed free check.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 682–912 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher ready mix doses gave no additional wheat grain yield.

Treatment
higher doses of clodinafop-propargyl + metsulfuron-methyle0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
no additional gaine0
Comparator
0.06 + 0.004 kg/hae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There was no additional gain in grain yield of wheat by using higher doses of clodinafop-propargyl + metsulfuron-methyl beyond 0.06 + 0.004 kg/ha.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 913–1059 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Uncontrolled weeds reduced wheat grain yield by 42.9% in 2006–07.

Treatment
Weeds allowed growing throughout the crop seasonse0
Interactor
Weedse0weed
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
reductione0
Value
42.9e0
Qualifier
2006–07e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Weeds allowed growing throughout the crop seasons resulted into 42.9 and 45.1% reduction in the grain yield of wheat during 2006–07 and 2007–08, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1060–1218 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Uncontrolled weeds reduced wheat grain yield by 45.1% in 2007–08.

Treatment
Weeds allowed growing throughout the crop seasonse0
Interactor
Weedse0weed
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
reductione0
Value
45.1%e0
Qualifier
2007–08e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Weeds allowed growing throughout the crop seasons resulted into 42.9 and 45.1% reduction in the grain yield of wheat during 2006–07 and 2007–08, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1060–1218 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ready mix at x and 2x doses had no residual impact on succeeding sorghum.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume0
Treatment
clodinafop-propargyl + metsulfuron-methyl at x dose (0.06+ 0.004 kg/ha) and 2x dose (0.12 + 0.008 kg/ha)e0
Outcome
residual impacte0
Direction
no residual impacte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There was no residual impact of clodinafop-propargyl + metsulfuron-methyl at x dose (0.06+ 0.004 kg/ha) and 2x dose (0.12 + 0.008 kg/ha) on succeeding crops of sorghum and moongbean.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1219–1401 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ready mix at x and 2x doses had no residual impact on succeeding moongbean.

Taxon
moongbeane0
Treatment
clodinafop-propargyl + metsulfuron-methyl at x dose (0.06+ 0.004 kg/ha) and 2x dose (0.12 + 0.008 kg/ha)e0
Outcome
residual impacte0
Direction
no residual impacte0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“There was no residual impact of clodinafop-propargyl + metsulfuron-methyl at x dose (0.06+ 0.004 kg/ha) and 2x dose (0.12 + 0.008 kg/ha) on succeeding crops of sorghum and moongbean.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1219–1401 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No ready mix residues were detected in soil, grains or straw at harvest.

Organ / stage
grains and strawe0
Outcome
no residues of clodinafop-propargyl + metsulfuron-methyle0
Direction
no residuese0
Setting
soile0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“HPLC analysis indicated that there were no residues of clodinafop-propargyl + metsulfuron-methyl (x and 2x doses) at wheat harvest in soil, grains and straw.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1402–1559 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Herbicides had no adverse effect on soil physicochemical properties.

Outcome
physico-chemical properties of soile0
Direction
no adverse effecte0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“There was also no adverse effect of herbicides on physico-chemical properties of soil.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1560–1646 · show in text ↑

schema checkedfield values found in the cited quotesPermalinkReport an issue

clodinafop-propargyl · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

45 papers: 41 positive, 4 negative or no effect

40 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

41 papers more in this group

See all 45 papers →

clodinafop · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

61 papers: 54 positive, 7 negative or no effect

53 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

57 papers more in this group

See all 61 papers →

metsulfuron methyl · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

134 papers: 132 positive, 2 negative or no effect

131 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

130 papers more in this group

See all 134 papers →

metsulfuron methyl · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

155 papers: 143 positive, 12 negative or no effect

142 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
    The mixture gave similar wheat grain yield to sequential application and weed-free conditions.

    Bio-efficacy of ready-mix formulation of clodinafop-propargyl + metsulfuron for control of mixed weed flora in wheat · 2015 · compared with sequential application of clodinafop 60 g/ha and metsulfuron 4 g/ha and weed free

    No difference from an alternativeCites this paper

  2. positive
  3. positive

151 papers more in this group

See all 155 papers →

climate site · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

154 papers: 72 positive, 82 negative or no effect

81 papers in the same direction as this paper · 72 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

150 papers more in this group

See all 154 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.