Paper · 2020 · Soil and Tillage Research

Temporal changes in soil microbial properties and nutrient dynamics under climate smart agriculture practices

H.S. Jat; Madhu Choudhary; Ashim Datta; et al.

12
claims
24
verbatim quotes
73
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Climate smart agriculture (CSA) practices are emerging as sustainable alternative to conventional rice-wheat system to pull up natural resources degradation across south Asia. After five years of continuous CSA based experiment, a two years study was conducted to evaluate changes in microbial biomasses (microbial biomass carbon and nitrogen), enzyme activities (alkaline phosphatase, dehydrogenase and β-glucosidase), nutrient release and uptake (N, P and K) at different wheat crop growth stages. Effect of CSA practices was also studied for carbon mineralization in an incubation experiment. Four scenarios (Sc) were included in this study- conventional tillage (CT) based rice-wheat system (Sc1), partial CSA based rice-wheat-mungbean system (Sc2), full CSA based rice-wheat-mungbean system (Sc3), and full CSA based maize-wheat-mungbean system (Sc4). Soil samples were collected from scenarios at 0–15 and 15−30 cm depth at different growth stages of wheat crop namely sowing, crown root initiation (CRI), active tillering, panicle initiation, and harvesting. Analysis of soil was done for chemical properties viz. pH, electrical conductivity, available N, P, K, NPK uptake and mineralizable carbon and biological properties viz., microbial biomass carbon (MBC), microbial biomass nitrogen (MBN), dehydrogenase activity (DHA), alkaline phosphatase activity (APA) and β-glucosidase. Significantly higher microbial biomass carbon (42 %) and nitrogen (79 %) were found in surface soil (0−15 cm depth) under CSA based scenarios (Sc2, Sc3 and Sc4) at harvest stage of wheat over CT based/ conventional scenario (Sc1). At surface soil, alkaline phosphatase, dehydrogenase and β-glucosidase activity was 58, 14 and 13 % higher in CSA based scenarios, respectively than CT based scenario. CSA based scenarios showed significantly higher C mineralization after 3 days of the incubation experiment at harvest. An increase of respectively 15, 48 and 17 % of N, P and K uptake was observed with CSA based scenarios than CT based scenario. At harvest stage, 7 % higher amount of dry matter was reported with full CSA based scenarios (mean of Sc2 to Sc4) compared to Sc1. Higher wheat grain yield of ∼10 % was recorded with CSA based scenarios over CT based scenario. Therefore, CSA based scenarios with improved biological properties and nutrient availability and uptake at different wheat growth stages resulted in higher yields and hence need to be popularized among the farmers.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

CSA scenarios raised surface-soil microbial biomass carbon by 42% at wheat harvest.

Organ / stage
harvest stagee0
Treatment
CSA based scenariose0
Outcome
microbial biomass carbone0
Direction
highere0
Value
42 %e0
Comparator
CT based/ conventional scenarioe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Significantly higher microbial biomass carbon (42 %) and nitrogen (79 %) were found in surface soil (0−15 cm depth) under CSA based scenarios (Sc2, Sc3 and Sc4) at harvest stage of wheat over CT based/ conventional scenario (Sc1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1388–1617 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat crop growth stages”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 474–498 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

CSA scenarios raised surface-soil microbial biomass nitrogen by 79% at wheat harvest.

Treatment
CSA based scenariose0
Outcome
nitrogene0
Direction
highere0
Value
79 %e0
Comparator
CT based/ conventional scenarioe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Significantly higher microbial biomass carbon (42 %) and nitrogen (79 %) were found in surface soil (0−15 cm depth) under CSA based scenarios (Sc2, Sc3 and Sc4) at harvest stage of wheat over CT based/ conventional scenario (Sc1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1388–1617 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat crop growth stages”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 474–498 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CSA scenarios raised surface-soil alkaline phosphatase activity by 58%.

Treatment
CSA based scenariose0
Outcome
alkaline phosphatasee0
Direction
highere0
Value
58e0
Comparator
CT based scenarioe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At surface soil, alkaline phosphatase, dehydrogenase and β-glucosidase activity was 58, 14 and 13 % higher in CSA based scenarios, respectively than CT based scenario”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1619–1785 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat crop growth stages”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 474–498 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CSA scenarios raised surface-soil dehydrogenase activity by 14%.

Treatment
CSA based scenariose0
Outcome
dehydrogenasee0
Direction
highere0
Value
14e0
Comparator
CT based scenarioe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At surface soil, alkaline phosphatase, dehydrogenase and β-glucosidase activity was 58, 14 and 13 % higher in CSA based scenarios, respectively than CT based scenario”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1619–1785 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat crop growth stages”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 474–498 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CSA scenarios raised surface-soil β-glucosidase activity by 13%.

Treatment
CSA based scenariose0
Outcome
β-glucosidase activitye0
Direction
highere0
Value
13 %e0
Comparator
CT based scenarioe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At surface soil, alkaline phosphatase, dehydrogenase and β-glucosidase activity was 58, 14 and 13 % higher in CSA based scenarios, respectively than CT based scenario”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1619–1785 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat crop growth stages”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 474–498 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

CSA scenarios increased carbon mineralization after three days of incubation.

Treatment
CSA based scenariose0
Outcome
C mineralizatione0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
after 3 dayse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“CSA based scenarios showed significantly higher C mineralization after 3 days of the incubation experiment at harvest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1787–1904 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat crop growth stages”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 474–498 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CSA scenarios increased wheat nitrogen uptake by 15%.

Treatment
CSA based scenariose0
Outcome
N, P and K uptakee0
Direction
increasee0
Value
15e0
Comparator
CT based scenarioe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“An increase of respectively 15, 48 and 17 % of N, P and K uptake was observed with CSA based scenarios than CT based scenario”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1906–2031 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat crop growth stages”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 474–498 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CSA scenarios increased wheat phosphorus uptake by 48%.

Treatment
CSA based scenariose0
Outcome
N, P and K uptakee0
Direction
increasee0
Value
48e0
Comparator
CT based scenarioe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“An increase of respectively 15, 48 and 17 % of N, P and K uptake was observed with CSA based scenarios than CT based scenario”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1906–2031 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat crop growth stages”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 474–498 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CSA scenarios increased wheat potassium uptake by 17%.

Treatment
CSA based scenariose0
Outcome
K uptakee0
Direction
increasee0
Value
17 %e0
Comparator
CT based scenarioe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“An increase of respectively 15, 48 and 17 % of N, P and K uptake was observed with CSA based scenarios than CT based scenario”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1906–2031 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat crop growth stages”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 474–498 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Full CSA scenarios had 7% more dry matter than Sc1 at harvest.

Treatment
full CSA based scenariose0
Outcome
dry mattere0
Direction
highere0
Value
7 %e0
Comparator
Sc1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At harvest stage, 7 % higher amount of dry matter was reported with full CSA based scenarios (mean of Sc2 to Sc4) compared to Sc1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2033–2162 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat crop growth stages”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 474–498 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CSA scenarios raised wheat grain yield by approximately 10%.

Treatment
CSA based scenariose0
Outcome
wheat grain yielde0
Direction
Highere0
Value
∼10 %e0
Comparator
CT based scenarioe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Higher wheat grain yield of ∼10 % was recorded with CSA based scenarios over CT based scenario”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2164–2258 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat crop growth stages”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 474–498 · show in text ↑
Recommendationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend wider farmer adoption of CSA scenarios.

Outcome
need to be popularized among the farmerse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“CSA based scenarios with improved biological properties and nutrient availability and uptake at different wheat growth stages resulted in higher yields and hence need to be popularized among the farmers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2271–2473 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat crop growth stages”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 474–498 · show in text ↑

climate site · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 7 positive, 8 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

climate site · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

31 papers: 13 positive, 18 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 18 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

27 papers more in this group

See all 31 papers →

climate site · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

154 papers: 72 positive, 82 negative or no effect

71 papers in the same direction as this paper · 79 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

150 papers more in this group

See all 154 papers →

climate site · soil: biology · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.