Intervention effectmodel-written summary

CSA scenarios raised surface-soil microbial biomass nitrogen by 79% at wheat harvest.

A claim from Temporal changes in soil microbial properties and nutrient dynamics under climate smart agriculture practices · 2020

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

CSA scenarios raised surface-soil microbial biomass nitrogen by 79% at wheat harvest.

Treatment
CSA based scenariose0
Outcome
nitrogene0
Direction
highere0
Value
79 %e0
Comparator
CT based/ conventional scenarioe0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Significantly higher microbial biomass carbon (42 %) and nitrogen (79 %) were found in surface soil (0−15 cm depth) under CSA based scenarios (Sc2, Sc3 and Sc4) at harvest stage of wheat over CT based/ conventional scenario (Sc1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1388–1617
t0

“wheat crop growth stages”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 474–498

Title

Temporal changes in soil microbial properties and nutrient dynamics under climate smart agriculture practices

H.S. Jat; Madhu Choudhary; Ashim Datta; et al. Soil and Tillage Research 2020. doi:10.1016/j.still.2020.104595

Other claims from this paper (11)

Record rev-a14fda78f96b4faa8b049311ffe052ffcd32bec42b456c80301f108dcf3904d4 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

climate site · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 7 positive, 8 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this claim · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. no effect

6 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.