Intervention effectmodel-written summary

The sulphur content in the plant growth environment was not associated with a change in the selenium content in the grain of the tested plants.

A claim from Selenium (IV) and Sulphur (VI) as Elements Modifying Plant Quality: Content of Selenium and Sulphur Forms in Wheat · 2026

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The sulphur content in the plant growth environment was not associated with a change in the selenium content in the grain of the tested plants.

Organ / stage
graine0
Treatment
sulphur content in the plant growth environmente0
Outcome
selenium content in the graine0
Direction
not associated with a changee0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–114
e0

“The sulphur content in the plant growth environment was not associated with a change in the selenium content in the grain of the tested plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1683–1825

Title

Selenium (IV) and Sulphur (VI) as Elements Modifying Plant Quality: Content of Selenium and Sulphur Forms in Wheat

Marzena S. Brodowska; Magdalena Kurzyna-Szklarek; Mirosław Wyszkowski Molecules 2026. doi:10.3390/molecules31010160

Other claims from this paper (15)

Record rev-5924acea1423181ec39675b89146fee8218b2674571ef4b640a1c5ecd9b51cdf · schema claims-v0.9 · position 14 in the model’s answer

sulfur atom · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

66 papers: 51 positive, 15 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this claim · 50 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

57 papers more in this group

See all 66 papers →

climate site · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 7 positive, 8 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this claim · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. negative

6 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.