Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Selenium fertilisation significantly increased the selenium content in the grain of common wheat.

A claim from Selenium (IV) and Sulphur (VI) as Elements Modifying Plant Quality: Content of Selenium and Sulphur Forms in Wheat · 2026

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Selenium fertilisation significantly increased the selenium content in the grain of common wheat.

Taxon
common wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
Selenium fertilisatione0
Outcome
content of this element in the graine0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Selenium fertilisation significantly increased the content of this element in the grain of spelt wheat and common wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 802–921

Title

Selenium (IV) and Sulphur (VI) as Elements Modifying Plant Quality: Content of Selenium and Sulphur Forms in Wheat

Marzena S. Brodowska; Magdalena Kurzyna-Szklarek; Mirosław Wyszkowski Molecules 2026. doi:10.3390/molecules31010160

Other claims from this paper (15)

Record rev-15869a8cb785b0603c92a82364bb8f6a10bfd1176e7b29daadba3e88c77c2c62 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

selenium atom · molecular: metabolites · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

27 papers: 22 positive, 5 negative or no effect

21 papers in the same direction as this claim · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. positive
  8. positive

18 papers more in this group

See all 27 papers →

fertilization · molecular: metabolites · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

288 papers: 232 positive, 56 negative or no effect

231 papers in the same direction as this claim · 54 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. no effect

279 papers more in this group

See all 288 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.