Paper · 2012 · Guangdong nongye kexue

Effects of spraying micronutrients on yield, quality and micronutrient content in grain of wheat.

Jiyuan Zhang; Pingping Zhang; Ma HongXiang; et al.

4
claims
4
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

The micronutrients zinc,ferrum and selenium were sprayed on the leaf surface at jointing and booting stage of wheat variety Ningmai 13.The results showed that the yield components,quality traits,and ferrum content in the grain were not significantly affected by these three kinds of micronutrients.But the zinc content and selenium content in the grain were improved greatly,and they were increased by 24.6% and forty-three times respectively.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Micronutrient sprays did not significantly affect wheat yield components or quality traits.

Material
Ningmai 13e0
Treatment
zinc,ferrum and seleniume0
Outcome
yield components,quality traitse0
Direction
not significantly affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The micronutrients zinc,ferrum and selenium were sprayed on the leaf surface at jointing and booting stage of wheat variety Ningmai 13.The results showed that the yield components,quality traits,and ferrum content in the grain were not significantly affected by these three kinds of micronutrients”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–297 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Micronutrient sprays did not significantly affect grain iron content.

Material
Ningmai 13e0
Treatment
zinc,ferrum and seleniume0
Outcome
ferrum content in the graine0
Direction
not significantly affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The micronutrients zinc,ferrum and selenium were sprayed on the leaf surface at jointing and booting stage of wheat variety Ningmai 13.The results showed that the yield components,quality traits,and ferrum content in the grain were not significantly affected by these three kinds of micronutrients”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–297 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain zinc content increased by 24.6% following foliar micronutrient sprays.

Outcome
zinc contente0
Direction
increasede0
Value
24.6%e0

Not reportedTaxonTreatmentComparator

Verbatim

e0

“the zinc content and selenium content in the grain were improved greatly,and they were increased by 24.6% and forty-three times respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 302–442 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain selenium content increased forty-three times following foliar micronutrient sprays.

Outcome
selenium contente0
Direction
increasede0
Value
forty-three timese0

Not reportedTaxonTreatmentComparator

Verbatim

e0

“the zinc content and selenium content in the grain were improved greatly,and they were increased by 24.6% and forty-three times respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 302–442 · show in text ↑

zinc atom · quality: general · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

19 papers: 15 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

zinc atom · molecular: metabolites · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

111 papers: 85 positive, 26 negative or no effect

25 papers in the same direction as this paper · 85 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

107 papers more in this group

See all 111 papers →

iron atom · quality: general · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

selenium atom · quality: general · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

iron atom · molecular: metabolites · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 11 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

selenium atom · molecular: metabolites · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

27 papers: 22 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 22 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

23 papers more in this group

See all 27 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.