Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Micronutrient sprays did not significantly affect grain iron content.

A claim from Effects of spraying micronutrients on yield, quality and micronutrient content in grain of wheat. · 2012

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Micronutrient sprays did not significantly affect grain iron content.

Material
Ningmai 13e0
Treatment
zinc,ferrum and seleniume0
Outcome
ferrum content in the graine0
Direction
not significantly affectede0

Not reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The micronutrients zinc,ferrum and selenium were sprayed on the leaf surface at jointing and booting stage of wheat variety Ningmai 13.The results showed that the yield components,quality traits,and ferrum content in the grain were not significantly affected by these three kinds of micronutrients”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–297

Title

Effects of spraying micronutrients on yield, quality and micronutrient content in grain of wheat.

Jiyuan Zhang; Pingping Zhang; Ma HongXiang; et al. Guangdong nongye kexue 2012

Other claims from this paper (3)

Record rev-27ea00b5f8d3073fb926be1a5a13260bdf7baf7fcf57200e949d45dae588f25e · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

zinc atom · molecular: metabolites · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

111 papers: 85 positive, 26 negative or no effect

25 papers in the same direction as this claim · 85 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
    Soil plus leaf zinc application gave a shoot zinc concentration of 82 mg per kg dry weight, the highest increase.

    Effect of different zinc application methods on grain yield and zinc concentration in wheat cultivars grown on zinc‐deficient calcareous soils · 1997

    Opposite direction

  2. positive
    Zn application increased ascorbate and reduced glutathione content of wheat flag leaves.

    Physiological Responses and Yield of Wheat Plants in Zinc-Mediated Alleviation of Drought Stress · 2017

    Opposite direction

  3. positive
    Zinc fertilization reduced seed phytic acid concentration from 10.7 to 9.1 mg g−1 on average.

    PHYTIC ACID AND PHOSPHORUS CONCENTRATIONS IN SEEDS OF WHEAT CULTIVARS GROWN WITH AND WITHOUT ZINC FERTILIZATION* · 2002

    Opposite direction

  4. positive
    Combined Pseudomonas and soil plus foliar zinc reduced phytate concentration and the phytate to zinc ratio in wheat grain compared with the control.

    Pseudomonas-aided zinc application improves the productivity and biofortification of bread wheat · 2018 · compared with the control

    Opposite direction

  5. positive
    Adding zinc with cadmium slightly lowered grain cadmium content.

    Transport of Cadmium via Xylem and Phloem in Maturing Wheat Shoots: Comparison with the Translocation of Zinc, Strontium and Rubidium · 1997

    Opposite direction

  6. positive
    Soil plus foliar Zn and Fe increased grain Zn by 46% compared with soil application.

    Zinc and Iron Concentration as Affected by Nitrogen Fertilization and Their Localization in Wheat Grain · 2018 · compared with soil application only

    Opposite direction

  7. positive
    Zinc supply decreased grain phytic acid and its molar ratio to zinc relative to Zn(0).

    Impacts of phosphorus and zinc levels on phosphorus and zinc nutrition and phytic acid concentration in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) · 2011 · compared with Zn(0) treatment

    Opposite direction

  8. positive
    Zn-NPs improved antioxidant activities in wheat.

    Mulberry based zinc nano-particles mitigate salinity induced toxic effects and improve the grain yield and zinc bio-fortification of wheat by improving antioxidant activities, photosynthetic performance, and accumulation of osmolytes and hormones · 2022 · compared with control

    Opposite direction

102 papers more in this group

See all 111 papers →

iron atom · molecular: metabolites · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 11 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this claim · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
    Soil plus foliar Zn and Fe increased grain Zn by 46% compared with soil application.

    Zinc and Iron Concentration as Affected by Nitrogen Fertilization and Their Localization in Wheat Grain · 2018 · compared with soil application only

    Opposite direction

  2. positive
    Iron application significantly increased soil NPK concentration over control.

    Effects of Iron on the Wheat Crop (Triticum aestivum L.) by Uptake of Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Potassium · 2012 · compared with control

    Opposite direction

  3. positive
    Glucose content peaked at 1.91 mg∙g−1 sample in offspring of 4 ppm Fe plus 4 ppm Zn priming.

    Hydropriming and Nutripriming of Bread Wheat Seeds Improved the Flour’s Nutritional Value of the First Unprimed Offspring · 2023

    Opposite direction

  4. positive
    Chelate additions increased their corresponding elements in wheat, particularly straw.

    New Fertilisers with Innovative Chelates in Wheat Cultivation · 2024

    Opposite direction

  5. positive
    Iron fertilizer increased corresponding grain iron content.

    Effects of Foliar Spraying Microelement Fertilizers on Yield and Quality of Winter Wheat · 2012

    Opposite direction

  6. positive
    Spraying iron enhanced iron content in grain.

    Grain Yield and Quality Responding to the Leaf Surface Spraying the Different Nutritive Elements Operation in Winter Wheat · 2011

    Opposite direction

  7. positive
    Iron nanopowder increased whole-plant polysaccharides by 4.2%.

    Effect of iron nanopowder on the physiological resistance of winter wheat to low temperatures · 2022

    Opposite direction

  8. positive
    Wheat and barley withstand higher 2,4-D concentrations when an iron additive is included in the spray solution.

    Iron additives influence plant reactions to 2,4-D concentrations · 1964

    Opposite direction

8 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

selenium atom · molecular: metabolites · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

27 papers: 22 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this claim · 22 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
    Selenium foliar application increased non-enzymatic antioxidant compounds relative to untreated wheat.

    Physiological and Biochemical Mechanisms of Exogenously Applied Selenium for Alleviating Destructive Impacts Induced by Salinity Stress in Bread Wheat · 2021 · compared with untreated plants

    Opposite direction

  2. positive
    Selenium treated plants had higher nitrite concentrations.

    Effect of selenium on CO2 and NO3- assimilation under low and adequate nitrogen supply in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) · 2014

    Opposite direction

  3. positive
    Selenium concentration increased significantly in treated leaves and grains versus control.

    Influence of selenium on carbohydrate accumulation in developing wheat grains · 2018 · compared with control

    Opposite direction

  4. positive
    Fertigation and foliar spray yielded maximum shoot selenium accumulation under drought.

    Selenium supply methods and time of application influence spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) yield under water deficit conditions · 2016

    Opposite direction

  5. positive
    Selenium decreased nickel accumulation in shoots and roots.

    Alleviation of nickel toxicity in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) seedlings by selenium supplementation · 2013

    Opposite direction

  6. positive
    Selenium plus silicon increased glutathione.

    Silicon-Selenium Interplay Imparts Cadmium Resistance in Wheat through an Up-Regulating Antioxidant System · 2023

    Opposite direction

  7. positive
    Foliar Se significantly increased grain Se concentration.

    Agronomic biofortification of genetically biofortified wheat genotypes with zinc, selenium, iodine, and iron under field conditions · 2024

    Opposite direction

  8. positive
    Selenium generally promoted micronutrient uptake.

    Translocation of elements and sugars in wheat genotypes at vegetative and generative stages under continuous selenium exposure · 2019

    Opposite direction

18 papers more in this group

See all 27 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.