Paper · 2023 · International Journal of Molecular Sciences

Silicon-Selenium Interplay Imparts Cadmium Resistance in Wheat through an Up-Regulating Antioxidant System

Maria Manzoor; Muna Ali Abdalla; Md Arif Hussain; et al.

11
claims
25
verbatim quotes
15
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Cadmium (Cd), being a highly toxic heavy metal, significantly impacts plant growth and development by altering nutrient uptake and causing oxidative and structural damage, resulting in reduced yield. To combat Cd toxicity and accumulation in wheat, it was hypothesized that co-application of Selenium (Se) and Silicon (Si) can reduce the adverse effect of Cd and regulate Cd resistance while improving Se fortification in wheat. Therefore, this study evaluated the comparative effect of Se and Si on the growth and antioxidant defense systems of wheat plants grown in a hydroponic setup. Briefly, the plants were acclimatized to the hydroponic solution for 1 week and then exposed to 10 µmol Cd. Afterwards, the treatments, including 0.2 mmol Si and 1.5 µmol Se, were applied as a root and foliar application, respectively. Plants supplemented with both Se and Si showed improved biomass and other physiological growth attributes, and this response was associated with improved activity/contents of antioxidants, including glutathione (GSH) content, glutathione reductase (GR), ascorbate peroxidase (APX), and catalase (CAT), with related lowering of hydrogen peroxide, malondialdehyde content, and structural damages. Moreover, by Se + Si supplementation, a decrease in total S levels in plant tissues was observed, whereas an increase in total protein concentration and GSH indicated a different and novel mechanism of Cd tolerance and S homeostasis in the plant. It was observed that Si was more involved in significantly reducing Cd translocation by stabilizing Cd in the root and reducing its content in the soluble fraction in both the root and shoot. Whereas Se was found to play the main role in reducing the oxidative damage caused by Cd, and the effect was more profound in the shoot. In addition, this study also observed a positive correlation between Si and Se for relative uptake, which had not been reported earlier. Our findings show that the Se and Si doses together benefit growth regulation and nutrient uptake; additionally, their combinations support the Cd resistance mechanism in wheat through upregulation of the antioxidant system and control of Cd translocation and subcellular distribution, ultimately contributing to the nutritional quality of wheat produced. Thus, it is concluded that the co-application of Se and Si has improved the nutritional quality while reducing the Cd risk in wheat and therefore needs to be employed as a potential strategy to ensure food safety in a Cd-contaminated environment.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined selenium and silicon improved wheat biomass and physiological growth attributes under cadmium.

Treatment
both Se and Sie0
Outcome
biomass and other physiological growth attributese0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plants supplemented with both Se and Si showed improved biomass and other physiological growth attributes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 824–929 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–62 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined supplementation increased antioxidant activity or content.

Treatment
Se + Si supplementatione1
Outcome
activity/contents of antioxidants, including glutathione (GSH) content, glutathione reductase (GR), ascorbate peroxidase (APX), and catalase (CAT)e0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“improved activity/contents of antioxidants, including glutathione (GSH) content, glutathione reductase (GR), ascorbate peroxidase (APX), and catalase (CAT)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 969–1124 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–62 · show in text ↑
e1

“Se + Si supplementation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1232–1255 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined supplementation lowered hydrogen peroxide, malondialdehyde, and structural damage.

Outcome
hydrogen peroxide, malondialdehyde content, and structural damagese0
Direction
loweringe0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“with related lowering of hydrogen peroxide, malondialdehyde content, and structural damages.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1126–1218 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–62 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Selenium plus silicon decreased total sulfur in plant tissues.

Treatment
Se + Si supplementatione0
Outcome
total S levels in plant tissuese0
Direction
decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“by Se + Si supplementation, a decrease in total S levels in plant tissues was observed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1229–1315 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–62 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Selenium plus silicon increased total protein concentration.

Treatment
Se + Si supplementatione1
Outcome
total protein concentratione0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“an increase in total protein concentration and GSH”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1325–1375 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–62 · show in text ↑
e1

“Se + Si supplementation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1232–1255 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Selenium plus silicon increased glutathione.

Treatment
Se + Si supplementatione1
Outcome
GSHe0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“an increase in total protein concentration and GSH”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1325–1375 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–62 · show in text ↑
e1

“Se + Si supplementation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1232–1255 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Silicon significantly reduced cadmium translocation.

Organ / stage
root and shoote0
Treatment
Sie0
Outcome
Cd translocatione0
Direction
reducinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Si was more involved in significantly reducing Cd translocation by stabilizing Cd in the root and reducing its content in the soluble fraction in both the root and shoot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1487–1656 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–62 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Silicon reduced soluble cadmium content in root and shoot.

Organ / stage
root and shoote0
Treatment
Sie1
Outcome
content in the soluble fractione0
Direction
reducinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“reducing its content in the soluble fraction in both the root and shoot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1585–1656 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–62 · show in text ↑
e1

“Se + Si supplementation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1232–1255 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Selenium reduced cadmium-induced oxidative damage, especially in shoots.

Organ / stage
shoote0
Treatment
See0
Outcome
oxidative damage caused by Cde0
Direction
reducinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Se was found to play the main role in reducing the oxidative damage caused by Cd, and the effect was more profound in the shoot.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1666–1794 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–62 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Silicon and selenium relative uptake were positively correlated.

Compound
Si and See0
Outcome
relative uptakee0
Direction
positive correlatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a positive correlation between Si and Se for relative uptake”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1833–1893 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–62 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend combined selenium and silicon to improve nutritional quality and reduce cadmium risk.

Treatment
co-application of Se and Sie0
Outcome
needs to be employed as a potential strategye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“co-application of Se and Si has improved the nutritional quality while reducing the Cd risk in wheat and therefore needs to be employed as a potential strategy”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2319–2478 · show in text ↑

selenium atom · quality: protein · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

7 papers: 4 positive, 3 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

silicon atom · physiology: antioxidant enzymes · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

31 papers: 29 positive, 2 negative or no effect

28 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

27 papers more in this group

See all 31 papers →

silicon atom · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

81 papers: 74 positive, 7 negative or no effect

73 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

77 papers more in this group

See all 81 papers →

selenium atom · physiology: antioxidant enzymes · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 12 positive, 1 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

selenium atom · physiology: oxidative · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 10 positive, 3 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

selenium atom · molecular: metabolites · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

27 papers: 22 positive, 5 negative or no effect

21 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

23 papers more in this group

See all 27 papers →

silicon atom · molecular: metabolites · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

34 papers: 32 positive, 2 negative or no effect

31 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

30 papers more in this group

See all 34 papers →

silicon atom · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

61 papers: 58 positive, 3 negative or no effect

57 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

57 papers more in this group

See all 61 papers →

8 of 10 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.