Paper · 2009 · Journal of Phytopathology

Wheat Resistance to Bacterial Leaf Streak Mediated by Silicon

Ivanete Tonole Silva; Fabrício Ávila Rodrigues; José Rogério Oliveira; et al.

16
claims
43
verbatim quotes
59
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Leaf streak, caused by Xanthomonas translucens pv. undulosa, is the major bacterial disease of wheat in Brazil and other countries worldwide. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of silicon (Si) on disease development and the biochemical mechanisms possibly involved in resistance potentialized by this element. Plants of cv. BR-18, susceptible to leaf streak, were grown in plastic pots containing Si-deficient soil amended with either calcium silicate (+Si) or calcium carbonate (−Si). The content of Si increased (P ≤ 0.05) by 96.5% for the +Si when compared with −Si treatment. There was no difference (P ≥ 0.05) between Si treatments for calcium content on leaf tissue, so variations in Si accounted for differences in the level of resistance to leaf streak. There was no difference (P ≥ 0.05) between Si treatments for incubation period, latent period, necrotic leaf area, and severity estimated by the software quant. However, chlorotic leaf area was reduced (P ≤ 0.05) by 50.2% for the +Si when compared with −Si treatment. There was no difference (P ≥ 0.05) between Si treatments for the bacteria population on leaf tissue; however, the values seemed to be somewhat lower in the +Si treatment from 4 to 8 days after inoculation (d.a.i.) on leaves from plants supplied with Si. There was no difference (P ≥ 0.05) between Si treatments for electrolyte leakage. The concentration of total soluble phenolics and lignin-thioglycolic acid (LTGA) derivatives did not show any apparent signs of increase during the course of infection and seemed to be slightly higher on plants not supplied with Si at the most advanced stages of bacterial infection. Chitinase activity was high at the most advanced stages of bacterial infection on leaves from +Si treatment and probably affected bacterial growth on leaf tissue. Peroxidase activity following bacterial infection was not increased by Si, but can be linked with the highest concentration of LTGA derivatives at 12 d.a.i. of plants supplied with Si. Polyphenoloxidase activity did not affect wheat resistance to leaf streak regarding of the Si treatments. The results clearly suggest that supplying Si to wheat plants can increase resistance to leaf streak possibly through an increase in tissue lignification and the participation of chitinases and peroxidases.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 16

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Silicon supply increased leaf Si content by 96.5% relative to no silicon

Material
BR-18e1
Treatment
calcium silicate (+Si)e1
Outcome
content of Sie2
Direction
increasede2
Value
96.5%e2
Comparator
calcium carbonate (−Si)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat Resistance to Bacterial Leaf Streak Mediated by Silicon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–61 · show in text ↑
e1

“Plants of cv. BR-18, susceptible to leaf streak, were grown in plastic pots containing Si-deficient soil amended with either calcium silicate (+Si) or calcium carbonate (−Si)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 315–489 · show in text ↑
e2

“The content of Si increased (P ≤ 0.05) by 96.5% for the +Si when compared with −Si treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 491–583 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Silicon supply reduced chlorotic leaf area of wheat by 50.2% relative to no silicon

Treatment
calcium silicate (+Si)e1
Outcome
chlorotic leaf areae3
Direction
reducede3
Value
50.2%e3
Comparator
calcium carbonate (−Si)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat Resistance to Bacterial Leaf Streak Mediated by Silicon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–61 · show in text ↑
e1

“Plants of cv. BR-18, susceptible to leaf streak, were grown in plastic pots containing Si-deficient soil amended with either calcium silicate (+Si) or calcium carbonate (−Si)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 315–489 · show in text ↑
e3

“chlorotic leaf area was reduced (P ≤ 0.05) by 50.2% for the +Si when compared with −Si treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 937–1033 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Silicon supply made no difference to incubation period, latent period or necrotic leaf area

Treatment
calcium silicate (+Si)e1
Outcome
incubation period, latent period, necrotic leaf areae4
Direction
no differencee4
Comparator
calcium carbonate (−Si)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat Resistance to Bacterial Leaf Streak Mediated by Silicon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–61 · show in text ↑
e1

“Plants of cv. BR-18, susceptible to leaf streak, were grown in plastic pots containing Si-deficient soil amended with either calcium silicate (+Si) or calcium carbonate (−Si)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 315–489 · show in text ↑
e4

“There was no difference (P ≥ 0.05) between Si treatments for incubation period, latent period, necrotic leaf area”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 767–880 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Silicon supply made no difference to leaf streak severity estimated by software

Treatment
calcium silicate (+Si)e1
Outcome
severity estimated by the software quante5
Direction
no differencee5
Comparator
calcium carbonate (−Si)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat Resistance to Bacterial Leaf Streak Mediated by Silicon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–61 · show in text ↑
e1

“Plants of cv. BR-18, susceptible to leaf streak, were grown in plastic pots containing Si-deficient soil amended with either calcium silicate (+Si) or calcium carbonate (−Si)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 315–489 · show in text ↑
e5

“There was no difference (P ≥ 0.05) between Si treatments for incubation period, latent period, necrotic leaf area, and severity estimated by the software quant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 767–926 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Silicon supply made no difference to calcium content of wheat leaf tissue

Treatment
calcium silicate (+Si)e1
Outcome
calcium content on leaf tissuee6
Direction
no differencee6
Comparator
calcium carbonate (−Si)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat Resistance to Bacterial Leaf Streak Mediated by Silicon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–61 · show in text ↑
e1

“Plants of cv. BR-18, susceptible to leaf streak, were grown in plastic pots containing Si-deficient soil amended with either calcium silicate (+Si) or calcium carbonate (−Si)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 315–489 · show in text ↑
e6

“There was no difference (P ≥ 0.05) between Si treatments for calcium content on leaf tissue”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 585–676 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Silicon supply made no difference to the bacterial population on leaf tissue

Treatment
calcium silicate (+Si)e1
Outcome
bacteria population on leaf tissuee7
Direction
no differencee7
Comparator
calcium carbonate (−Si)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat Resistance to Bacterial Leaf Streak Mediated by Silicon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–61 · show in text ↑
e1

“Plants of cv. BR-18, susceptible to leaf streak, were grown in plastic pots containing Si-deficient soil amended with either calcium silicate (+Si) or calcium carbonate (−Si)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 315–489 · show in text ↑
e7

“There was no difference (P ≥ 0.05) between Si treatments for the bacteria population on leaf tissue”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1035–1134 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacterial population on leaf tissue seemed somewhat lower with silicon supply at 4 to 8 days after inoculation

Treatment
+Si treatmente3
Outcome
bacteria population on leaf tissuee2
Direction
lowere3
Comparator
calcium carbonate (−Si)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat Resistance to Bacterial Leaf Streak Mediated by Silicon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–61 · show in text ↑
e1

“Plants of cv. BR-18, susceptible to leaf streak, were grown in plastic pots containing Si-deficient soil amended with either calcium silicate (+Si) or calcium carbonate (−Si)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 315–489 · show in text ↑
e2

“There was no difference (P ≥ 0.05) between Si treatments for the bacteria population on leaf tissue”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1035–1134 · show in text ↑
e3

“the values seemed to be somewhat lower in the +Si treatment from 4 to 8 days after inoculation (d.a.i.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1145–1248 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Silicon supply made no difference to electrolyte leakage from wheat leaves

Treatment
calcium silicate (+Si)e1
Outcome
electrolyte leakagee2
Direction
no differencee2
Comparator
calcium carbonate (−Si)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat Resistance to Bacterial Leaf Streak Mediated by Silicon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–61 · show in text ↑
e1

“Plants of cv. BR-18, susceptible to leaf streak, were grown in plastic pots containing Si-deficient soil amended with either calcium silicate (+Si) or calcium carbonate (−Si)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 315–489 · show in text ↑
e2

“There was no difference (P ≥ 0.05) between Si treatments for electrolyte leakage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1289–1369 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total soluble phenolics and LTGA derivatives did not increase during wheat infection

Outcome
concentration of total soluble phenolics and lignin-thioglycolic acid (LTGA) derivativese1
Direction
increasee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat Resistance to Bacterial Leaf Streak Mediated by Silicon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–61 · show in text ↑
e1

“The concentration of total soluble phenolics and lignin-thioglycolic acid (LTGA) derivatives did not show any apparent signs of increase during the course of infection”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1371–1538 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phenolics and LTGA derivatives seemed slightly higher in wheat not supplied with silicon at the most advanced infection stages

Treatment
not supplied with Sie2
Outcome
concentration of total soluble phenolics and lignin-thioglycolic acid (LTGA) derivativese1
Direction
highere2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat Resistance to Bacterial Leaf Streak Mediated by Silicon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–61 · show in text ↑
e1

“The concentration of total soluble phenolics and lignin-thioglycolic acid (LTGA) derivatives did not show any apparent signs of increase during the course of infection”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1371–1538 · show in text ↑
e2

“seemed to be slightly higher on plants not supplied with Si at the most advanced stages of bacterial infection”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1543–1653 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chitinase activity was high in silicon-supplied wheat leaves at the most advanced infection stages

Treatment
+Si treatmente1
Outcome
Chitinase activitye1
Direction
highe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat Resistance to Bacterial Leaf Streak Mediated by Silicon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–61 · show in text ↑
e1

“Chitinase activity was high at the most advanced stages of bacterial infection on leaves from +Si treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1655–1762 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Chitinase activity probably reduced growth of Xanthomonas translucens pv. undulosa on wheat leaves

Interactor
Xanthomonas translucens pv. undulosaXanthomonas translucens pv. undulosae0pathogen
Gene
Chitinasee2
Outcome
bacterial growth on leaf tissuee3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Xanthomonas translucens pv. undulosa
Xanthomonas translucens pv. undulosa · Interactor · picture of the speciesJarober3 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat Resistance to Bacterial Leaf Streak Mediated by Silicon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–61 · show in text ↑
e0

“Leaf streak, caused by Xanthomonas translucens pv. undulosa, is the major bacterial disease of wheat in Brazil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–110 · show in text ↑
e2

“Chitinase activity was high at the most advanced stages of bacterial infection on leaves from +Si treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1655–1762 · show in text ↑
e3

“probably affected bacterial growth on leaf tissue”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1767–1816 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Peroxidase activity was not increased by silicon during wheat infection

Treatment
Sie2
Outcome
Peroxidase activitye2
Direction
not increasede2
Qualifier
following bacterial infectione2
Comparator
calcium carbonate (−Si)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat Resistance to Bacterial Leaf Streak Mediated by Silicon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–61 · show in text ↑
e1

“Plants of cv. BR-18, susceptible to leaf streak, were grown in plastic pots containing Si-deficient soil amended with either calcium silicate (+Si) or calcium carbonate (−Si)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 315–489 · show in text ↑
e2

“Peroxidase activity following bacterial infection was not increased by Si”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1818–1891 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Peroxidase activity may be linked with the highest LTGA derivative concentration at 12 days after inoculation in silicon-supplied plants

Treatment
plants supplied with Sie1
Outcome
concentration of LTGA derivativese1
Direction
higheste1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat Resistance to Bacterial Leaf Streak Mediated by Silicon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–61 · show in text ↑
e1

“can be linked with the highest concentration of LTGA derivatives at 12 d.a.i. of plants supplied with Si”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1897–2001 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Polyphenoloxidase activity did not affect wheat resistance to leaf streak under either silicon treatment

Treatment
Si treatmentse1
Gene
Polyphenoloxidasee1
Outcome
wheat resistance to leaf streake1
Direction
did not affecte1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Polyphenoloxidase activity did not affect wheat resistance to leaf streak regarding of the Si treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2003–2107 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Supplying silicon to wheat can increase resistance to leaf streak, possibly through tissue lignification and chitinases and peroxidases

Treatment
supplying Sie1
Outcome
resistance to leaf streake1
Direction
increasee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The results clearly suggest that supplying Si to wheat plants can increase resistance to leaf streak possibly through an increase in tissue lignification and the participation of chitinases and peroxidases”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2109–2314 · show in text ↑

silicon atom · pest · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

10 papers: 7 positive, 3 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

silicon atom · physiology: antioxidant enzymes · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

31 papers: 29 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 29 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

27 papers more in this group

See all 31 papers →

calcium silicate · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

calcium silicate · pest · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

calcium silicate · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

calcium silicate · molecular: metabolites · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

calcium silicate · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.