Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Silicon supply increased leaf Si content by 96.5% relative to no silicon

A claim from Wheat Resistance to Bacterial Leaf Streak Mediated by Silicon · 2009

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Silicon supply increased leaf Si content by 96.5% relative to no silicon

Material
BR-18e1
Treatment
calcium silicate (+Si)e1
Outcome
content of Sie2
Direction
increasede2
Value
96.5%e2
Comparator
calcium carbonate (−Si)e1

Not reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat Resistance to Bacterial Leaf Streak Mediated by Silicon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–61
e1

“Plants of cv. BR-18, susceptible to leaf streak, were grown in plastic pots containing Si-deficient soil amended with either calcium silicate (+Si) or calcium carbonate (−Si)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 315–489
e2

“The content of Si increased (P ≤ 0.05) by 96.5% for the +Si when compared with −Si treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 491–583

Title

Wheat Resistance to Bacterial Leaf Streak Mediated by Silicon

Ivanete Tonole Silva; Fabrício Ávila Rodrigues; José Rogério Oliveira; et al. Journal of Phytopathology 2009. doi:10.1111/j.1439-0434.2009.01610.x

Other claims from this paper (15)

Record rev-f7510f59455c946de7ea9c22b29c6ed4c287666ddd5c850614189eea17ef192c · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

calcium silicate · molecular: metabolites · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.