Paper · 2006 · Pest Management Science

Boosting silica levels in wheat leaves reduces grazing by rabbits

Jane V Cotterill; Richard W Watkins; Clare B Brennon; et al.

9
claims
13
verbatim quotes
57
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Systemic application of sodium silicate can significantly enhance the levels of leaf silica in winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L. cv. Mercia), suggesting that this material could reduce the palatability of plants to vertebrate herbivores (e.g. rabbits, Oryctolagus cuniculus L.). A bioassay was developed using hydroponically grown wheat plants. Plants treated with sodium silicate were significantly more resistant to grazing by wild rabbits than untreated plants, with severe, potentially lethal feeding damage being reduced by over 50%. Further studies were carried out to develop more practical techniques for boosting silica levels in plants using silicon-rich 'fertilisers' including calcium silicate and calcium silicate slag (CSS). Silica levels were elevated in the plant 1.9-2.8 times over the control through the application of various silicon materials, in line with those of the hydroponic treatment. Encouragingly, levels of silica were elevated even in young wheat plants, which are most vulnerable to rabbit damage, and in a range of wheat varieties. The use of CSS is particularly promising because of its lower cost in comparison with calcium silicate, and it has a proven track record in slag fertilisation of rice and sugar cane crops. At the optimum CSS application rate of 3 g silicon L(-1) soil, wheat silica levels were approximately doubled, with no detrimental impacts on long-term growth or yield.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Plants treated with sodium silicate were significantly more resistant to grazing by wild rabbits than untreated plants.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
sodium silicatee1
Interactor
wild rabbitse1herbivore
Outcome
grazing by wild rabbitse1
Direction
more resistante1
Comparator
untreated plantse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Systemic application of sodium silicate can significantly enhance the levels of leaf silica in winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L. cv. Mercia)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–141 · show in text ↑
e1

“Plants treated with sodium silicate were significantly more resistant to grazing by wild rabbits than untreated plants, with severe, potentially lethal feeding damage being reduced by over 50%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 346–538 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sodium silicate reduced feeding damage by over 50% compared with untreated plants.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
sodium silicatee1
Interactor
wild rabbitse1herbivore
Outcome
feeding damagee1
Direction
reducede1
Value
over 50%e1
Comparator
untreated plantse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Systemic application of sodium silicate can significantly enhance the levels of leaf silica in winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L. cv. Mercia)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–141 · show in text ↑
e1

“Plants treated with sodium silicate were significantly more resistant to grazing by wild rabbits than untreated plants, with severe, potentially lethal feeding damage being reduced by over 50%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 346–538 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Systemic sodium silicate application significantly enhanced leaf silica levels in winter wheat.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Material
Merciae0
Treatment
Systemic application of sodium silicatee0
Outcome
levels of leaf silicae0
Direction
enhancee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Systemic application of sodium silicate can significantly enhance the levels of leaf silica in winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L. cv. Mercia)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–141 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Silicon materials elevated plant silica levels 1.9-2.8 times over the control.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
application of various silicon materialse2
Outcome
Silica levelse2
Direction
elevatede2
Value
1.9-2.8 timese2
Comparator
the controle2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Systemic application of sodium silicate can significantly enhance the levels of leaf silica in winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L. cv. Mercia)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–141 · show in text ↑
e2

“Silica levels were elevated in the plant 1.9-2.8 times over the control through the application of various silicon materials, in line with those of the hydroponic treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 740–912 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Silica levels after silicon material application were in line with those of the hydroponic treatment.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
application of various silicon materialse2
Outcome
Silica levelse2
Direction
no_changeinferrede2
Comparator
hydroponic treatmente2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Systemic application of sodium silicate can significantly enhance the levels of leaf silica in winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L. cv. Mercia)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–141 · show in text ↑
e2

“Silica levels were elevated in the plant 1.9-2.8 times over the control through the application of various silicon materials, in line with those of the hydroponic treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 740–912 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Levels of silica were elevated even in young wheat plants.

Organ / stage
young wheat plantse3
Outcome
levels of silicae3
Direction
elevatede3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“levels of silica were elevated even in young wheat plants, which are most vulnerable to rabbit damage, and in a range of wheat varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 929–1065 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Levels of silica were elevated in a range of wheat varieties.

Material
a range of wheat varietiese3
Outcome
levels of silicae3
Direction
elevatede3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“levels of silica were elevated even in young wheat plants, which are most vulnerable to rabbit damage, and in a range of wheat varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 929–1065 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At the optimum CSS application rate, wheat silica levels were approximately doubled.

Treatment
CSS application rate of 3 g silicon L(-1) soile4
Outcome
wheat silica levelse4
Direction
approximately doublede4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“At the optimum CSS application rate of 3 g silicon L(-1) soil, wheat silica levels were approximately doubled, with no detrimental impacts on long-term growth or yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1256–1423 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At the optimum CSS application rate, wheat long-term growth or yield showed no detrimental impact.

Treatment
CSS application rate of 3 g silicon L(-1) soile4
Outcome
long-term growth or yielde4
Direction
no_changeinferrede4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“At the optimum CSS application rate of 3 g silicon L(-1) soil, wheat silica levels were approximately doubled, with no detrimental impacts on long-term growth or yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1256–1423 · show in text ↑

calcium silicate · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

5 papers: 2 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

silicon atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

90 papers: 85 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 85 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

86 papers more in this group

See all 90 papers →

calcium silicate · molecular: metabolites · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

silicon atom · molecular: metabolites · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

34 papers: 32 positive, 2 negative or no effect

31 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

30 papers more in this group

See all 34 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.