Intervention effectmodel-written summary

The three silicon forms did not differ significantly in grain yield in 2020/21.

A claim from Influence of Silicon Forms on Nutrients Accumulation and Grain Yield of Wheat Under Water Deficit Conditions · 2022

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The three silicon forms did not differ significantly in grain yield in 2020/21.

Treatment
potassium silicate, calcium silicate, and aluminum silicatee0
Outcome
grain yield ha −1e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingDirectionValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The differences between potassium silicate, calcium silicate, and aluminum silicate were not significant in flag leaf greenness (SPAD value), grains weight spike −1 , weight of 1000 grains, and grain yield ha −1 in 2020/21 season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1379–1608
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–77

Title

Influence of Silicon Forms on Nutrients Accumulation and Grain Yield of Wheat Under Water Deficit Conditions

Emad M. M. Salem; Mohammed K. M. Kenawey; Hani Saber Saudy; et al. Gesunde Pflanzen 2022. doi:10.1007/s10343-022-00629-y

Other claims from this paper (12)

Record rev-cbc506ec4e3695a3488538370f206818bc1fd58e19ca8f8024e8d1e3e74530ec · schema claims-v0.9 · position 8 in the model’s answer

calcium silicate · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

5 papers: 2 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this claim · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
    Calcium silicate increased yield by 10% in 2008.

    Calcium Silicate Suppresses Powdery Mildew and Increases Yield of Field Grown Wheat · 2010

    Opposite direction

  2. positive
    Calcium silicate increased yields of field-grown winter wheat compared with calcium carbonate.

    Crop response to silicon supplements in New Jersey · 2011 · compared with calcium carbonate

    Opposite direction

  3. no effect
    At the optimum CSS application rate, wheat long-term growth or yield showed no detrimental impact.

    Boosting silica levels in wheat leaves reduces grazing by rabbits · 2006

    Same direction

  4. no effect
    Calcium silicate did not affect wheat height, spikes per pot or shoot dry matter.

    Effect of silicate on nutrition and yield of wheat · 2014

    Same direction

See all 5 papers →

silicate(4-) · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

20 papers: 18 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this claim · 17 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
    Potassium silicate improved wheat grain weight per spike under IW80 or IW60 by about 1.06 times.

    Effect of Potassium Silicate and Irrigation on Grain Nutrient Uptake and Water Use Efficiency of Wheat Under Calcareous Soils · 2022

    Opposite directionCites this paper

  2. positive
    Potassium silicate increased wheat grain and straw yield, harvest index, yield efficiency, and thousand-grain weight.

    Effect of Soil Amendments and Spraying with Antioxidants on Some Clay Soil Properties and Wheat Production under Climate Change Conditions · 2023

    Opposite directionCites this paper

  3. positive
    Calcium and magnesium silicate without A. brasilense inoculation increased wheat grain yield.

    Assessing Forms of Application of Azospirillum brasilense Associated with Silicon Use on Wheat · 2019 · compared with without A. brasilense inoculation

    Opposite direction

  4. positive
    Silicate improved wheat yield in acid clayey Rhodic Hapludox.

    Effects of silicate application on soil fertility and wheat yield · 2015

    Opposite direction

  5. positive
    Foliar potassium silicate alone increased growth and yield components under salinity.

    Effect of Potassium Humate and Potassium Silicate on Growth and Productivity of Wheat Plants Grown under Saline Conditions. · 2017

    Opposite direction

  6. positive
    Combined silicate and fertilizer increased grain yield by 108%.

    Impact of silicate fertilizer on soil properties and yield of bread wheat in Nitisols of tropical environment · 2023 · compared with untreated soil

    Opposite direction

  7. positive
    The 1000-grain weight increased significantly.

    Effects of Potassium Silicate Fertilizer on Photosynthetic Characteristics and Yield in Winter Wheat (Triticum Aestivum L.) · 2021

    Opposite direction

  8. positive
    Potassium silicate foliar application produced the maximum yield and yield ingredients relative to other foliar treatments in both seasons.

    Consequence of Sprinkling with Nano Zinc and Nano Selenium as well as Potassium Silicate on Yields And Excellence of Wheat Grains under Water Stress Conditions · 2021 · compared with other studied foliar application transactions

    Opposite direction

11 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

aluminium atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 3 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this claim · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
    Aluminum silicate increased thousand-seed weight of wheat regardless of salt stress.

    Aluminium silicate fertilization in the quality of wheat seeds under salt stress · 2015

    Opposite direction

  2. positive
    Booting-stage spraying excelled in grain yield at 7,406 tons h -1.

    Effect of Spraying Stages of Micro-Nano Elements on some Productive and Economical Traits of Wheat Cultivars (Triticum aestivum L.) · 2023

    Opposite direction

  3. positive
    At West-West Al-Minya, both varieties had higher grain yield.

    Influence of Plantation in a Saline-Stressed Location on the Agronomical Characteristics and Technological Quality of Flour and Baladi Bread for Two Egyptian Wheat Varieties · 2024 · compared with normal conditions

    Opposite direction

  4. negative
    Al inhibited border cell production and release in Scout 66.

    Inhibition of growth and development of root border cells in wheat by Al · 2003

    Same direction

  5. negative
    In high EC solutions, more than 200 μM Al was required to reduce wheat plant mass production below 50% of control.

    Effects of Aluminum Toxicity on Wheat Plants Cultivated Under Conditions of Varying Ionic Strength · 2004 · compared with control

    Same direction

  6. negative
    Aluminum and phosphorus shortage reduced maximum and final tiller numbers.

    Phyllochron and tillering of wheat in response to soil aluminum toxicity and phosphorus deficiency · 2010

    Same direction

  7. negative
    Grain yield decreased 23% at the highest Al rate.

    Aluminum stress and lime application affect growth, yield, and disease resistance of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) varieties under acidic soil conditions · 2025

    Same direction

  8. negative
    Strong edaphic stress (pH 3.8, 211 mg/kg Al3+) sharply decreased spring wheat yield by 88.2% compared with background 1 (pH 4.3, 5.4 mg/kg Al3+).

    The effect of long-term edaphic stress on the characteristics of next generation of spring wheat hybrids seedlings · 2021 · compared with background 1 (pH = 4.3; Al 3+ = 5.4 mg/kg of soil)

    Same direction

See all 9 papers →

3 of 4 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.