Paper · 2021 · Bangladesh Journal of Botany

Effects of Potassium Silicate Fertilizer on Photosynthetic Characteristics and Yield in Winter Wheat (Triticum Aestivum L.)

Wubo Li; Meng Li; Yunshuo Xu; et al.

6
claims
18
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Effects of different dosages of potassium silicate fertilizer on photosynthetic characteristics and yield of winter wheat under field conditions were studied. Four different dosages: 0, 45, 90 and 135kg/ha were applied. Results showed that the chlorophyll content, net photosynthetic rate of wheat flag leaf firstly increased and then decreased with the increase of levels of potassium silicate fertilizer. By the change of SPAD values after flowering, when the application of potassium silicate fertilizer was 90 kg/ha, the existence time of chlorophyll in flag leaf was significantly long, and the net photosynthetic rate was significantly increased. The 1000-grain weight of winter wheat significantly increased and the yield the highest. Overall, when the applied amount of potassium silicate fertilizer was 90 kg/ha, the performances of winter wheat were best. Bangladesh J. Bot. 50(4): 1127-1132, 2021 (December)

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flag leaf chlorophyll content rose then fell with increasing fertilizer levels.

Taxon
Winter WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
potassium silicate fertilizert1
Outcome
chlorophyll contente0
Direction
firstly increased and then decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Results showed that the chlorophyll content, net photosynthetic rate of wheat flag leaf firstly increased and then decreased with the increase of levels of potassium silicate fertilizer.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 220–406 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter Wheat (Triticum Aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–123 · show in text ↑
t1

“Potassium Silicate Fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–40 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flag leaf net photosynthetic rate rose then fell with increasing fertilizer levels.

Taxon
Winter WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
potassium silicate fertilizert1
Outcome
net photosynthetic ratee0
Direction
firstly increased and then decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Results showed that the chlorophyll content, net photosynthetic rate of wheat flag leaf firstly increased and then decreased with the increase of levels of potassium silicate fertilizer.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 220–406 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter Wheat (Triticum Aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–123 · show in text ↑
t1

“Potassium Silicate Fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–40 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

At 90 kg/ha, flag leaf chlorophyll persisted significantly longer.

Taxon
Winter WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
potassium silicate fertilizert1
Outcome
existence time of chlorophylle0
Direction
longe0
Value
90 kg/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“when the application of potassium silicate fertilizer was 90 kg/ha, the existence time of chlorophyll in flag leaf was significantly long”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 453–590 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter Wheat (Triticum Aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–123 · show in text ↑
t1

“Potassium Silicate Fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–40 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

At 90 kg/ha, net photosynthetic rate increased significantly.

Taxon
Winter WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
potassium silicate fertilizert1
Outcome
net photosynthetic ratee0
Direction
increasede0
Value
90 kg/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“when the application of potassium silicate fertilizer was 90 kg/ha, the existence time of chlorophyll in flag leaf was significantly long, and the net photosynthetic rate was significantly increased.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 453–652 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter Wheat (Triticum Aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–123 · show in text ↑
t1

“Potassium Silicate Fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–40 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The 1000-grain weight increased significantly.

Taxon
Winter WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
potassium silicate fertilizert1
Outcome
1000-grain weighte0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The 1000-grain weight of winter wheat significantly increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 653–714 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter Wheat (Triticum Aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–123 · show in text ↑
t1

“Potassium Silicate Fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–40 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Winter wheat yield was highest at 90 kg/ha.

Taxon
Winter WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
potassium silicate fertilizert1
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
90 kg/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The 1000-grain weight of winter wheat significantly increased and the yield the highest. Overall, when the applied amount of potassium silicate fertilizer was 90 kg/ha, the performances of winter wheat were best.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 653–865 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter Wheat (Triticum Aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–123 · show in text ↑
t1

“Potassium Silicate Fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–40 · show in text ↑

silicate(4-) · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

20 papers: 18 positive, 2 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

silicate(4-) · physiology: photosynthesis · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

silicate(4-) · physiology: pigments · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

potassium · physiology: pigments · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

18 papers: 16 positive, 2 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

potassium · physiology: photosynthesis · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

24 papers: 19 positive, 5 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

20 papers more in this group

See all 24 papers →

fertilization · physiology: photosynthesis · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

133 papers: 126 positive, 7 negative or no effect

125 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

129 papers more in this group

See all 133 papers →

fertilization · physiology: pigments · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

134 papers: 123 positive, 11 negative or no effect

122 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

130 papers more in this group

See all 134 papers →

potassium · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

257 papers: 227 positive, 30 negative or no effect

226 papers in the same direction as this paper · 29 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

253 papers more in this group

See all 257 papers →

8 of 9 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.