Paper · 2012 · Advance Journal of Food Science and Technology

Effects of Postponing N Application on Wheat Grain Yield, Protein Quality and Fertilizer-N use Efficiency in Low-Yield Field in Jianghan Plain

Xiaoyan Wang; Chunbao Gao; Zhangyong Liu

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
5
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

In 2008 to 2010, the effects of postponing N application on wheat grain yield and process quality were studied in low-yield field in Jianghan Plain in wheat. The results were as follows. When the Topdressing fertilizer N (TN) was postponed from tilling stage to jointing stage, the biomass and the SPAD value in flag leaf reduced, respectively. And grain yield, protein content in grain and stability time of paste, reduced as a result. When the topdressing fertilizer N was postponed from jointing stage to booting stage, the regularity of above index changed conversely. For the treatments with the same topdressing fertilizer date (jointing stage), the appropriate ratio of Basal dressing fertilizer (BN)to topdressing fertilizer was 3:7, with high biomass, high SPAD value in flag leaf, high grain yield and high process quality as a result. The results also indicated that the right stage for more N in organ vegetative to be transferred to grain was jointing stage and the right ratio of BN to TN was 3:7, which was the very basis for high nitrogen fertilizer utilization. Based on the above results, it was suggested that to gain high grain yield and high process quality the appropriate date for topdressing fertilizer N in low-yield field in Jianghan Plain was jointing stage and the ratio of BN to TN was 3:7.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Moving topdressing from tilling to jointing reduced biomass.

Treatment
Topdressing fertilizer N (TN)e0
Outcome
biomasse0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
tilling stagee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“When the Topdressing fertilizer N (TN) was postponed from tilling stage to jointing stage, the biomass and the SPAD value in flag leaf reduced”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 187–329 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–44 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Moving topdressing from tilling to jointing reduced flag leaf SPAD.

Treatment
Topdressing fertilizer N (TN)e0
Outcome
SPAD value in flag leafe0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
tilling stagee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“When the Topdressing fertilizer N (TN) was postponed from tilling stage to jointing stage, the biomass and the SPAD value in flag leaf reduced”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 187–329 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–44 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Moving topdressing to jointing reduced grain yield.

Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“grain yield, protein content in grain and stability time of paste, reduced as a result”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 349–435 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–44 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Moving topdressing to jointing reduced grain protein.

Outcome
protein content in graine0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“grain yield, protein content in grain and stability time of paste, reduced as a result”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 349–435 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–44 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Moving topdressing to jointing reduced paste stability time.

Outcome
stability time of pastee0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“grain yield, protein content in grain and stability time of paste, reduced as a result”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 349–435 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–44 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Moving topdressing from jointing to booting reversed the foregoing response

Outcome
regularity of above indexe0
Qualifier
changed converselye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“When the topdressing fertilizer N was postponed from jointing stage to booting stage, the regularity of above index changed conversely.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 437–572 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–44 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A basal to topdressing ratio of 3:7 at jointing gave high biomass, SPAD, yield and process quality.

Outcome
high biomass, high SPAD value in flag leaf, high grain yield and high process qualitye0
Value
3:7e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the appropriate ratio of Basal dressing fertilizer (BN)to topdressing fertilizer was 3:7, with high biomass, high SPAD value in flag leaf, high grain yield and high process quality as a result.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 652–845 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–44 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Jointing and a 3:7 basal to topdressing ratio supported transfer of vegetative nitrogen to grain and fertilizer use.

Outcome
high nitrogen fertilizer utilizatione0
Value
3:7e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the right stage for more N in organ vegetative to be transferred to grain was jointing stage and the right ratio of BN to TN was 3:7, which was the very basis for high nitrogen fertilizer utilization.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 878–1078 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–44 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend topdressing at jointing with a 3:7 basal to topdressing ratio.

Outcome
jointing stage and the ratio of BN to TN was 3:7e0
Setting
Jianghan Plaine0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the appropriate date for topdressing fertilizer N in low-yield field in Jianghan Plain was jointing stage and the ratio of BN to TN was 3:7”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1179–1318 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–44 · show in text ↑

fertilization · physiology: pigments · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

134 papers: 123 positive, 11 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 123 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

130 papers more in this group

See all 134 papers →

fertilization · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

755 papers: 663 positive, 92 negative or no effect

91 papers in the same direction as this paper · 663 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

751 papers more in this group

See all 755 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.