Paper · 2010 · Soil Science Society of America Journal

Calcium Silicate Suppresses Powdery Mildew and Increases Yield of Field Grown Wheat

Mary C. Provance-Bowley; Joseph R. Heckman; Edward F. Durner

7
claims
13
verbatim quotes
28
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

During three consecutive years of field trials conducted in northwestern New Jersey on a Quakertown silt loam soil (fine–loamy, mixed, active, mesic Typic Hapludult), a calcium silicate, steel slag by‐product (CSS), was added as an effective liming agent to long winter wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) and evaluated for its suppressive effects on powdery mildew disease ( Erysiphe graminis DC. f. sp. tritici Em. Marchal Blumeria graminis (DC.) E.O. Speer = E. graminis DC. Oidium monilioides (Nees) Link [anamorph] ). Limestone was used as the control in a completely random design, consistent for treatment during all trial years. Plots were split for one fungicide, propiconazole (1‐[[2(2,4‐Dichlorophenyl)‐4‐propyl‐1,3‐dioxolan‐2‐yl]methyl]1‐H‐1,2,4‐triazole), application per year. The field was allowed to become naturally inoculated. In 2006 disease symptoms did not appear until late in the season. Although no significant grain yield response was exhibited in 2006, powdery mildew lesions were reduced by 29% on the flag leaves of wheat plants in the CSS treated plots. In 2007, powdery mildew was not diagnosed, but non‐pathogenic Alternaria spp. leaf blotch was observed late season. Leaf blotch lesions were reduced 25% on flag leaves in the CSS‐treated plots. During 2008, powdery mildew lesions on flag leaves were 44% less and yields were 10% greater in plots treated with CSS. Our results suggest that the use of CSS as an effective neutralizer of soil acidity may have the added benefit of suppressing powdery mildew in field grown winter wheat.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Calcium silicate did not produce a significant grain-yield response in 2006.

Treatment
Calcium Silicatet0
Outcome
grain yield responsee0
Qualifier
in 2006e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Although no significant grain yield response was exhibited in 2006”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 905–971 · show in text ↑
t0

“Calcium Silicate Suppresses Powdery Mildew and Increases Yield of Field Grown Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–83 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Calcium silicate reduced wheat powdery mildew lesions by 29% in 2006.

Organ / stage
flag leavese0
Treatment
CSSe0
Outcome
powdery mildew lesionse0
Direction
reducede0
Value
29%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“powdery mildew lesions were reduced by 29% on the flag leaves of wheat plants in the CSS treated plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 973–1075 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Powdery mildew was not diagnosed in 2007.

Outcome
powdery mildew was not diagnosede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In 2007, powdery mildew was not diagnosed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1077–1118 · show in text ↑
t0

“Calcium Silicate Suppresses Powdery Mildew and Increases Yield of Field Grown Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–83 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Non-pathogenic Alternaria leaf blotch was observed in 2007.

Interactor
Alternaria spp.Alternariae0pathogen
Outcome
Alternaria spp. leaf blotch was observede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Alternaria
Alternaria · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)http://phil.cdc.gov/phil_images/20030612/9/PHIL_3963_lores.jpg · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“non‐pathogenic Alternaria spp. leaf blotch was observed late season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1124–1191 · show in text ↑
t0

“Calcium Silicate Suppresses Powdery Mildew and Increases Yield of Field Grown Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–83 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Calcium silicate reduced leaf blotch lesions by 25% in 2007.

Organ / stage
flag leavese0
Treatment
CSSe0
Outcome
Leaf blotch lesionse0
Direction
reducede0
Value
25%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Leaf blotch lesions were reduced 25% on flag leaves in the CSS‐treated plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1193–1269 · show in text ↑
t0

“Calcium Silicate Suppresses Powdery Mildew and Increases Yield of Field Grown Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–83 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Calcium silicate reduced powdery mildew lesions by 44% in 2008.

Organ / stage
flag leavese0
Treatment
CSSe0
Outcome
powdery mildew lesionse0
Direction
lesse0
Value
44%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“During 2008, powdery mildew lesions on flag leaves were 44% less and yields were 10% greater in plots treated with CSS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1271–1389 · show in text ↑
t0

“Calcium Silicate Suppresses Powdery Mildew and Increases Yield of Field Grown Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–83 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Calcium silicate increased yield by 10% in 2008.

Treatment
CSSe0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
greatere0
Value
10%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“During 2008, powdery mildew lesions on flag leaves were 44% less and yields were 10% greater in plots treated with CSS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1271–1389 · show in text ↑
t0

“Calcium Silicate Suppresses Powdery Mildew and Increases Yield of Field Grown Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–83 · show in text ↑

calcium silicate · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

5 papers: 2 positive, 3 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

calcium silicate · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.