Paper · 2015 · Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science

Improvement of wheat (Triticum aestivum) drought tolerance by seed priming with silicon

Mukhtar Ahmed; Umara Qadeer; Zammurad Iqbal Ahmed; et al.

13
claims
26
verbatim quotes
102
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Silicon has the potential to improve drought tolerance in crops. Seeds primed with silicon were used in the present study to explore its potential benefit to withstand water stress. Seeds of two wheat varieties, NARC-2009 and Chakwal-50, were sown in pots after priming with distilled water and different concentrations (0.5%, 1.0% and 1.5%) of silicon sources (silicic acid, sodium silicate and silica gel) at PMAS, Arid Agriculture University, Rawalpindi. Maximum silicon uptake at three-leaf stage (0.028 µg g−1 dry weight (DW)), anthesis (0.072 µg g−1 DW) and maturity (0.103 µg g−1 DW) was recorded for silica gel. Silicon uptake increased significantly in response to increase in Si concentration from 0.5% to 1.5%. Leaf membrane stability index, epicuticular wax, relative water content and proline remained maximum – 78.90%, 2.6 mg g−1 DW, 83.88% and 54.90 µg g−1 – for silica gel treatments compared with others. Silica gel with 1.5% silicon concentration resulted in maximum spike length (14.3 cm), biological yield (7.63 g pot−1), hundred-grain weight (3.97 g pot−1) and grain yield (2.46 g pot−1). Based on the study outcomes, it is concluded that silica gel might be a good priming option with 1.5% silicon concentration to establish plant under drought stress.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Silica gel gave maximum silicon uptake of wheat at the three-leaf stage (0.028 µg g−1 DW).

Material
NARC-2009 and Chakwal-50e5
Organ / stage
three-leaf stagee0
Treatment
silica gele0
Outcome
silicon uptakee0
Direction
Maximume0
Value
0.028 µg g−1 dry weight (DW)e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maximum silicon uptake at three-leaf stage (0.028 µg g−1 dry weight (DW)), anthesis (0.072 µg g−1 DW) and maturity (0.103 µg g−1 DW) was recorded for silica gel”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 458–618 · show in text ↑
e5

“Seeds of two wheat varieties, NARC-2009 and Chakwal-50”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 182–236 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Silica gel gave maximum silicon uptake of wheat at anthesis (0.072 µg g−1 DW).

Material
NARC-2009 and Chakwal-50e5
Organ / stage
anthesise0
Treatment
silica gele0
Outcome
silicon uptakee0
Direction
Maximume0
Value
0.072 µg g−1 DWe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maximum silicon uptake at three-leaf stage (0.028 µg g−1 dry weight (DW)), anthesis (0.072 µg g−1 DW) and maturity (0.103 µg g−1 DW) was recorded for silica gel”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 458–618 · show in text ↑
e5

“Seeds of two wheat varieties, NARC-2009 and Chakwal-50”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 182–236 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Silica gel gave maximum silicon uptake of wheat at maturity (0.103 µg g−1 DW).

Material
NARC-2009 and Chakwal-50e5
Organ / stage
maturitye0
Treatment
silica gele0
Outcome
silicon uptakee0
Direction
Maximume0
Value
0.103 µg g−1 DWe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maximum silicon uptake at three-leaf stage (0.028 µg g−1 dry weight (DW)), anthesis (0.072 µg g−1 DW) and maturity (0.103 µg g−1 DW) was recorded for silica gel”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 458–618 · show in text ↑
e5

“Seeds of two wheat varieties, NARC-2009 and Chakwal-50”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 182–236 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing Si concentration from 0.5% to 1.5% significantly increased silicon uptake of wheat.

Material
NARC-2009 and Chakwal-50e5
Treatment
Si concentratione1
Outcome
Silicon uptakee1
Direction
increasede1
Comparator
0.5%e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Silicon uptake increased significantly in response to increase in Si concentration from 0.5% to 1.5%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 620–720 · show in text ↑
e5

“Seeds of two wheat varieties, NARC-2009 and Chakwal-50”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 182–236 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Silica gel treatments kept the leaf membrane stability index of wheat at its maximum (78.90%) compared with others.

Material
NARC-2009 and Chakwal-50e5
Treatment
silica gel treatmentse2
Outcome
Leaf membrane stability indexe2
Direction
maximume2
Value
78.90%e2
Comparator
otherse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Leaf membrane stability index, epicuticular wax, relative water content and proline remained maximum – 78.90%, 2.6 mg g−1 DW, 83.88% and 54.90 µg g−1 – for silica gel treatments compared with others”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 722–920 · show in text ↑
e5

“Seeds of two wheat varieties, NARC-2009 and Chakwal-50”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 182–236 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Silica gel treatments kept epicuticular wax of wheat at its maximum (2.6 mg g−1 DW) compared with others.

Material
NARC-2009 and Chakwal-50e5
Treatment
silica gel treatmentse2
Outcome
epicuticular waxe2
Direction
maximume2
Value
2.6 mg g−1 DWe2
Comparator
otherse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Leaf membrane stability index, epicuticular wax, relative water content and proline remained maximum – 78.90%, 2.6 mg g−1 DW, 83.88% and 54.90 µg g−1 – for silica gel treatments compared with others”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 722–920 · show in text ↑
e5

“Seeds of two wheat varieties, NARC-2009 and Chakwal-50”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 182–236 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Silica gel treatments kept relative water content of wheat at its maximum (83.88%) compared with others.

Material
NARC-2009 and Chakwal-50e5
Treatment
silica gel treatmentse2
Outcome
relative water contente2
Direction
maximume2
Value
83.88%e2
Comparator
otherse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Leaf membrane stability index, epicuticular wax, relative water content and proline remained maximum – 78.90%, 2.6 mg g−1 DW, 83.88% and 54.90 µg g−1 – for silica gel treatments compared with others”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 722–920 · show in text ↑
e5

“Seeds of two wheat varieties, NARC-2009 and Chakwal-50”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 182–236 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Silica gel treatments kept proline of wheat at its maximum (54.90 µg g−1) compared with others.

Material
NARC-2009 and Chakwal-50e5
Treatment
silica gel treatmentse2
Outcome
prolinee2
Direction
maximume2
Value
54.90 µg g−1e2
Comparator
otherse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Leaf membrane stability index, epicuticular wax, relative water content and proline remained maximum – 78.90%, 2.6 mg g−1 DW, 83.88% and 54.90 µg g−1 – for silica gel treatments compared with others”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 722–920 · show in text ↑
e5

“Seeds of two wheat varieties, NARC-2009 and Chakwal-50”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 182–236 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Silica gel with 1.5% silicon concentration gave maximum spike length of wheat (14.3 cm).

Material
NARC-2009 and Chakwal-50e5
Treatment
Silica gel with 1.5% silicon concentratione3
Outcome
spike lengthe3
Direction
maximume3
Value
14.3 cme3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“Silica gel with 1.5% silicon concentration resulted in maximum spike length (14.3 cm), biological yield (7.63 g pot−1), hundred-grain weight (3.97 g pot−1) and grain yield (2.46 g pot−1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 922–1108 · show in text ↑
e5

“Seeds of two wheat varieties, NARC-2009 and Chakwal-50”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 182–236 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Silica gel with 1.5% silicon concentration gave maximum biological yield of wheat (7.63 g pot−1).

Material
NARC-2009 and Chakwal-50e5
Treatment
Silica gel with 1.5% silicon concentratione3
Outcome
biological yielde3
Direction
maximume3
Value
7.63 g pot−1e3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“Silica gel with 1.5% silicon concentration resulted in maximum spike length (14.3 cm), biological yield (7.63 g pot−1), hundred-grain weight (3.97 g pot−1) and grain yield (2.46 g pot−1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 922–1108 · show in text ↑
e5

“Seeds of two wheat varieties, NARC-2009 and Chakwal-50”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 182–236 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Silica gel with 1.5% silicon concentration gave maximum hundred-grain weight of wheat (3.97 g pot−1).

Material
NARC-2009 and Chakwal-50e5
Treatment
Silica gel with 1.5% silicon concentratione3
Outcome
hundred-grain weighte3
Direction
maximume3
Value
3.97 g pot−1e3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“Silica gel with 1.5% silicon concentration resulted in maximum spike length (14.3 cm), biological yield (7.63 g pot−1), hundred-grain weight (3.97 g pot−1) and grain yield (2.46 g pot−1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 922–1108 · show in text ↑
e5

“Seeds of two wheat varieties, NARC-2009 and Chakwal-50”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 182–236 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Silica gel with 1.5% silicon concentration gave maximum grain yield of wheat (2.46 g pot−1).

Material
NARC-2009 and Chakwal-50e5
Treatment
Silica gel with 1.5% silicon concentratione3
Outcome
grain yielde3
Direction
maximume3
Value
2.46 g pot−1e3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“Silica gel with 1.5% silicon concentration resulted in maximum spike length (14.3 cm), biological yield (7.63 g pot−1), hundred-grain weight (3.97 g pot−1) and grain yield (2.46 g pot−1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 922–1108 · show in text ↑
e5

“Seeds of two wheat varieties, NARC-2009 and Chakwal-50”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 182–236 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Silica gel with 1.5% silicon concentration is a good seed priming option for wheat under drought stress.

Treatment
silica gele4
Outcome
good priming optione4
Qualifier
1.5% silicon concentratione4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“Based on the study outcomes, it is concluded that silica gel might be a good priming option with 1.5% silicon concentration to establish plant under drought stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1110–1273 · show in text ↑
e5

“Seeds of two wheat varieties, NARC-2009 and Chakwal-50”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 182–236 · show in text ↑

silicon dioxide · physiology: osmolytes · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

silicon atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

90 papers: 85 positive, 5 negative or no effect

84 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

86 papers more in this group

See all 90 papers →

silicon dioxide · physiology: oxidative · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

silicon atom · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

61 papers: 58 positive, 3 negative or no effect

57 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

57 papers more in this group

See all 61 papers →

silicon dioxide · molecular: metabolites · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

silicon dioxide · physiology: water · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

silicon dioxide · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

silicon dioxide · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.