Paper · 2024 · Beni-Suef University Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences

Efficacy of nano-silicon extracted from rice husk to modulate the physio-biochemical constituents of wheat for ameliorating drought tolerance without causing cytotoxicity

Rahma Ahmed Abdo; Mahmoud M. Hazem; Abd El-Monaem El-Assar; et al.

8
claims
12
verbatim quotes
37
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Abstract Background Abiotic stresses, like drought, are the major cause of shrinking plant, growth crop yields and quality. Nanotechnology has provided a significant improvement in increasing plant growth and yield of crops under stress conditions. This work assessed the potential of silicon for mitigating the negative effects of drought against wheat. In completely randomized design with three replicates, wheat seedlings grown under three watering levels (100, 60 and 40% of water holding capacity) were treated by silicon dioxide (SiO 2 ) as a normal or bulk form (Si) and SiO 2 nanoparticles (SiNPs) with concentrations of 100 and 200 mg L −1 . SiNPs was extracted from rice husk. Results Si and SiNPs treatments are shown to improve the growth of plants and increase the shoots and root weight, relative water content, photosynthetic pigments, and proline in wheat. SiO 2 either normal or nanoparticles at 100 mg L −1 decreased lipid peroxidation as malondialdehyde was reduced. Also, nano-silicon increased free amino acids, antioxidant enzymes while decreased soluble sugars. Cytotoxicity assay proved the safety of nano-silicon usage. Conclusions In conclusion, the present study documented the significance of rice husk-extracted nano-silicon at rate of 100 mg L −1 for improving growth and increasing tolerance to drought in wheat grown under water deficit.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Si and SiNPs treatments improved the growth of wheat plants.

Treatment
Si and SiNPs treatmentse1
Outcome
growth of plantse1
Direction
improvee1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Si and SiNPs treatments are shown to improve the growth of plants and increase the shoots and root weight, relative water content, photosynthetic pigments, and proline in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 696–872 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Si and SiNPs treatments increased shoot and root weight, relative water content and photosynthetic pigments in wheat.

Treatment
Si and SiNPs treatmentse1
Outcome
shoots and root weight, relative water content, photosynthetic pigmentse1
Direction
increasee1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Si and SiNPs treatments are shown to improve the growth of plants and increase the shoots and root weight, relative water content, photosynthetic pigments, and proline in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 696–872 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Si and SiNPs treatments increased proline in wheat.

Treatment
Si and SiNPs treatmentse1
Outcome
prolinee1
Direction
increasee1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Si and SiNPs treatments are shown to improve the growth of plants and increase the shoots and root weight, relative water content, photosynthetic pigments, and proline in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 696–872 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SiO2 at 100 mg L-1, as normal or nanoparticle form, decreased lipid peroxidation in wheat.

Taxon
physio-biochemical constituents of wheatt0
Treatment
SiO 2 either normal or nanoparticles at 100 mg L −1e1
Outcome
lipid peroxidatione1
Direction
decreasede1
Qualifier
as malondialdehyde was reducede1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“physio-biochemical constituents of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–106 · show in text ↑
e1

“SiO 2 either normal or nanoparticles at 100 mg L −1 decreased lipid peroxidation as malondialdehyde was reduced”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 874–985 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nano-silicon increased free amino acids and antioxidant enzymes in wheat.

Taxon
physio-biochemical constituents of wheatt0
Treatment
nano-silicone1
Outcome
free amino acids, antioxidant enzymese1
Direction
increasede1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“physio-biochemical constituents of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–106 · show in text ↑
e1

“Also, nano-silicon increased free amino acids, antioxidant enzymes while decreased soluble sugars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 987–1084 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nano-silicon decreased soluble sugars in wheat.

Taxon
physio-biochemical constituents of wheatt0
Treatment
nano-silicone1
Outcome
soluble sugarse1
Direction
decreasede1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“physio-biochemical constituents of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–106 · show in text ↑
e1

“Also, nano-silicon increased free amino acids, antioxidant enzymes while decreased soluble sugars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 987–1084 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The cytotoxicity assay showed the safety of nano-silicon usage.

Taxon
physio-biochemical constituents of wheatt0
Outcome
safety of nano-silicon usagee1

Verbatim

t0

“physio-biochemical constituents of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–106 · show in text ↑
e1

“Cytotoxicity assay proved the safety of nano-silicon usage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1086–1144 · show in text ↑

schema checkedfield values found in the cited quotesPermalinkReport an issue

Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice husk-extracted nano-silicon at 100 mg L-1 increased tolerance to drought in wheat grown under water deficit.

Treatment
rice husk-extracted nano-silicon at rate of 100 mg L −1e1
Outcome
tolerance to droughte1
Direction
increasinge1
Qualifier
grown under water deficite1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“rice husk-extracted nano-silicon at rate of 100 mg L −1 for improving growth and increasing tolerance to drought in wheat grown under water deficit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1222–1369 · show in text ↑

silicon dioxide · physiology: osmolytes · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

silicon dioxide · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

20 papers: 15 positive, 5 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

silicon dioxide · physiology: photosynthesis · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Oryza sativa · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

nanoparticle · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

37 papers: 32 positive, 5 negative or no effect

31 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

33 papers more in this group

See all 37 papers →

nanoparticle · physiology: photosynthesis · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

42 papers: 36 positive, 6 negative or no effect

35 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

38 papers more in this group

See all 42 papers →

nanoparticle · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

168 papers: 146 positive, 22 negative or no effect

145 papers in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

164 papers more in this group

See all 168 papers →

nanoparticle · physiology: osmolytes · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

18 papers: 18 positive, 0 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.