Paper · 2021 · Plants

Silicon Dioxide Nanoparticles Induce Innate Immune Responses and Activate Antioxidant Machinery in Wheat Against Rhizoctonia solani

Abdelrazek Abdelrhim; Yasser Mazrou; Yasser Nehela; et al.

7
claims
13
verbatim quotes
106
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The phytopathogenic basidiomycetous fungus, Rhizoctonia solani, has a wide range of host plants including members of the family Poaceae, causing damping-off and root rot diseases. In this study, we biosynthesized spherical-shaped silicon dioxide nanoparticles (SiO2 NPs; sized between 9.92 and 19.8 nm) using saffron extract and introduced them as a potential alternative therapeutic solution to protect wheat seedlings against R. solani. SiO2 NPs showed strong dose-dependent fungistatic activity on R. solani, and significantly reduced mycelial radial growth (up to 100% growth reduction), mycelium fresh and dry weight, and pre-, post-emergence damping-off, and root rot severities. Moreover, the impact of SiO2 NPs on the growth of wheat seedlings and their potential mechanism (s) for disease suppression was deciphered. SiO2 NPs application also improved the germination, vegetative growth, and vigor indexes of infected wheat seedlings which indicates no phytotoxicity on treated wheat seedlings. Moreover, SiO2 NPs enhanced the content of the photosynthetic pigments (chlorophylls and carotenoids), induced the accumulation of defense-related compounds (particularly salicylic acid), and alleviated the oxidative stress via stimulation of both enzymatic (POD, SOD, APX, CAT, and PPO) and non-enzymatic (phenolics and flavonoids) antioxidant defense machinery. Collectively, our findings demonstrated the potential therapeutic role of SiO2 NPs against R. solani infection via the simultaneous activation of a multilayered defense system to suppress the pathogen, neutralize the destructive effect of ROS, lipid peroxidation, and methylglyoxal, and maintain their homeostasis within R. solani-infected plants.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

SiO2 NPs dose-dependently inhibited R. solani growth, reaching 100% radial growth reduction.

Treatment
SiO2 NPse0
Interactor
R. solaniRhizoctonia solanie0pathogen
Outcome
mycelial radial growthe0
Direction
reducede0
Value
100% growth reductione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizoctonia solani
Rhizoctonia solani · Interactoranonimowy, niektóre prawa zastrzeżone (CC BY) · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–104 · show in text ↑
e0

“SiO2 NPs showed strong dose-dependent fungistatic activity on R. solani, and significantly reduced mycelial radial growth (up to 100% growth reduction), mycelium fresh and dry weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 439–621 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

SiO2 NPs significantly reduced R. solani mycelium fresh and dry weight.

Treatment
SiO2 NPse0
Interactor
R. solaniRhizoctonia solanie0pathogen
Outcome
mycelium fresh and dry weighte0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizoctonia solani
Rhizoctonia solani · Interactoranonimowy, niektóre prawa zastrzeżone (CC BY) · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–104 · show in text ↑
e0

“SiO2 NPs showed strong dose-dependent fungistatic activity on R. solani, and significantly reduced mycelial radial growth (up to 100% growth reduction), mycelium fresh and dry weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 439–621 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

SiO2 NPs significantly reduced pre-emergence damping-off and root rot severity.

Treatment
SiO2 NPse0
Interactor
R. solaniRhizoctonia solanie0pathogen
Outcome
pre-, post-emergence damping-off, and root rot severitiese0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizoctonia solani
Rhizoctonia solani · Interactoranonimowy, niektóre prawa zastrzeżone (CC BY) · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–104 · show in text ↑
e0

“SiO2 NPs showed strong dose-dependent fungistatic activity on R. solani, and significantly reduced mycelial radial growth (up to 100% growth reduction), mycelium fresh and dry weight, and pre-, post-emergence damping-off, and root rot severities”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 439–684 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SiO2 NPs improved germination, vegetative growth, and vigor indexes of infected wheat seedlings.

Taxon
wheat seedlingsTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
SiO2 NPs applicatione0
Outcome
germination, vegetative growth, and vigor indexese0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“SiO2 NPs application also improved the germination, vegetative growth, and vigor indexes of infected wheat seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 826–942 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SiO2 NPs enhanced photosynthetic pigment content in infected wheat.

Treatment
SiO2 NPse0
Outcome
content of the photosynthetic pigments (chlorophylls and carotenoids)e0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–104 · show in text ↑
e0

“SiO2 NPs enhanced the content of the photosynthetic pigments (chlorophylls and carotenoids)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1014–1105 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SiO2 NPs induced accumulation of defense compounds, particularly salicylic acid.

Treatment
SiO2 NPse0
Outcome
accumulation of defense-related compounds (particularly salicylic acid)e0
Direction
inducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–104 · show in text ↑
e0

“SiO2 NPs enhanced the content of the photosynthetic pigments (chlorophylls and carotenoids), induced the accumulation of defense-related compounds (particularly salicylic acid)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1014–1190 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SiO2 NPs alleviated oxidative stress and stimulated enzymatic and non-enzymatic antioxidant defenses.

Treatment
SiO2 NPse0
Outcome
oxidative stresse0
Direction
alleviatede0
Qualifier
stimulation of both enzymatic (POD, SOD, APX, CAT, and PPO) and non-enzymatic (phenolics and flavonoids) antioxidant defense machinerye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–104 · show in text ↑
e0

“SiO2 NPs enhanced the content of the photosynthetic pigments (chlorophylls and carotenoids), induced the accumulation of defense-related compounds (particularly salicylic acid), and alleviated the oxidative stress via stimulation of both enzymatic (POD, SOD, APX, CAT, and PPO) and non-enzymatic (phenolics and flavonoids) antioxidant defense machinery”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1014–1366 · show in text ↑

silicon dioxide · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

20 papers: 15 positive, 5 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

silicon dioxide · physiology: oxidative · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

silicon dioxide · physiology: photosynthesis · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

nanoparticle · physiology: oxidative · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

41 papers: 35 positive, 6 negative or no effect

34 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

37 papers more in this group

See all 41 papers →

nanoparticle · physiology: photosynthesis · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

42 papers: 36 positive, 6 negative or no effect

35 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

38 papers more in this group

See all 42 papers →

nanoparticle · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

168 papers: 146 positive, 22 negative or no effect

145 papers in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

164 papers more in this group

See all 168 papers →

nanoparticle · physiology: hormones · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.