Paper · 2022 · Plant Nano Biology

SiO2 nanopriming protects PS I and PSII complexes in wheat under drought stress

Prabha Rai Kalal; Rupal Singh Tomar; Anjana Jajoo

7
claims
15
verbatim quotes
29
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Drought is an important abiotic stress that hampers the growth of plants by inhibiting photosynthesis resulting in major crop losses. Silicon is known for its role to alleviate impact of various abiotic stresses in plants. In the present study, drought sensitive wheat variety HI-1544 was subjected to drought stress (DS) by withholding irrigation. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of SiO2 nanopriming in protecting photosynthesis, particularly photosystems (PSI and PSII), under drought condition. DS significantly reduced the quantum yield of PSII (YII) and PSI (YI) in unprimed drought stressed (UP+DS) plants but non-significant reduction was observed in NP+DS wheat plants. Likewise a severe impairment in the electron transport rate of PSII and PSI (ETRII and ETRI) in UP+DS was noticed as compared to NP+DS plants. Among energy dissipation parameters, regulated and non-regulated energy dissipation [Y(NPQ) and Y(NO) respectively] showed prominent increase in UP+DS plants when compared to NP+DS wheat plants. Decrease in YI was accompanied by significant increase in donor Y(ND) and acceptor side Y(NA) limitation of PSI in UP+DS plants. These parameters were less affected in NP+DS wheat plants. A remarkable inhibition in the oxidation reduction kinetics of P700 was observed in UP+DS plants while it were less affected in NP+DS wheat plants. The data suggests that the impact of drought stress (DS) was more prominent on PSII than PSI. SiO2 nanopriming conferred more protection to PSII complex, thereby improving photosynthetic efficiency under DS.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought stress significantly reduced the quantum yield of PSII and PSI in unprimed wheat plants.

Treatment
drought stress (DS)e0
Outcome
quantum yield of PSII (YII) and PSI (YI)e1
Direction
reducede1
Qualifier
in unprimed drought stressed (UP+DS) plantse1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In the present study, drought sensitive wheat variety HI-1544 was subjected to drought stress (DS) by withholding irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 223–347 · show in text ↑
e1

“DS significantly reduced the quantum yield of PSII (YII) and PSI (YI) in unprimed drought stressed (UP+DS) plants but non-significant reduction was observed in NP+DS wheat plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 515–693 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SiO2 nanopriming gave more protection to the PSII complex under drought stress than unprimed plants.

Treatment
SiO2 nanopriminge7
Outcome
protection to PSII complexe7
Direction
moree7
Comparator
unprimed drought stressed (UP+DS) plantse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In the present study, drought sensitive wheat variety HI-1544 was subjected to drought stress (DS) by withholding irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 223–347 · show in text ↑
e1

“DS significantly reduced the quantum yield of PSII (YII) and PSI (YI) in unprimed drought stressed (UP+DS) plants but non-significant reduction was observed in NP+DS wheat plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 515–693 · show in text ↑
e7

“SiO2 nanopriming conferred more protection to PSII complex, thereby improving photosynthetic efficiency under DS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1463–1575 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Regulated and non-regulated energy dissipation, Y(NPQ) and Y(NO), showed a prominent increase in UP+DS wheat plants compared with NP+DS wheat plants.

Treatment
UP+DSe3
Outcome
regulated and non-regulated energy dissipatione3
Direction
prominent increasee3
Comparator
NP+DS wheat plantse3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In the present study, drought sensitive wheat variety HI-1544 was subjected to drought stress (DS) by withholding irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 223–347 · show in text ↑
e3

“Among energy dissipation parameters, regulated and non-regulated energy dissipation [Y(NPQ) and Y(NO) respectively] showed prominent increase in UP+DS plants when compared to NP+DS wheat plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 838–1031 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Decrease in YI was accompanied by a significant increase in donor side Y(ND) and acceptor side Y(NA) limitation of PSI in UP+DS plants.

Treatment
UP+DSe4
Outcome
donor Y(ND) and acceptor side Y(NA) limitation of PSIe4
Direction
significant increasee4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In the present study, drought sensitive wheat variety HI-1544 was subjected to drought stress (DS) by withholding irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 223–347 · show in text ↑
e4

“Decrease in YI was accompanied by significant increase in donor Y(ND) and acceptor side Y(NA) limitation of PSI in UP+DS plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1033–1160 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Oxidation reduction kinetics of P700 were remarkably inhibited in UP+DS plants compared with NP+DS wheat plants.

Treatment
UP+DSe5
Outcome
oxidation reduction kinetics of P700e5
Direction
remarkable inhibitione5
Comparator
NP+DS wheat plantse5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In the present study, drought sensitive wheat variety HI-1544 was subjected to drought stress (DS) by withholding irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 223–347 · show in text ↑
e5

“A remarkable inhibition in the oxidation reduction kinetics of P700 was observed in UP+DS plants while it were less affected in NP+DS wheat plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1221–1367 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest that drought stress had a more prominent impact on PSII than on PSI.

Treatment
drought stress (DS)e6
Outcome
impact of drought stress (DS)e6
Direction
more prominente6
Qualifier
on PSII than PSIe6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In the present study, drought sensitive wheat variety HI-1544 was subjected to drought stress (DS) by withholding irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 223–347 · show in text ↑
e6

“The data suggests that the impact of drought stress (DS) was more prominent on PSII than PSI”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1369–1461 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Electron transport rate of PSII and PSI showed severe impairment in UP+DS plants compared with NP+DS plants.

Treatment
UP+DSe2
Outcome
electron transport rate of PSII and PSI (ETRII and ETRI)e2
Direction
severe impairmente2
Comparator
NP+DS plantse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In the present study, drought sensitive wheat variety HI-1544 was subjected to drought stress (DS) by withholding irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 223–347 · show in text ↑
e2

“Likewise a severe impairment in the electron transport rate of PSII and PSI (ETRII and ETRI) in UP+DS was noticed as compared to NP+DS plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 695–836 · show in text ↑

silicon dioxide · physiology: photosynthesis · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

nanoparticle · physiology: photosynthesis · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

42 papers: 36 positive, 6 negative or no effect

35 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

38 papers more in this group

See all 42 papers →

drought · physiology: photosynthesis · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

246 papers: 41 positive, 205 negative or no effect

204 papers in the same direction as this paper · 41 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

242 papers more in this group

See all 246 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.