Paper · 1991 · PLANT PHYSIOLOGY

The Sequence of Change within the Photosynthetic Apparatus of Wheat following Short-Term Exposure to Ozone

Peter K. Farage; Stephen P. Long; Elisabeth G. Lechner; et al.

13
claims
28
verbatim quotes
214
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The basis of inhibition of photosynthesis by single acute O(3) exposures was investigated in vivo using analyses based on leaf gas exchange measurements. The fully expanded second leaves of wheat plants (Triticum aestivum L. cv Avalon) were fumigated with either 200 or 400 nanomoles per mole O(3) for between 4 and 16 hours. This reduced significantly the light-saturated rate of CO(2) uptake and was accompanied by a parallel decrease in stomatal conductance. However, the stomatal limitation, estimated from the relationship between CO(2) uptake and the internal CO(2) concentration, only increased significantly during the first 8 hours of exposure to 400 nanomoles per mole O(3); no significant increase occurred for any of the other treatments. Analysis of the response of CO(2) uptake to the internal CO(2) concentration implied that the predominant factor responsible for the reduction in light-saturated CO(2) uptake was a decrease in the efficiency of carboxylation. This was 58 and 21% of the control value after 16 hours at 200 and 400 nanomoles per mole O(3), respectively. At saturating concentrations of CO(2), photosynthesis was inhibited by no more than 22% after 16 hours, indicating that the capacity for regeneration of ribulose bisphosphate was less susceptible to O(3). Ozone fumigations also had a less pronounced effect on light-limited photosynthesis. The maximum quantum yield of CO(2) uptake and the quantum yield of oxygen evolution showed no significant decline after 16 hours with 200 nanomoles per mole O(3), requiring 8 hours at 400 nanomoles per mole O(3) before a significant reduction occurred. The photochemical efficiency of photosystem II estimated from the ratio of variable to maximum chlorophyll fluorescence and the atrazine-binding capacity of isolated thylakoids demonstrated that photochemical reactions were not responsible for the initial inhibition of CO(2) uptake. The results suggest that the apparent carboxylation efficiency appears to be the initial cause of decline in photosynthesis in vivo following acute O(3) fumigation.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Ozone significantly reduced light-saturated CO2 uptake in wheat.

Treatment
Ozonet0
Outcome
light-saturated rate of CO(2) uptakee0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This reduced significantly the light-saturated rate of CO(2) uptake”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 326–393 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat following Short-Term Exposure to Ozone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–106 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ozone exposure decreased stomatal conductance.

Treatment
Ozonet0
Outcome
stomatal conductancee0
Direction
decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“was accompanied by a parallel decrease in stomatal conductance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 398–460 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat following Short-Term Exposure to Ozone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–106 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Stomatal limitation increased significantly only during the first eight hours at 400 nanomoles per mole ozone.

Treatment
400 nanomoles per mole O(3)e0
Outcome
stomatal limitatione0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
first 8 hourse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the stomatal limitation, estimated from the relationship between CO(2) uptake and the internal CO(2) concentration, only increased significantly during the first 8 hours of exposure to 400 nanomoles per mole O(3)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 471–683 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–67 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Other ozone treatments did not significantly increase stomatal limitation.

Treatment
other treatmentse0
Outcome
stomatal limitatione1
Direction
no significant increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“no significant increase occurred for any of the other treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 685–750 · show in text ↑
e1

“the stomatal limitation, estimated from the relationship between CO(2) uptake and the internal CO(2) concentration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 471–585 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–67 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reduced carboxylation efficiency was inferred as the predominant cause of lower light-saturated uptake.

Outcome
reduction in light-saturated CO(2) uptakee0
Qualifier
decrease in the efficiency of carboxylatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the predominant factor responsible for the reduction in light-saturated CO(2) uptake was a decrease in the efficiency of carboxylation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 841–976 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–67 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Carboxylation efficiency reached 58% of control after 16 hours at 200 nanomoles per mole ozone.

Treatment
200e0
Outcome
efficiency of carboxylatione0
Direction
decreasee0
Value
58e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the predominant factor responsible for the reduction in light-saturated CO(2) uptake was a decrease in the efficiency of carboxylation. This was 58 and 21% of the control value after 16 hours at 200 and 400 nanomoles per mole O(3), respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 841–1086 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat following Short-Term Exposure to Ozone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–106 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Carboxylation efficiency reached 21% of control after 16 hours at 400 nanomoles per mole ozone.

Treatment
400 nanomoles per mole O(3)e0
Outcome
efficiency of carboxylatione0
Direction
decreasee0
Value
21%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the predominant factor responsible for the reduction in light-saturated CO(2) uptake was a decrease in the efficiency of carboxylation. This was 58 and 21% of the control value after 16 hours at 200 and 400 nanomoles per mole O(3), respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 841–1086 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat following Short-Term Exposure to Ozone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–106 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At saturating CO2, ozone inhibited photosynthesis by at most 22% after 16 hours.

Treatment
Ozonet0
Outcome
photosynthesise0
Direction
inhibitede0
Value
22%e0
Qualifier
At saturating concentrations of CO(2)e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At saturating concentrations of CO(2), photosynthesis was inhibited by no more than 22% after 16 hours”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1087–1189 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat following Short-Term Exposure to Ozone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–106 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ozone had a less pronounced effect on light-limited photosynthesis.

Treatment
Ozone fumigationse0
Outcome
light-limited photosynthesise0
Direction
less pronouncede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Ozone fumigations also had a less pronounced effect on light-limited photosynthesis.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1292–1376 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–67 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Maximum quantum yield of CO2 uptake showed no significant decline after 16 hours at 200 nanomoles per mole ozone.

Treatment
200 nanomoles per mole O(3)e0
Outcome
maximum quantum yield of CO(2) uptakee0
Direction
no significant declinee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The maximum quantum yield of CO(2) uptake and the quantum yield of oxygen evolution showed no significant decline after 16 hours with 200 nanomoles per mole O(3)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1377–1538 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–67 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Quantum yield of oxygen evolution showed no significant decline after 16 hours at 200 nanomoles per mole ozone.

Treatment
200 nanomoles per mole O(3)e0
Outcome
quantum yield of oxygen evolutione0
Direction
no significant declinee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The maximum quantum yield of CO(2) uptake and the quantum yield of oxygen evolution showed no significant decline after 16 hours with 200 nanomoles per mole O(3)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1377–1538 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–67 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

At 400 nanomoles per mole ozone, quantum yields required eight hours before significant reduction.

Treatment
400 nanomoles per mole O(3)e0
Outcome
quantum yielde1
Direction
reductione0
Qualifier
8 hourse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“requiring 8 hours at 400 nanomoles per mole O(3) before a significant reduction occurred.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1540–1629 · show in text ↑
e1

“The maximum quantum yield of CO(2) uptake and the quantum yield of oxygen evolution”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1377–1460 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–67 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Photochemical measures indicated photochemistry did not cause initial CO2 uptake inhibition.

Outcome
initial inhibition of CO(2) uptakee0
Qualifier
photochemical reactions were not responsiblee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“photochemical reactions were not responsible for the initial inhibition of CO(2) uptake.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1825–1913 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–67 · show in text ↑

ozone · physiology: photosynthesis · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

47 papers: 2 positive, 45 negative or no effect

44 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

43 papers more in this group

See all 47 papers →

ozone · physiology: gas exchange · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 1 positive, 14 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

ozone · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 5 positive, 11 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

nanoparticle · physiology: photosynthesis · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

42 papers: 36 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 36 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

38 papers more in this group

See all 42 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.