Intervention effectmodel-written summary

High nanoparticle concentrations decreased root and shoot fresh weight.

A claim from Effects of silicon oxide nanoparticles on growth and physiology of wheat seedlings · 2016

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

High nanoparticle concentrations decreased root and shoot fresh weight.

Treatment
SiO 2 nanoparticles, at concentrations higher 200 mg/Le0
Outcome
roots and shoots fresh weighte0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“SiO 2 nanoparticles, at concentrations higher 200 mg/L, had negative impacts on wheat seedlings. At these concentrations, SiO 2 nanoparticles significantly decreased roots and shoots fresh weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 173–368

Title

Effects of silicon oxide nanoparticles on growth and physiology of wheat seedlings

J. Karimi; S. Mohsenzadeh Russian Journal of Plant Physiology 2016. doi:10.1134/s1021443716010106

Other claims from this paper (4)

Record rev-417a8d2d55eb5ac2c6d8a9b1ffad0cec21968c21eea77436bf189c4d202db3d4 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

silicon dioxide · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

20 papers: 15 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this claim · 15 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

nanoparticle · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

168 papers: 146 positive, 22 negative or no effect

21 papers in the same direction as this claim · 146 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

159 papers more in this group

See all 168 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.