Paper · 2021 · International Journal of Molecular Sciences

Silica Particles Trigger the Exopolysaccharide Production of Harsh Environment Isolates of Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria and Increase Their Ability to Enhance Wheat Biomass in Drought-Stressed Soils

Anastasiia Fetsiukh; Julian Conrad; Jonas Bergquist; et al.

5
claims
11
verbatim quotes
31
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

In coming decades, drought is expected to expand globally owing to increased evaporation and reduced rainfall. Understanding, predicting, and controlling crop plants' rhizosphere has the potential to manipulate its responses to environmental stress. Our plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) are isolated from a natural laboratory, 'The Evolution Canyon', Israel, (EC), from the wild progenitors of cereals, where they have been co-habituating with their hosts for long periods of time. The study revealed that commercial TM50 silica particles (SN) triggered the PGPR production of exopolysaccharides (EPS) containing D-glucuronate (D-GA). The increased EPS content increased the PGPR water-holding capacity (WHC) and osmotic pressure of the biofilm matrix, which led to enhanced plant biomass in drought-stressed growth environments. Light- and cryo-electron- microscopic studies showed that, in the presence of silica (SN) particles, bacterial morphology is changed, indicating that SNs are associated with significant reprogramming in bacteria. The findings encourage the development of large-scale methods for isolate formulation with natural silicas that ensure higher WHC and hyperosmolarity under field conditions. Osmotic pressure involvement of holobiont cohabitation is also discussed.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Silica particles triggered PGPR production of exopolysaccharides containing D-glucuronate.

Treatment
commercial TM50 silica particles (SN)e0
Interactor
PGPRe0symbiont
Outcome
PGPR production of exopolysaccharides (EPS) containing D-glucuronate (D-GA)e0
Direction
triggerede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“commercial TM50 silica particles (SN) triggered the PGPR production of exopolysaccharides (EPS) containing D-glucuronate (D-GA).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 517–645 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Biomass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 160–173 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Greater EPS content increased PGPR water-holding capacity.

Interactor
PGPRe0symbiont
Compound
EPSe0
Outcome
PGPR water-holding capacity (WHC)e0
Direction
increasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The increased EPS content increased the PGPR water-holding capacity (WHC) and osmotic pressure of the biofilm matrix, which led to enhanced plant biomass in drought-stressed growth environments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 646–840 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Biomass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 160–173 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Greater EPS content increased biofilm-matrix osmotic pressure.

Interactor
PGPRe0symbiont
Compound
EPSe0
Outcome
osmotic pressure of the biofilm matrixe0
Direction
increasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The increased EPS content increased the PGPR water-holding capacity (WHC) and osmotic pressure of the biofilm matrix, which led to enhanced plant biomass in drought-stressed growth environments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 646–840 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Biomass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 160–173 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The EPS-mediated water retention and osmotic pressure enhanced wheat biomass in drought-stressed growth environments.

Interactor
PGPRe0symbiont
Compound
EPSe0
Outcome
plant biomasse0
Direction
enhancede0
Qualifier
drought-stressed growth environmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The increased EPS content increased the PGPR water-holding capacity (WHC) and osmotic pressure of the biofilm matrix, which led to enhanced plant biomass in drought-stressed growth environments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 646–840 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Biomass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 160–173 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Silica particles changed bacterial morphology.

Treatment
silica (SN) particlese0
Interactor
plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR)e1symbiont
Outcome
bacterial morphology is changede0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in the presence of silica (SN) particles, bacterial morphology is changed, indicating that SNs are associated with significant reprogramming in bacteria.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 900–1053 · show in text ↑
e1

“plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 254–297 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Biomass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 160–173 · show in text ↑

silicon dioxide · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

20 papers: 15 positive, 5 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.