Paper · 2025 · Frontiers in Nanotechnology

Biofortification and growth enhancement of wheat via bacteria-assisted iron and zinc nanoparticles

Pradeep Kumar; Anuj Rana; Mansi Sheokand; et al.

20
claims
48
verbatim quotes
4
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

This study reports the isolation of four bacteria from metal-enriched sites and rhizosphere soil and evaluated their tolerance (to 9 mM) toward iron (ferric chloride) and zinc (zinc sulfate). Among all the four isolates, AW5 exhibited plant growth-promoting (PGP) traits, namely, siderophores, indole-3-acetic acid, and increased solubilization of zinc and phosphorus. AW5 efficiently synthesized iron and zinc nanoparticles (NPs) of size 135 nm and 197 nm, respectively. The biologically synthesized iron and zinc NPs (20 ppm) enhanced the bacteria (AW5) growth, production of indole-3-acetic acid and siderophore, and solubilization of phosphate and zinc. A combination of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) and NPs (seed priming) significantly improved shoot (up to 9%) and root length (up to 35%), wheat dry biomass (up to 96%), 100-grain weight (up to 28%), iron content (14%), and zinc content (4%) versus the recommended dose of fertilizer (RDF) control under a pot experiment. A foliar spray of NPs combined with PGPR seed priming showed a significant increase in shoot length (7%) and root length (up to 14%), wheat dry biomass (up to 59%), 100-grain weight (up to 34%), iron content (27%), and zinc content (53%) versus the RDF control under a pot experiment. Nanoparticle treatment through seed priming or foliar spray enhanced plant growth hormones (auxin, 59%) and chlorophyll A and B (51% and 107%) and soil microbial enzymes (dehydrogenase up to 53% and fluorescein diacetate up to 164%), and increased grain fat (65%) and ash content (42%). The synthesized NPs improved root morphology, photosynthesis, and soil enzymatic activities that enhanced the availability of micronutrients from soil to plant for its growth and biofortification. The synergistic impact of NPs bolstered plant–bacteria interactions, hence increasing nutrient uptake by improving the root architecture and facilitating the availability of FeNPs and ZnNPs. This study provides valuable insights into employing bacteria-assisted NPs in biofortification and crop productivity to achieve agricultural sustainability.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 20

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacterial isolate AW5 showed plant growth-promoting traits: siderophores, indole-3-acetic acid and increased zinc and phosphorus solubilization.

Interactor
AW5e1symbiont
Outcome
siderophores, indole-3-acetic acide1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–48 · show in text ↑
e1

“Among all the four isolates, AW5 exhibited plant growth-promoting (PGP) traits, namely, siderophores, indole-3-acetic acid, and increased solubilization of zinc and phosphorus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 192–367 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AW5 synthesized iron nanoparticles of 135 nm.

Interactor
AW5e1symbiont
Outcome
synthesized iron and zinc nanoparticlese1
Value
135 nme1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–48 · show in text ↑
e1

“AW5 efficiently synthesized iron and zinc nanoparticles (NPs) of size 135 nm and 197 nm, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 369–470 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AW5 synthesized zinc nanoparticles of 197 nm.

Interactor
AW5e1symbiont
Outcome
synthesized iron and zinc nanoparticlese1
Value
197 nme1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–48 · show in text ↑
e1

“AW5 efficiently synthesized iron and zinc nanoparticles (NPs) of size 135 nm and 197 nm, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 369–470 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biologically synthesized Fe and Zn nanoparticles at 20 ppm enhanced the growth of AW5 and its production of indole-3-acetic acid and siderophore.

Treatment
biologically synthesized iron and zinc NPs (20 ppm)e1
Interactor
AW5e1symbiont
Outcome
production of indole-3-acetic acid and siderophoree1
Direction
enhancede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–48 · show in text ↑
e1

“The biologically synthesized iron and zinc NPs (20 ppm) enhanced the bacteria (AW5) growth, production of indole-3-acetic acid and siderophore, and solubilization of phosphate and zinc”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 472–656 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed priming with PGPR and NPs significantly improved wheat root length by up to 35% compared with the RDF control in a pot experiment.

Treatment
A combination of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) and NPse1
Interactor
plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR)e1symbiont
Outcome
root lengthe1
Direction
improvede1
Value
up to 35%e1
Comparator
recommended dose of fertilizer (RDF) controle1
Setting
pot experimente1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–48 · show in text ↑
e1

“A combination of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) and NPs (seed priming) significantly improved shoot (up to 9%) and root length (up to 35%), wheat dry biomass (up to 96%), 100-grain weight (up to 28%), iron content (14%), and zinc content (4%) versus the recommended dose of fertilizer (RDF) control under a pot experiment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 658–992 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed priming with PGPR and NPs significantly improved wheat dry biomass by up to 96% compared with the RDF control in a pot experiment.

Treatment
A combination of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) and NPse1
Interactor
plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR)e1symbiont
Outcome
wheat dry biomasse1
Direction
improvede1
Value
up to 96%e1
Comparator
recommended dose of fertilizer (RDF) controle1
Setting
pot experimente1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–48 · show in text ↑
e1

“A combination of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) and NPs (seed priming) significantly improved shoot (up to 9%) and root length (up to 35%), wheat dry biomass (up to 96%), 100-grain weight (up to 28%), iron content (14%), and zinc content (4%) versus the recommended dose of fertilizer (RDF) control under a pot experiment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 658–992 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed priming with PGPR and NPs significantly improved 100-grain weight by up to 28% compared with the RDF control in a pot experiment.

Treatment
A combination of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) and NPse1
Interactor
plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR)e1symbiont
Outcome
100-grain weighte1
Direction
improvede1
Value
up to 28%e1
Comparator
recommended dose of fertilizer (RDF) controle1
Setting
pot experimente1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–48 · show in text ↑
e1

“A combination of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) and NPs (seed priming) significantly improved shoot (up to 9%) and root length (up to 35%), wheat dry biomass (up to 96%), 100-grain weight (up to 28%), iron content (14%), and zinc content (4%) versus the recommended dose of fertilizer (RDF) control under a pot experiment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 658–992 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed priming with PGPR and NPs significantly improved wheat iron content by 14% compared with the RDF control in a pot experiment.

Treatment
A combination of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) and NPse1
Interactor
plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR)e1symbiont
Outcome
iron contente1
Direction
improvede1
Value
14%e1
Comparator
recommended dose of fertilizer (RDF) controle1
Setting
pot experimente1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–48 · show in text ↑
e1

“A combination of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) and NPs (seed priming) significantly improved shoot (up to 9%) and root length (up to 35%), wheat dry biomass (up to 96%), 100-grain weight (up to 28%), iron content (14%), and zinc content (4%) versus the recommended dose of fertilizer (RDF) control under a pot experiment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 658–992 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed priming with PGPR and NPs significantly improved wheat zinc content by 4% compared with the RDF control in a pot experiment.

Treatment
A combination of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) and NPse1
Interactor
plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR)e1symbiont
Outcome
zinc contente1
Direction
improvede1
Value
4%e1
Comparator
recommended dose of fertilizer (RDF) controle1
Setting
pot experimente1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–48 · show in text ↑
e1

“A combination of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) and NPs (seed priming) significantly improved shoot (up to 9%) and root length (up to 35%), wheat dry biomass (up to 96%), 100-grain weight (up to 28%), iron content (14%), and zinc content (4%) versus the recommended dose of fertilizer (RDF) control under a pot experiment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 658–992 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar spray of NPs with PGPR seed priming significantly increased wheat shoot length by 7% compared with the RDF control in a pot experiment.

Treatment
A foliar spray of NPs combined with PGPR seed priminge1
Interactor
PGPRe1symbiont
Outcome
shoot lengthe1
Direction
significant increasee1
Value
7%e1
Comparator
RDF controle1
Setting
pot experimente1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–48 · show in text ↑
e1

“A foliar spray of NPs combined with PGPR seed priming showed a significant increase in shoot length (7%) and root length (up to 14%), wheat dry biomass (up to 59%), 100-grain weight (up to 34%), iron content (27%), and zinc content (53%) versus the RDF control under a pot experiment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 994–1277 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar spray of NPs with PGPR seed priming significantly increased wheat root length by up to 14% compared with the RDF control in a pot experiment.

Treatment
A foliar spray of NPs combined with PGPR seed priminge1
Interactor
PGPRe1symbiont
Outcome
root lengthe1
Direction
significant increasee1
Value
up to 14%e1
Comparator
RDF controle1
Setting
pot experimente1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–48 · show in text ↑
e1

“A foliar spray of NPs combined with PGPR seed priming showed a significant increase in shoot length (7%) and root length (up to 14%), wheat dry biomass (up to 59%), 100-grain weight (up to 34%), iron content (27%), and zinc content (53%) versus the RDF control under a pot experiment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 994–1277 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar spray of NPs with PGPR seed priming significantly increased wheat dry biomass by up to 59% compared with the RDF control in a pot experiment.

Treatment
A foliar spray of NPs combined with PGPR seed priminge1
Interactor
PGPRe1symbiont
Outcome
wheat dry biomasse1
Direction
significant increasee1
Value
up to 59%e1
Comparator
RDF controle1
Setting
pot experimente1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–48 · show in text ↑
e1

“A foliar spray of NPs combined with PGPR seed priming showed a significant increase in shoot length (7%) and root length (up to 14%), wheat dry biomass (up to 59%), 100-grain weight (up to 34%), iron content (27%), and zinc content (53%) versus the RDF control under a pot experiment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 994–1277 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar spray of NPs with PGPR seed priming significantly increased 100-grain weight by up to 34% compared with the RDF control in a pot experiment.

Treatment
A foliar spray of NPs combined with PGPR seed priminge1
Interactor
PGPRe1symbiont
Outcome
100-grain weighte1
Direction
significant increasee1
Value
up to 34%e1
Comparator
RDF controle1
Setting
pot experimente1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–48 · show in text ↑
e1

“A foliar spray of NPs combined with PGPR seed priming showed a significant increase in shoot length (7%) and root length (up to 14%), wheat dry biomass (up to 59%), 100-grain weight (up to 34%), iron content (27%), and zinc content (53%) versus the RDF control under a pot experiment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 994–1277 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar spray of NPs with PGPR seed priming significantly increased wheat iron content by 27% compared with the RDF control in a pot experiment.

Treatment
A foliar spray of NPs combined with PGPR seed priminge1
Interactor
PGPRe1symbiont
Outcome
iron contente1
Direction
significant increasee1
Value
27%e1
Comparator
RDF controle1
Setting
pot experimente1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–48 · show in text ↑
e1

“A foliar spray of NPs combined with PGPR seed priming showed a significant increase in shoot length (7%) and root length (up to 14%), wheat dry biomass (up to 59%), 100-grain weight (up to 34%), iron content (27%), and zinc content (53%) versus the RDF control under a pot experiment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 994–1277 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar spray of NPs with PGPR seed priming significantly increased wheat zinc content by 53% compared with the RDF control in a pot experiment.

Treatment
A foliar spray of NPs combined with PGPR seed priminge1
Interactor
PGPRe1symbiont
Outcome
zinc contente1
Direction
significant increasee1
Value
53%e1
Comparator
RDF controle1
Setting
pot experimente1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–48 · show in text ↑
e1

“A foliar spray of NPs combined with PGPR seed priming showed a significant increase in shoot length (7%) and root length (up to 14%), wheat dry biomass (up to 59%), 100-grain weight (up to 34%), iron content (27%), and zinc content (53%) versus the RDF control under a pot experiment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 994–1277 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nanoparticle treatment enhanced plant growth hormones (auxin) by 59%.

Treatment
Nanoparticle treatment through seed priming or foliar spraye2
Outcome
plant growth hormonese1
Direction
enhancede1
Value
59%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–48 · show in text ↑
e1

“Nanoparticle treatment through seed priming or foliar spray enhanced plant growth hormones (auxin, 59%) and chlorophyll A and B (51% and 107%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1279–1421 · show in text ↑
e2

“Nanoparticle treatment through seed priming or foliar spray”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1279–1338 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nanoparticle treatment enhanced chlorophyll A and B by 51% and 107%.

Treatment
Nanoparticle treatment through seed priming or foliar spraye2
Outcome
chlorophyll A and Be1
Direction
enhancede1
Value
51% and 107%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–48 · show in text ↑
e1

“Nanoparticle treatment through seed priming or foliar spray enhanced plant growth hormones (auxin, 59%) and chlorophyll A and B (51% and 107%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1279–1421 · show in text ↑
e2

“Nanoparticle treatment through seed priming or foliar spray”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1279–1338 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nanoparticle treatment enhanced soil microbial enzymes (dehydrogenase up to 53% and fluorescein diacetate up to 164%).

Treatment
Nanoparticle treatment through seed priming or foliar spraye3
Outcome
soil microbial enzymese1
Direction
enhancede2
Value
dehydrogenase up to 53% and fluorescein diacetate up to 164%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–48 · show in text ↑
e1

“and soil microbial enzymes (dehydrogenase up to 53% and fluorescein diacetate up to 164%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1422–1511 · show in text ↑
e2

“Nanoparticle treatment through seed priming or foliar spray enhanced plant growth hormones (auxin, 59%) and chlorophyll A and B (51% and 107%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1279–1421 · show in text ↑
e3

“Nanoparticle treatment through seed priming or foliar spray”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1279–1338 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nanoparticle treatment increased grain fat by 65%.

Treatment
Nanoparticle treatment through seed priming or foliar spraye3
Outcome
grain fate1
Direction
increasede1
Value
65%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–48 · show in text ↑
e1

“and increased grain fat (65%) and ash content (42%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1513–1564 · show in text ↑
e2

“Nanoparticle treatment through seed priming or foliar spray enhanced plant growth hormones (auxin, 59%) and chlorophyll A and B (51% and 107%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1279–1421 · show in text ↑
e3

“Nanoparticle treatment through seed priming or foliar spray”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1279–1338 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nanoparticle treatment increased grain ash content by 42%.

Treatment
Nanoparticle treatment through seed priming or foliar spraye3
Outcome
ash contente1
Direction
increasede1
Value
42%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–48 · show in text ↑
e1

“and increased grain fat (65%) and ash content (42%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1513–1564 · show in text ↑
e2

“Nanoparticle treatment through seed priming or foliar spray enhanced plant growth hormones (auxin, 59%) and chlorophyll A and B (51% and 107%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1279–1421 · show in text ↑
e3

“Nanoparticle treatment through seed priming or foliar spray”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1279–1338 · show in text ↑

iron atom · physiology: hormones · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

zinc atom · physiology: hormones · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

seed treatment · physiology: hormones · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

seed treatment · soil: biology · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 11 positive, 1 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

seed treatment · quality: grain · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

21 papers: 19 positive, 2 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

nanoparticle · quality: grain · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

22 papers: 20 positive, 2 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

18 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

application · soil: biology · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

22 papers: 19 positive, 3 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

18 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

seed treatment · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

27 papers: 26 positive, 1 negative or no effect

25 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

23 papers more in this group

See all 27 papers →

8 of 26 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.